Prevalence, Determinants and Care Seeking Behavior for Anxiety and Depression in Nepalese Population: An Analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey Data 2022

Study design

We analyzed data from nationally representative Nepal Health Demographic Survey, 2022 (NDHS 2022).

Study setting

Nepal is a landlocked country located in Southeast Asia region with one federal, seven provincial and 753 local governments (6 metropolitan cities 11 sub-metropolitan cities, urban 275 municipalities, 460 rural municipalities). Nepal has three ecological region-Mountain, Hill and Terai. Based on Census 2021, the total population of Nepal was 29,164,578 with 911,027 (51.1 %) females and 14,253,551 (48.9 %) males. Nepal has the human development index of 0.602, inequality adjusted HDI of 0.449, planetary pressure adjusted HDI of 0.584 and ranks 143 in HDI among countries across the world.

Data collection

From January 5 to June 22, 2022, a total of 19 teams, each comprising a supervisor, one male interviewer, three female interviewers, and one biomarker specialist, conducted data collection for the NDHS 2022.

Dependent variables

Independent variables

The independent variables assessed in this study included age(<20 years, 20-34 years, 34-49 years), sex (male, female), marital status (unmarried, married or living together, divorced or separated or not living together), ethnicity (Brahmin/Chhetri, Dalit, Janajati, Madhesi, Other), religion (Hindu, Other), wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest), disability (no disability, some difficulty, a lot of difficulty or can’t do at all), education (no education, basic, secondary, higher), occupation (not working, agriculture, professional or technical manager or clerical, sales and service, skilled/unskilled labor, other), smoking (do not smoke, some day, everyday), alcohol(never drinker, no drink in past month, some drink in past month, everyday drink), ecological belt (mountain, hill, terai), place of residence (rural, urban), and province(Koshi, Madhesh, Bagmati, Gandaki, Lumbini, Karnali, Sudurpaschim).

Statistical analysis

We used R version 4.2.0 and RStudio for data cleaning and statistical analysis. We performed weighted analysis to account complex survey design of NDHS 2022. We presented categorical variables as frequency, percent (%) and 95% confidence interval (CI) whereas numerical variables as mean and 95% CI. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of depression and anxiety with independent variables. The results of the logistic regression were presented as crude odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio and their 95% CI. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the survey was obtained from Ethical Review Board of Nepal Health Research Council (Reference number: 678, Date: 30^th September 2021) and institutional review board of ICF international (Reference number: 180657.0.001.NP.DHS.01, Date: 28^th April 2022).

Care seeking behavior for anxiety and depression

Of 2217 participants with depression or anxiety in the past 2 weeks, 32.9% (95% CI: 30.4, 34.4) tried to seek help for the things they experienced. Care seeking among males and females were 29.2% (24.8, 34.2) and 34.1% (31.3, 37.0). Among those who seek care, most of the participants seek care from family member other than spouse (44.6%, 95%CI: 40.5, 48.6), from friends(37.0%; 95%CI: 33.0, 41.2), spouse(26.6%, 95%CI: 22.9, 30.7), neighbor (10.9%; 95% CI: 8.8, 13.5), health care providers (9.4%; 95%CI: 7.3, 12.0) and least seek care from social workers and community health workers (<1%).

Sex differences

Our study revealed that females have higher odds of developing anxiety and depression compared to males. In one of previous systematic review that computed the pooled prevalence of depression in 30 countries from 68 studies, the prevalence of depression was found to be 14.4% among female and 11.5% among male.²⁰ One other study has also indicated that women bear higher burden of anxiety⁴ and depression disorder.^{21, 22} A multi-country study has demonstrated that females were found to have 1.6 times in prevalence and DALYs of anxiety disorder compared to males globally.⁴

Although the reason for higher prevalence of anxiety disorder among women is not clearly understood, some factors more sensitivity to criticism, rejection, and separation ^{20, 23, 24}, more frequent encounter of adverse life events such as sexual violence and harassment and higher rates of re-victimization could be responsible for higher prevalence of anxiety among females.^{4, 23, 25–27}

Genetic factors, postnatal stress, cultural environment with unequal gender roles could have some role in exacerbating anxiety among females.^{4, 5} Depression is more common during pregnancy and among women who had recently given birth affecting over 10% of women in this group, which could be one factor for higher prevalence among women.^{1, 28} Some of the previous studies have suggested the onset of puberty may trigger a genetic susceptibility in females.²³ Adolescent girls encounter more stress, particularly interpersonal stress, is known to play a role in the higher rates of depression seen could also be responsible for higher prevalence of depression among females.^{23, 29} The study findings indicate that women may need more specific and targeted interventions so as to reduce the burden of anxiety and depression at national and subnational level.

