Abstract
Background A global shortage of cholera vaccines has increased use of single-dose regimens, rather than the standard two-dose regimen. There is limited evidence on single-dose protection, particularly in children. In late 2020 a mass vaccination campaign was conducted in Uvira, a cholera endemic urban setting in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Coverage surveys showed that the majority of vaccinated people received only one dose. We examined the effectiveness of a single-dose of the oral cholera vaccine Euvichol-plus in this high-burden setting.
Methods In this case-control study, we recruited medically-attended confirmed cholera cases and age-, sex-, and neighborhood-matched community controls during two distinct periods after mass vaccination, October 2021 to March 2022 (12-17 months post-vaccination) and October 2022 to May 2023 (24-31 months post-vaccination). The odds of vaccination in cases and controls were contrasted in conditional logistic regression models to estimate unadjusted and adjusted vaccine effectiveness.
Findings We enrolled 432 confirmed cases and 1554 matched controls during the two study periods with 21.5% of cases being under five years old. The adjusted single-dose VE was 52% (95% CI: 32·3–66) 12-17 months post-vaccination and 40·8% (95% CI: 8·6–61·7) 24-31 months post-vaccination. Combining the two study periods led to an adjusted single-dose VE of 45% (95% CI 28·2–57·8), with no significant differences among children under five years old and older individuals.
Interpretation A single-dose of Euvichol-Plus provided substantial protection against medically-attended cholera for at least 31 months post-vaccination in this cholera endemic setting.
Funding This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and Gavi (GAVI-RFP-2019-062).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and Gavi (GAVI-RFP-2019-062).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approvals were obtained from Institutional Review Boards of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (IRB00015785), the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (25365) and the Ecole de Sante Publique at the University of Kinshasa (ESP/CE/65/2021).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
