Follow this preprint
Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: including a collider as an auxiliary variable in the imputation model can induce bias
View ORCID ProfileElinor Curnow, Kate Tilling, Jon E Heron, Rosie P Cornish, James R Carpenter
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.16.23291497
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Elinor Curnow
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Kate Tilling
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Jon E Heron
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Rosie P Cornish
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
James R Carpenter
3Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK
4Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, University of London, London, UK

Posted June 18, 2023.
Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: including a collider as an auxiliary variable in the imputation model can induce bias
Elinor Curnow, Kate Tilling, Jon E Heron, Rosie P Cornish, James R Carpenter
medRxiv 2023.06.16.23291497; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.16.23291497
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (413)
- Allergy and Immunology (731)
- Anesthesia (215)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3131)
- Dermatology (266)
- Emergency Medicine (464)
- Epidemiology (13082)
- Forensic Medicine (14)
- Gastroenterology (869)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4902)
- Geriatric Medicine (451)
- Health Economics (757)
- Health Informatics (3091)
- Health Policy (1109)
- Hematology (411)
- HIV/AIDS (975)
- Medical Education (457)
- Medical Ethics (121)
- Nephrology (503)
- Neurology (4671)
- Nursing (248)
- Nutrition (691)
- Oncology (2406)
- Ophthalmology (683)
- Orthopedics (270)
- Otolaryngology (333)
- Pain Medicine (311)
- Palliative Medicine (88)
- Pathology (520)
- Pediatrics (1249)
- Primary Care Research (526)
- Public and Global Health (7233)
- Radiology and Imaging (1615)
- Respiratory Medicine (945)
- Rheumatology (463)
- Sports Medicine (403)
- Surgery (520)
- Toxicology (65)
- Transplantation (223)
- Urology (193)