ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used without rest perfusion for the quantification of ischemia burden. However, the optimal method of analysis is uncertain.
METHODS We identified 666 patients from Clinical Evaluation of MAgnetic Resonance imaging in Coronary heart disease (CE-MARC) with complete stress perfusion, rest perfusion, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) data. For each segment of the 16-segment model, perfusion was visually graded during stress and rest imaging, with infarct transmurality assessed from LGE imaging. In the “Stress-LGE” analysis a segment was defined as ischemic if it had a subendocardial perfusion defect with no infarction. Rest perfusion was not used in this analysis. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of “Stress-LGE” analysis against QCA and the “Stress-rest” method validated in the original CE-MARC analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of the “Stress-LGE” method was evaluated with different thresholds of infarct transmurality, used to define whether an infarcted segment had peri-infarct ischemia.
RESULTS The optimal “Stress-LGE” analysis classified all segments with a stress perfusion defect as ischemic unless they had >75% infarct transmurality (AUC 0.843, sensitivity 75.6%, specificity 93.1%, P<0.001). This analysis method has superior diagnostic accuracy to the “Stress-rest” method (AUC 0.834, sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 93.1%, P<0.001, P-value for difference=0.02). Patients were followed up for median 6.5 years for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with the presence of inducible ischemia by either the “Stress-LGE (>75%)” or “Stress-rest” analysis being similar and strongly predictive (Hazard Ratio 2.65, P<0.0001, for both).
CONCLUSIONS The optimum definition of inducible ischemia was the presence of a stress-induced perfusion defect without transmural infarction. This definition improved the diagnostic accuracy compared to the “Stress-rest” analysis validated in CE-MARC without the need for rest perfusion imaging. The absence of ischemia by either analysis strategy conferred a favorable long-term prognosis.
What is new?Functional ischemia testing, specifically with stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), is an established step in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. This study demonstrates that the rest perfusion imaging can safely be removed from the acquisition and analysis, without compromising imaging diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. For the highest diagnostic accuracy, all segments with stress-induced subendocardial hypoperfusion without transmural infarction should be considered ischemic.
What are the clinical implications?Removal of rest imaging from the stress perfusion CMR examination reduces study duration which could potentially reduce costs, increase throughput, and build capacity to increase access to CMR.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN77246133 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN77246133
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, NIHR, or the Department of Health. Dr Swoboda is funded by the British Heart Foundation (FS/CRA/22/23034). Dr Matthews is funded by the NIHR. Dr Garg is funded by the Wellcome Trust. Prof Plein is supported by a British Heart Foundation Chair (CH/16/2/32089).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) and approved by the United Kingdom National Research Ethics Service (05/Q1205/126); all patients provided informed written consent. Extended 5-year follow-up was conducted with approval from the National Research Ethics Service (14/YH/0137) and under Section 251 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (14/CAG/1018).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(p.swoboda{at}leeds.ac.uk), (gareth.matthews{at}uea.ac.uk), (p.garg{at}uea.ac.uk), (s.plein{at}leeds.ac.uk)
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
- CAD
- Coronary Artery Disease
- CE-MARC
- Clinical Evaluation of MAgnetic Resonance imaging in Coronary heart disease
- CMR
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- FFR
- Fractional Flow Reserve
- LGE
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement
- LVSD
- Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
- MACE
- Major Adverse Cardiac Events
- MI
- Myocardial Infarction
- MPS-SPECT
- Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using single-photon emission computerized tomography
- QCA
- Quantitative coronary angiography
- ROC
- Receiver Operator Curve
- SCMR
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance