Abstract
Background The BFHI program and timely breastfeeding initiation may be threatened by the worldwide rise in cesarean section deliveries, and this might promote prelacteal feeding. What is the current burden and determinants of delayed breastfeeding initiation among mothers, who gave birth via cesarean section?
Subject and methods This was the baseline data of a prospective cohort study, where 529 healthy, singleton mother-newborn pairs were recruited consecutively at birth, from Gitwe district hospital in Rwanda.
Results Overall, the burden of cesarean section delivery, delayed initiation of breastfeeding and prelacteal feeding were 38.8%, 17.0% and 6.0%, respectively. Rate of delayed breastfeeding initiation among mothers, who delivered by cesarean section was 37.6%, compared to 4.0% among those that delivered vaginally, p<0.001. Prelacteal feeds were given to 12.7% of the babies that were delivered by cesarean section, compared to 1.9% among those delivered vaginally, p<0.001. Use of probably ‘unsafe’ water sources located in the household yards was strongly linked to both cesarean section delivery (p<0.000; OR=5.71; 95%CI=2.43, 13.41) and delayed breastfeeding initiation (p<0.000; OR=44.40; 95% CI 7.97, 247.32). Mothers delivered by c-section, who were prenatally exposed to potentially harmful substances, were more likely to delay breastfeeding initiation compared to unexposed mothers (p=0.001; OR=3.14; 95% CI 1.56, 6.31). Cesarean section delivery was more likely with HIV positive mothers (p=0.010; OR=7.14; 95% CI:1.61, 33.33), teenage and entrepreneur mothers. Rate of cesarean section delivery amongst HIV positive mothers was 88.9%, compared to 36.1% among HIV negative mothers.
Conclusion and Recommendations HIV positivity and non-medical causes still drive the over-use of cesarean section for delivery in this rural community, and this impacted negatively on breastfeeding initiation, thereby promoting prelacteal feeding. The uncertain safety of the water sources and prenatal exposures to harmful social habits also need to be addressed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the University of the Free State in South Africa (Ethical Clearance Number UFS-HSD2018/1493/2901) gave ethical approval of this work. Written permission to collect data was obtained from the Director of Gitwe District Hospital and the eligible mothers gave their informed consent before enrolment.,!
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
