Imprecision nutrition? Duplicate meals result in unreliable individual glycemic responses measured by continuous glucose monitors across four dietary patterns in adults without diabetes

Aaron Hengist; Jude Anthony Ong; Katherine McNeel; Juen Guo; Kevin D Hall

doi:10.1101/2023.06.14.23291406

Abstract

Background Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are being used to characterize postprandial glycemic responses and thereby provide personalized dietary advice to minimize glycemic excursions. However, the efficacy of such advice depends on reliable CGM responses.

Objective To explore within-subject variability of CGM responses to duplicate meals in an inpatient setting.

Methods CGM data were collected in two controlled feeding studies (NCT03407053 and NCT03878108) in 30 participants without diabetes capturing 1056 meal responses in duplicate ∼1 week apart from four dietary patterns. One study used two different CGMs (Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro and Dexcom G4 Platinum) whereas the other study used only Dexcom. We calculated the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for each 2-h post-meal period and compared within-subject iAUCs using the same CGM for the duplicate meals using linear correlations, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analyses, and compared individual variability of glycemic responses to duplicate meals versus different meals using standard deviations (SDs).

Results There were weak to moderate positive linear correlations between within-subject iAUCs for duplicate meals (Abbott r=0.47, p<0.0001, Dexcom r=0.43, p<0.0001), with low within-participant reliability indicated by ICC (Abbott 0.31, Dexcom 0.14). Bland-Altman analyses indicated wide limits of agreement (Abbott -31.3 to 31.5 mg/dL, Dexcom -30.8 to 30.4 mg/dL) but no significant bias of mean iAUCs for duplicate meals (Abbott 0.1 mg/dL, Dexcom -0.2 mg/dL). Individual variability of glycemic responses to duplicate meals was similar to that of different meals evaluated each diet week for both Abbott (SD_duplicate = 10.7 mg/dL, SD_{week 1} =12.4 mg/dL, SD_{week 2} =11.6 mg/dL, p=0.38) and Dexcom (SD_duplicate = 11.1 mg/dL, SD_{week 1} = 11.5 mg/dL, SD_{week 2} =11.9 mg/dL, p=0.60).

Conclusions Individual postprandial CGM responses to duplicate meals were unreliable in adults without diabetes. Personalized diet advice based on CGM measurements in adults without diabetes requires more reliable methods involving aggregated repeated measurements.

This secondary analysis contains data from two trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03407053 and NCT03878108).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases under award number 1ZIADK013037

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This is an exploratory analysis of data from two clinical research protocols approved by the institutional review board of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and are registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03407053 and NCT03878108)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases.
Added an assessment of individual glucose response variability between simultaneous CGM and venous measurements in response to meal tolerance tests as well as a step-wise regression analyses to investigate effects of behaviors thought to affect postprandial glucose.

Data Availability

Deidentified individual data from consenting subjects will be made freely available upon final publication.

Abbreviations

CGM: continuous glucose monitor
ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license.