Abstract
Our response to threats, including pain, are believed to be learnt during our early interpersonal relationships, and can be measured through attachment style. Preliminary epidemiological evidence suggests that insecure attachment styles are more prevalent in those with chronic pain. Our aim was to determine the association between adult attachment style and chronic pain prevalence and burden in a South African population. A nationwide online survey determined adult attachment style (using The Experience in Close Relationships - Relationship Structures (ECR-RS) Questionnaire), prevalence of chronic pain and typically-associated psychological factors. In those with chronic pain, the association with attachment style and pain burden (pain sites, severity and interference, using the Brief Pain Inventory) was further determined. Results of the 2371 individuals were analyzed using multivariate generalized linear models. In our young (median age 23 years; IQR 20-28), well-educated and primarily female (74%) cohort with predominantly a middle-to-high socioeconomic status, we found a high prevalence of chronic pain (27%). All three insecure attachment styles were associated with increased chronic pain prevalence when compared to the secure attachment style (Dismissing: 31%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 1.38 [1.02-1.85], p=0.037; Preoccupied: 42%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 2.26 [1.62-3.13], p<0.001; Fearful: 49%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 2.95 [2.03-4.29], p<0.001). Adult attachment style was not directly associated with the burden of chronic pain, because pain catastrophizing mediated this relationship. Adult attachment style was, however, directly associated with chronic pain prevalence, with more than double the chronic pain prevalence in the fearfully, compared to securely, attached individuals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences Research Committee.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand gave ethical approval for this work (clearance certificate number: M210449).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Previous presentations: The results, found in this manuscript, were presented in a 10-minute free session presentation at the PainSA 2023 Congress
Disclosures The study was funded by the University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences Research Committee. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.23531076
