Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the use, impact, and dissemination of preprints in dentistry.
Methods: This is a meta-research study with a cross-sectional design. We included preprints published in dentistry, regardless of the year of publication. Searches were performed in the medRxiv.org and Preprints.org platforms and restricted to English. One researcher extracted the data, and another researcher verified data consistency. The following data were extracted: year of publication, country of the corresponding author, number of abstract and full-text views and downloads, Altmetric attention score, whether the preprint was mentioned in other servers such as Twitter and Publons, number of mentions in other servers, number of citations in the Dimensions database, and whether the preprint had already been published in a peer-reviewed journal. If already published, we extracted the journal’s impact factor (JCR 2021) and the number of citations in the Dimensions database. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the extracted characteristics and explored relationships between metrics using the Spearman correlation.
Results: We identified 276 preprints. Most of the studies were published between 2020 and 2022 (n = 229), especially those from ten countries. The most-cited preprint and published article are the same study. Only the correlation between the number of preprint citations and peer-reviewed article citations in the Dimensions database showed a large positive association (Spearman’s rho = 0.5809).
Conclusion: Preprints gained popularity over the last several years due to the COVID-19 pandemic and reached a larger audience, especially on platforms such as Twitter.
Clinical Significance: Preprint publishing allows faster dissemination of science for the benefit of society.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is funded in part by the Brazilian Federal Agency for Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) Finance code 001. R.S.O is funded in part by Meridional Foundation (Passo Fundo, Brazil). C.G is funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or manuscript publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† Rafael Sarkis-Onofre: rafaelonofre{at}gmail.com Carolina Girotto: carolina.girotto{at}hotmail.com Bernardo Antonio Agostini: bernardoaagostini{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
