Abstract
In rural, highland Ethiopia, physical function, which is the physical ability to fulfill one’s daily roles and responsibilities, may be compromised by a lack of access to nutrition, healthcare, and sanitation. Decreased physical function would be detrimental to health and income-generating activities. Unfortunately, there is a lack of validated methods to measure physical function in adult women in this region. This validity study evaluated the feasibility and reliability of physical tests, including the sit-to-stand (STS) and usual gait speed (UGS). The physical tests were used to assess the validity of context-appropriate activities of daily living (ADL) questions. The results of the STS were used to calculate a power index (Psts) which accounted for body mass and leg length. Feasibility was ascertained qualitatively. Reliability was assessed by comparing the results of the tests and questions between each visit using either Cohen’s κ or Pearson’s ρ. Validity was assessed by regressing the responses to the ADL questions against Psts, controlling for relevant participant characteristics. Study participants consisted of 316 women between the age of 18 and 45 years, living in rural Tigray, Ethiopia, that had previously participated in an impact evaluation of a safety net program. Over a one-week period, participants completed the STS and UGS tests and responded to the ADL questionnaires three times. Psts was determined to be a feasible, reliable, and valid physical function test for women in rural, highland Ethiopia. UGS lacked feasibility and reliability. The validity of the ADLs was inconclusive. The Psts will be an essential tool for improving physical function and, subsequently, health and quality of life in rural Ethiopia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JG was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award T32-DK007158 while conducting this research. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/ NO JH does not have any disclosures to report. ATM was funded by the International Council on Amino Acid Science and the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council. There aren’t grant numbers associated with these. https://icaas-npo.org/english/index.html https://ushbc.blueberry.org/ NO: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Cornell University Institutional Review Board for Human Participants provided approval of research. Protocol ID#: 1902008596 Written consent was obtained
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All data is available https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QEJGEO
