Abstract
Background Severe mental illness (SMI) incorporates schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-organic psychosis, personality disorder or any other severe and enduring mental health illness. Medication, particularly anti-psychotics and mood stabilisers are the main treatment options. Medication optimisation is a hallmark of medication safety, characterized by the use of collaborative, person-centred approaches. There is very little published research describing medication optimisation with people living with SMI.
Objective Published literature and two stakeholder groups were employed to answer: What works for whom and in what circumstances to optimise medication use with people living with SMI in the community?
Methods A five-stage realist review was co-conducted with a lived experience group of individuals living with SMI and a practitioner group caring for individuals with SMI. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across eight bibliographic databases, and literature were screened for relevance to programme theory refinement. In total 60 papers contributed to the review. 42 papers were from the original database search with 18 papers identified from additional database searches and citation searches conducted based on stakeholder recommendations.
Results Our programme theory represents a continuum from a service user’s initial diagnosis of SMI to therapeutic alliance development with practitioners, followed by mutual exchange of information, shared decision-making and medication optimisation. Accompanying the programme theory are 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations that propose evidence-informed contextual factors and mechanisms that either facilitate or impede medication optimisation. Two mid-range theories highlighted in this review are supported decision-making and trust formation.
Conclusions Supported decision-making and trust are foundational to overcoming stigma and establishing ‘safety’ and comfort between service users and practitioners. Avenues for future research include the influence of stigma and equity across cultural and ethnic groups with individuals with SMI; and use of trained supports, such as peer support workers.
What is already known on this topic Medication optimisation is challenging for both people living with SMI and their prescribing clinicians; medication non-adherence is common.
What this study adds Effective medication optimisation requires a person-centred approach embedded throughout a service user’s journey from initial diagnosis to effective medication co-management with practitioners.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy Research is needed in multiple aspects of medication optimisation, including transition from acute care to community, the role of trained peer support workers, and practitioner awareness of unique needs for individuals from ethnic and cultural minority groups.
Competing Interest Statement
Professor Ian Maidment: For list of grants see "Funding" section of: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-9704 Dr Geoff Wong: For list of grants see "Funding" section of: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-4157 Claire Duddy: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-6589 Dr Simon Jacklin: Receives annual funding from the centre for postgraduate pharmacy education for reviewing learning package on shared decision-making. Non-paid advisor to Pfizer on the SHARE project
Funding Statement
This study/project is funded by the NIHR Programme Development Award (203683). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.