Abstract
Problem The escalating mental health crisis among medical students is often met with generalized solutions that overlook substantial individual variations. Furthermore, an exclusive focus on mental illness tends to overshadow the necessity of fostering the positive aspects of medical trainee well-being. This Innovation Report introduces a novel, data-driven precision well-being approach for medical education that is built on a more comprehensive and individualized view of mental health.
Approach Our approach to precision well-being centers on categorizing medical students into distinct and meaningful groups based on their holistic mental health, enabling the future development of tailored wellness support and interventions. We applied k-means clustering, an unsupervised machine learning technique commonly used in precision medicine, to uncover patterns within multidimensional mental health data of medical students. Using data from 3,632 medical students, we formulated our clusters based on recognized metrics for depression, anxiety, and flourishing.
Outcomes Our analysis identified three distinct clusters, each demonstrating unique patterns along the mental health spectrum. Students in the “Healthy Flourishers” cluster expressed no signs of anxiety or depression and simultaneously reported high levels of flourishing, while students in the “Getting By” cluster reported mild anxiety and depression and diminished flourishing. Students in the “At-Risk” cluster expressed high anxiety and depression, minimal flourishing, and increased suicidality. These results represent an integrated, comprehensive empirical model that classifies individual medical students into distinct well-being categories, creating a way for more personalized mental health support strategies.
Next Steps The three-cluster model’s generalizability needs to be improved by incorporating longitudinal data from diverse medical student populations. Integrating physiological markers from wearable devices may improve individualized insights. The model can be used to monitor students’ transitions between clusters, determine influencing factors, form individual risk profiles, and evaluate the effectiveness of personalized intervention strategies stratified by cluster membership.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used data from a publicly available data set. The collection of these data and their use by outside researchers was approved by the University of Michigan IRB.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