Provincial differences

Residents in Madhesh province had relatively lower odds of having anxiety and depression compared to Koshi while Karnali province reported slightly higher rates. In one of the previous study, although anxiety and depression were not specifically assessed, Madhesh province was found to have substantially lower prevalence of lifetime mental disorder in one of the nationwide study in 2019-2020.³⁰ Relatively lower prevalence of anxiety, depression or other mental disorder in Madhesh Province and higher prevalence in residents of Karnali province is not clearly understood. However, these differences could be because of some cultural practices, social immersion, cohesion and gathering which have to be further explored through qualitative studies.³⁰

Wealth quintile

Although no significant difference was noted based on wealth quintile on prevalence of depression, the participants belonging to poorer wealth quintile were found to have higher odds of having anxiety compared to the participants in poorest wealth quintile. In the bivariate analysis, participants in richest wealth quintile were found to have lower odds of developing anxiety as well as depression which did not prevail in the multivariable analysis. Although not every study had a statistically significant association between wealth and depression, the majority of studies included in the review exhibited a consistent pattern demonstrating inverse relation between wealth and depression.³¹ Multiple studies suggest that wealth provides a stronger protection against life adversities, provides a sense of financial stability, help manage family expectation and relationships which reduces the chances of life stressors^32–34 and serves as buffer against anxiety and depression symptoms. ^31–34

Age

Although no significant difference was found in prevalence of depression, participants of age 20-34 years and 35-49 years were found to have slightly higher odds of having anxiety compared to participants below the age of 20 years. This could be because of some of the stressful life events like family separation, that people often encounter after age of 20 years in Nepalese context.

Disability

Our study indicates that people with disabilities have higher odds of having anxiety and depression. Depression is an independent risk factor for disability (in old age) and disability increases the risk of depression indicating bi-directional relationship.³⁵ Multiple other studies have shown that disability is associated with anxiety^{36, 37} and depression.^{38, 39} Although the direct link between depression is not clearly understood, depression is linked to particular life situations that are more common among people with disabilities. Furthermore, persons with disabilities face a variety of unique concerns and challenges that may chances of developing depression.⁴⁰ Disability may mean having difficulties in walking around, doing daily works independently like bathing, that may often make them feel frustrated and embarrassed.⁴⁰ People with disabilities often face the social barriers and isolation because of difficulties in joining social functions and gathering, forming social relationship and may often receive limited social support that puts them at higher risk of depression.⁴⁰ Physical or other forms of limitation often puts them on higher risk of being unemployed because of social prejudice and misconception regarding disability.⁴⁰

Care seeking behaviour

Similar to other mental disorders, there is high undertreatment rate for anxiety and depression. In one of the previous study in Sweden, 40.9% of participants with depression, 36.8% of participants with anxiety and 60.9% of participants facing comorbid condition of anxiety and depression were found to seek care. ⁴¹ A systematic review involved analysis of 149 studies from 84 countries between 2000 to 2021, estimated that 33% of patients with major depressive disorder seek care in high income countries while the proportion was 15% in upper middle-income countries and only 8% in LMICs which highlight the notable proportion of the unmet need for mental health services.⁴² Apart from notably lower proportion of patients who seek care, delay in seeking care is other important factor that undermine the health outcomes among individuals with anxiety and depression. In the study in eleven countries: United States, United Kingdom, Italy, South Africa, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, France, Argentina, Belgium and Venezuela, 40% of participants were found to seek care during the same year of encountering disorder while for other remaining participants, the median delay in seeking care from onset of symptoms to seeking care was 8 years.

The unwillingness or inability to seek assistance can be attributed to a range of factors, including high expenses, poor service quality, and limited resource availability. It might also be due to a lack of awareness on mental health, the existence of societal stigma associated with seeking therapy, and negative past experiences with seeking assistance.¹ Further, individuals with mental problems are prevented from receiving the essential treatment because of a number of reasons at the individual, provider, and systemic levels. At the individual level, barriers like reluctance to disclose their issues, anxiety about stigma, time restraints, unfavorable views of treatment, cultural influences, a propensity to manage mental health issues alone, and a low willingness to embrace change all contribute to impeding their desire to receive treatment.⁴³ The proper treatment of patients with anxiety and depression, is hampered at the provider level by a number of variables. These challenges include under-detection at the primary level, care professionals’ little familiarity with mental illnesses, and patients’ physical symptom presentation.⁴³ A dearth of specialized mental health services, a paucity of health workers educated in anxiety and depression diagnosis and treatment techniques, and the absence of integration of mental health care into primary healthcare settings are system-level problems.⁴³

Health impacts, policy and programme implication

Anxiety disorders are consistently linked to significant impairments in both productive roles (such as work absenteeism, work performance, unemployment, and underemployment) and social roles (such as social isolation, interpersonal tensions, and marital disruption) in epidemiological surveys.⁵ Depression can have significant impact on the economy of the country. For example, the health and economic burden of depression was estimated to represent 2.9% of gross domestic products in Singapore.⁴⁴

A substantial proportion of individuals with anxiety and depression do not seek medical attention in earlier stage. Further, health systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries are less prepared for delivery of mental health service and are often underfunded.⁵ Depression is the leading risk factor for suicide with the problem being further exacerbated by substance use disorders.⁵ To transform the mental health agenda, it is critical to invest in addressing the fundamental social and economic factors that affect people’s mental well-being in addition to expanding access to high-quality services and care.¹ According to WHO expanding the provision of treatment for depression and anxiety yields a benefit-to-cost ratio of 5 to 1 meaning that for every one dollar spent in treatment for depression and anxiety, there would be benefits equal to 5 dollar.¹

Some of the strategies for expanding coverage of preventive and curative services included include school-based social and emotional learning programmes, integrating mental health services in primary health care connected with appropriate referral network with higher level facilities, a ban on the use of very toxic pesticides (to prevent suicides), and improved availability of treatment provisions specified in the WHO UHC Compendium.¹ individuals with anxiety and depression can benefit from community-based mental health care because such services are accessible to people.¹ Frequent co-occurance of anxiety and depression and their bidirectional association with conditions like obesity, and chronic conditions like type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and chronic pain disorders ⁵ also point out the need of integrated care.

Task-sharing with primary healthcare practitioners has been shown to be successful in reducing the treatment gap and increasing coverage for priority mental health problems¹ which could be particularly relevant for countries like Nepal facing dearth of psychiatrist and specialized health care facilities for treatment of mental disorder. More people with depression seek support from friends than spouse for anxiety and depression and thus peer support programmes, where people draw on their personal experiences to help one another could be useful in Nepalese context. WHO suggest that peer support programmes could help in information exchange, advocacy and increasing awareness, providing emotional support, providing helpful assistance, creating social contacts.¹

Strengths and limitations of the study

Most of previous studies on anxiety and depression in Nepal are confined to specific group of participants like health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic ^{10, 11}, nurses^{12, 13}, traffic police¹⁴, among patients of type II diabetes^{15, 16}, people living in quarantine centre during COVID-19 pandemic⁴⁵, patients of MDR TB¹⁷ and hypertensive adults¹⁸ and are confined in specific localities. However, our study involves an analysis from nationally representative sample taking into consideration the current federal structure. However, despite being one of the large-scale studies in nationally representative sample, our study has some limitations. The study was not primarily designed to study anxiety and depression but was a part of more comprehensive study that assessed multiple other health problems like reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, fertility behavior, hypertension etc. So, some of the variables that could be important like stress coping skills, meditation behaviour, social capital and social support which could be potentially associated with anxiety and depression have not been assessed in this study. ^{10, 11}.