Abstract
Background Maternal predisposing factors to adverse birth outcomes are often times assumed to be similar in rural and urban settings. This assumption have led to many failed or failing interventions. This study investigated the maternal risk factors of adverse birth outcomes in a remote community and compared with existing literature of similar studies done in urban areas or developed settings.
Subject and methods This was the baseline data of a prospective cohort study, carried out in Gitwe village, Rwanda, 2019. Healthy, 529 mother-singleton infant pairs were recruited consecutively from Gitwe district hospital.
Results The burden of adverse neonatal outcomes of significance in this rural study (cesarean section delivery, low birth weight, small for gestational age and prematurity) were 38.8%, 10.6%, 21.4% and 4.9%, respectively. Significant (p<0.05) maternal characteristics associated with cesarean section delivery were obesity, high number of antenatal visits (>6), non-christian religion, university education, entrepreneurs, positive HIV status and short stature. Unmarried mothers were likely to produce LBW and preterm babies, while primips were prone to deliver SGA babies. The magnitude of adverse birth outcomes in this rural study was unexpectedly higher than what exist at and their drivers were not exactly the same as in urban settings and at national level.
Conclusion and Recommendations The burden of adverse birth outcomes in this study was higher than that of several countries in the world. Therefore, mothers (not neglecting their marital, HIV, parity and religion status), residing in these rural areas should be priortised for health care interventions, in order to lower the short-and long-term effects of these adverse birth outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research, University of the Free State in South Africa (Ethical Clearance Number: UFS-HSD2018/1493/2901) gave ethical approval for this work. Written permission to collect data was obtained from the Director of Gitwe Hospital and the eligible mothers gave their informed consent before enrolment.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
