Prevalence and factors associated with abdominal and total obesity among low-income urban population of Kiambu County, Kenya

Introduction

The rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as the major cause of morbidity and mortality globally is closely paralleled by and attributable to increasing levels of obesity [1]. The worldwide prevalence of obesity nearly tripled between 1975 and 2016[2]. In 2016 over 2 billion people were overweight or obese and 70% of these people resided in the low and middle income countries(LMICs) [3]. The LMICs are undergoing a demographic transition including migration from rural to urban areas. Urban ways of life involve transitions to more physical inactivity, increased consumption of processed, nutrient dense foods, leading to increased risk of obesity and overweight. The prevalence rates of obesity are increasing more rapidly in LMICs than they are in high income countries (HICs) [4]. In LMICs, the rate of overweight and obesity is higher among females than among males and in urban areas compared to rural areas [4].

Obesity is a primary and fundamental risk factor for most cardiometabolic NCDs and contributes directly to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and CVD mortality independently of other cardiovascular risk factors [5–7]. Overweight and obesity increases the risk for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure (BP), dyslipidemia, certain cancers, musculoskeletal disorders as well as sleep disorders[5] and, more recently, COVID 19 morbidity and mortality [8]. A combination of decline in physical activity, diets becoming sweeter, saltier, and with higher saturated fat content all which trigger the onset of obesity and non-communicable diseases Socio-economic status, age, marital status, physical inactivity and increased energy foods consumption are powerful predictors of overweight and obesity in sub-Saharan Africa [9]. In Kenya, previous studies documented high prevalence of obesity and associated adverse health outcomes [10–13]. The studies with country representative sample show a higher prevalence of overweight/ obesity among the urban population compared to the rural population in Kenya [10, 13].

Although BMI has widely been used to define severity of overweight and obesity across populations, measures of central adiposity, namely waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference (WC) have been adopted as more accurate predictors of cardiovascular risk and have replaced BMI in several definitions for clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome [14–16]. These measurements are easy and affordable to collect and therefore appropriate for low-resource settings. A recent study has shown abdominal obesity as determined by WC is a CVD risk marker that is independent of BMI[5]. A WHtR cutoff of 0.5 is recommended for both sexes and in different ethnic groups and is generally accepted as a universal cutoff for abdominal obesity in adults [14]. Thus, it could be used independently being superior to both BMI and WHR, or together [17].

The purpose of this study is to describe the estimated total obesity using BMI, and abdominal obesity using WC and WHtR and the associated factors. The secondary objective will be to compare the obesity estimates from each measurement in the same study population. Previous studies in this setting [10–13] have used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity at a time there is a shift to measures that focus more on abdominal obesity. The current study utilizes measures of central adiposity in addition to BMI to quantify obesity among urban low-income adults in Kenya.

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

Our study found a prevalence of 62.1% for overweight/obesity, and specifically 33.3% of the participants were overweight while 28.8% were obese by BMI. The prevalence was double that of a study that utilized the 2015 World Health Organization Kenya STEPwise Survey data and showed a national prevalence of overweight/obese of 31.1% [10]. Similarly, in their study, Pengpid & Peltzer reported a lower prevalence of overweight/obese of 28% in Kenya using a nationally representative community based sample [13]. The difference in the prevalence in the current study and the two study may be because the two previous studies used data collected in 2015 that included both rural and urban population. The high prevalence in this study compares to a cross-sectional study among health workers in Kenya that showed a prevalence of 58.8% for overweight/obesity[11]. The prevalence is lower than that of an urban population in a study done in Nigeria that reported a prevalence of obesity and overweight as 21% and 53.3%, respectively[21]. However, the prevalence was higher than that of a study among urban population in Norwest Ethiopia that showed a prevalence of overweight and obesity of 32% and 16% respectively[22].

The prevalence of abdominal obesity as measured by WHtR was 79.8% and WC was 74%. Our findings are similar to those of a study done in Tunisia (Traissac et al., 2015) which showed a much higher prevalence of abdominal than total obesity at 60% and 37% respectively in the same study population. On the contrary, studies measuring abdominal obesity using WC only in Southwest Iran and Southeast Ethiopia recorded a prevalence of 28.6% and 39.01% respectively, much lower than the prevalence from our study (Ghaderian et al., 2019), (Tekalegn et al., 2022). In a meta-analysis study in Ethiopia, the pooled prevalence of abdominal obesity was 37.7% (Tegegne et al., 2022). Our study measured abdominal (central) obesity using two parameters; most studies reviewed had used WC.

