Abstract
Purpose Although running traditionally relies on critical speed (CS) as an indicator of critical intensity, portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a potential solution for estimating running mechanical power to assess critical power (CP) in runners. The purpose of this study was to determine whether CS and CP differ when assessed using the Stryd device, a portable IMU, and if two running bouts are sufficient to determine CS and CP.
Methods On an outdoor running track, ten trained runners (
, 59.0 [4.2] ml·kg-1·min-1) performed three running time-trials (TT) between 1200 and 4400m on separate days. CS and CP were derived from two-parameter hyperbolic speed-time and power-time models, respectively, using two (CS2TT CP2TT) and three (CS3TT CP3TT) time trials. Subsequently, runners performed constant intensity running for 800m at their calculated CS3TT and CP3TT.
Results Running at the calculated CS3TT speed (3.88 [0.44] m·s-1) elicited an average Stryd running power (271 [28] W) not different from the calculated CP3TT (270 [28]; p=0.940; d=0.02), with excellent agreement between the two values (ICC=0.980). The CS2TT (3.97 [0.42] m·s-1) was not significantly higher than CS3TT (3.89 [0.44] m·s-1; p=0.178; d=0.46); however, CP2TT (278 [29] W) was significantly greater than CP3TT (p=0.041; d=0.75).
Conclusion The running intensities at CS and CP were similar, supporting the use of running power (Stryd) as a metric of aerobic fitness and exercise prescription, and two trials provided a reasonable, albeit higher, estimate of CS and CP.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MJM has received several foot pods from Stryd for research purposes; however, Stryd were not involved in the conduct, analysis, or reporting of this study, and MJM has no professional relationship with Stryd. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; grant number RGPIN-2018-06424), start-up funding from the Faculty of Kinesiology (University of Calgary), the NSERC CREATE Wearable Technology and Collaboration (We-TRAC) Training Program, and Alberta Innovates.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research ethics board (REB) of the University of Calgary gave ethical approval for this work (REB20-1377).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
