Abstract
Background Blood culture contamination is a significant problem in acute care settings. Contamination of a blood sample with pathogens not present in the patient’s blood leads to increases in length of stay, overuse of antimicrobials, and increases in healthcare cost. Several interventions have been reported in different settings within the literature to decrease the contamination. However, their overall effectiveness is currently unknown.
Objective This systematic review aimed to identify interventions to reduce contamination from peripherally collected blood cultures and to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis
Methods In March 2019 we performed a systematic search of English language literature from academic databases, registers of clinical trials and grey literature for interventions aimed at reducing blood culture contamination in adult acute care settings. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed and data were extracted by two independent reviewers.
Results A total of 6,302 articles were retrieved from searches. After removal of duplicates and screening against inclusion criteria 57 studies were included. The majority of the 57 studies had a medium to high risk of bias. These studies identified eight specific interventions (collection packs, dedicated collection teams, education, staff feedback, intervention bundle, sterile procedure, Initial Specimen Diversion Devices, or change of asepsis solution) used in acute care. Thirty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was a wide variation in the definition of contamination which precluded many studies from being included in the meta-analysis. Dedicated collection teams (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.21 – 0.76, I2 87%, p<0.001) and initial specimen diversion devices (RR 0.43, 95%CI0.31 – 0.58, I2 84%, p<0.001) were the most successful at reducing blood culture contamination. Heterogeneity was high across all studies and interventions.
Conclusions The use of dedicated collection teams or initial specimen diversion devices showed the most significant reduction in blood culture contamination; however, other interventions such as intervention bundles, education or feedback, may have benefits in terms of ease of implementation, and have still been shown to lower blood culture contamination.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JAH was supported by a capacity-building grant from the Emergency Medicine Foundation (EMCB-402R23-2015) during part of this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