Comparing overall overweight/obesity prevalence using BMI and abdominal/central obesity using WHtR and WC, WHtR yielded the highest prevalence of obesity, followed by WC, with BMI, recording the lowest. Our findings are consistent with those of a study in similar settings involving adults from informal settlements in Kenya which documented a much higher prevalence of abdominal obesity by WC of 52% compared to total obesity of 20% by BMI [23]. BMI is a commonly used measure of obesity in low income settings despite its limitation in distinguishing between different body shapes/composition [24]. Previous studies among adults in urban Kenya[23] and urban Bissau in West Africa [25] have shown that individuals with normal weight may have an increased abdominal fat resulting in normal-weight central adiposity [23, 25] defined normal BMI (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m²) with abdominal obesity. Normal-weight central obesity is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to total obesity [26, 27]. Further studies to indicate the magnitude and role of normal-weight abdominal obesity in predicting cardiovascular risks in the current setting are recommended. Our findings also point to need to incorporate the other parameters in addition to BMI for detection and subsequent prevention and management of obesity.

Male participants had reduced odds of total obesity and abdominal obesity by both WC and WHtR compared to females in this study. These findings compare to those from a study with a nationally representative sample from Kenya that showed higher prevalence’s of overall and abdominal obesity in females than males[10]. Similarly, the finding is consistent with that of other studies in Ethiopia[28, 29], Malawi [30] and South Africa[31] that reported increased risk of obesity among females. Previous studies have attempted to attribute this finding to the increased pregnancies[32] and multiparous [33] nature of most females in low income settings. In addition, most men tend to engage in physically demanding and manual occupations that prevent weight gain and reduces their risk of obesity [34, 35]. Body image and societal beauty standards on females have pushed some females to desire to be heavier to feel more attractive[36]. A study in Ghana reported that 6% of females desired to be heavier, and tried to gain weight by consuming more calorie dense food[33]. Hormonal changes in females due to use of hormonal contraceptives also predispose them to obesity [37]. Moreover, postprandial lipemia, which reflects the body’s metabolism of lipids, is reportedly more among females who use oral contraceptives[38], increasing their risk for obesity. These factors may have contributed the high rates of obesity among females in this study; however, future studies to assess the extent to which the factors contribute to obesity among low-income females in Kenya are needed.

This study found that increasing age was significantly associated with higher odds of total obesity, consistent with other studies in similar settings which have reported increased risk of obesity among older adults [11, 39, 40]. Ageing leads to body composition changes, increasing fat mass and decreasing muscle mass [41] and overall metabolism, that limit movement and activity, increasing risk of obesity.

This study found that higher monthly income was associated with increased odds of being obese. Similarly, studies conducted in Ethiopia revealed that respondents who were of a better economic status were more likely to be obese compared to those of low economic status [28, 42]. The increased risk could be attributed to access to sugary and fatty diet together with a sedentary lifestyle among people with better social-economic status. However, previous studies have documented contradictory observations on the relationship between obesity and income in high and low income countries. Studies show that obesity increases with income in low income countries[43, 44] while in high-income countries social economic status is inversely associated with obesity [44, 45]. The mechanisms behind these differences is not well understood with studies suggesting that a combination of several factors to include social, cultural, psychological and biological factors play a role [43]. Further studies to investigate the causal relationship between income and obesity are needed.

Our study found smokers had reduced odds of total obesity (at bivariate) and abdominal obesity compared to non-smokers. The finding is consistent with studies done in Kenya [13], Malawi[30], Burkina Faso [46] and South-Africa [47], that showed negative associations between BMI and cigarette smoking. Similarly, previous studies showed current smokers had lower waist circumference compared to nonsmokers [48, 49]. Two possible mechanism through which cigarette smoking can lead to reduced weight /adiposity include; the effect of nicotine, which increases energy expenditure in short-term and inhibit the expected compensatory increase in caloric intake, and cigarette smoking being a behavioral alternative to eating, resulting in decreased food intake [50, 51].

The strengths of the study are in the large community based sample and the use of more than one metric to estimate obesity in the same population. However, the study has some limitations because the data on behavioral factors were self-reported, collected retrospectively and thus liable to reporting, and recall bias. Similarly, the study utilized cross-sectional design and therefore a causal relationship between the outcome and predictor variables cannot be inferred. Nevertheless, we believe our estimates represent the epidemiology of abdominal and total obesity among the low-income adults in Kiambu County and provides basis for targeted interventions to address the high obesity among urban poor and future studies.

Conclusion

The prevalence of total obesity and abdominal obesity was high in the population. Obesity/overweight by BMI was associated with female gender, increasing age, monthly income, while abdominal obesity by WHtR/WC was associated with female gender, increasing age and cigarrete smoking. Public health strategies focusing on weight reduction and maintenance strategies are urgently needed among low-income adults.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding statement

This research was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No. G-19-57145), Sida (Grant No:54100113), Uppsala Monitoring Center, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), and by the Wellcome Trust [reference no. 107768/Z/15/Z] and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, with support from the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors.