Abstract
Introduction Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most common paediatric spinal complaints (2-3% of children < 16 years). Regular physical activity is recommended and has been associated with significant improvements in quality of life, reduced pain, and improved function in AIS. However, participation rates remain low amongst individuals with AIS with limited research examining why. This qualitative study aims to identify factors influencing participation in sports, exercise, and physical activities in AIS.
Methods and analysis A qualitative interpretive hermeneutic phenomenology study will be conducted. This study will use a subtle-realist view to enable a focus on the most common experiences of individuals with AIS considering factors influencing participation in exercise, sports, and physical activity. This will be a secondary data analysis (SDA) of a single centre qualitative study completed at a tertiary scoliosis centre during 2022. Participant data drawn from semi structured interviews of individuals <18 years old with a diagnosis of AIS will be included in a six-phase thematic analysis. Rigor will be enhanced through a qualitative checklist, reflexivity, researchers with expertise in the phenomena of interest, and additional researchers from the parent study to critique. Patient and public involvement has been utilised since conceptualisation to improve transparency of reporting.
Ethics and dissemination Full ethical approval was given for this SDA and the parent study by the Health Research Authority (IRAS 289888) and Health and Care Research Wales approval (REC reference: 21/WM/0076). Dissemination will be via peer reviewed publication and conference presentation with results being used to inform future research projects.
Registration details No prior registration has been used for this protocol due to the empirical nature of this secondary data analysis.
Strengths and Limitations
This project will be conducted with a multidisciplinary research team with expertise in qualitative research, spinal conditions and AIS, and patient and public involvement.
This study has ethical strengths in its efficiency of data capture from a single parent study. This is significantly cheaper with standardised procedures, less requirement on children suffering from AIS, and relieves the burden of further participant recruitment.
The nature of SDA requires researcher reflexivity and involvement of the primary researcher from parent study to ensure that there is no loss of contextual information or a lack of immersion in the data.
The sample will be limited to a single centre study with sampling limited to specialist scoliosis clinics giving opportunity for inferential generaslisation, but lacking opportunity for broad basis generalisations or subgroup analysis.
The primary aim of parent study was to assess the content validity of the SRS-22r rather than assessment of factors influencing exercise. However, the interview topic guide was reviewed by the secondary data analyst as well as the wider research team to ensure the capture of appropriate and relevant data for this study.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work has received funding from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Charity.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Full ethical approval was given by the Health Research Authority (IRAS 289888) and Health and Care Research Wales approval (REC reference: 21/WM/0076).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data and information is protected and stored by the research electronic data capture (REDcap) software. All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
