Abstract
Background The advantages of urban areas for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), attributable to their extensive medical resources, are well recognized. However, whether a greater abundance of these resources directly improves patient outcomes is unclear. Moreover, it is important to clarify this because of the ongoing global trend of urbanization. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate this issue and shed light on the potential challenges specific to urban environments.
Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between the geographical features of patients with shockable OHCA and neurological outcomes. Data of patients who were transported to Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital between June 1, 2016, and May 30, 2022, were extracted from electronic review board records. The Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category Scale was utilized to evaluate the neurological results. The study employed Bayesian spatial modeling and analyzed the results using the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation and Stochastic Partial Differential Equation methods.
Results Paradoxically, a region with the highest concentration of advanced medical facilities exhibited the poorest neurological outcomes. This area was characterized by an extended duration of on-site emergency medical service activity, which strongly correlated with a negative impact on patients’ neurological outcomes.
Conclusions The abundance of healthcare resources in urban areas does not necessarily correlate with improved outcomes for patients with OHCA. A strategic approach to medical control that considers these factors can potentially enhance the outcomes of patients with OHCA in urban areas.
What is new?In a retrospective geographical analysis of patients with shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), it was found that the region with the highest concentration of advanced medical facilities paradoxically exhibited the poorest neurological outcomes. Additionally, there was a noticeable extension in the duration of on-site emergency medical service activity in this area.
What are the clinical implications?The abundance of healthcare resources in urban areas does not necessarily equate to improved outcomes for patients with OHCA. Therefore, a strategic approach to medical resource management should be considered to effectively utilize these resources and enhance the outcomes of patients in urban areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant number: 21K16585 to AS).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (#M2022-117; May 2023). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the use of anonymized data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns regarding the research participants
