Abstract
Electrogastrography (EGG) non-invasively evaluates gastric motility but is viewed as lacking clinical utility. Gastric Alimetry® is a new diagnostic test that combines high-resolution body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) with validated symptom profiling, with the goal of overcoming EGG’s limitations. This study directly compared EGG and BSGM to define performance differences in spectral analysis. Comparisons between Gastric Alimetry BSGM and EGG were conducted by protocolized evaluation of 178 subjects (110 controls; 68 nausea and vomiting (NVS) and/or type 1 diabetes (T1D)). Comparisons followed standard methodologies for each test (pre-processing, post-processing, analysis), with statistical evaluations for group-level differences, symptom correlations, and patient-level classifications. BSGM showed substantially tighter frequency ranges vs EGG in controls. Both tests detected rhythm instability in NVS, but EGG showed opposite frequency effects in T1D. BSGM showed an 8x increase in the number of significant correlations with symptoms. BSGM accuracy for patient-level classification was 0.78 for patients v. controls and 0.96 as compared to blinded consensus panel; EGG accuracy was 0.54 and 0.43. EGG detected group-level differences in patients, but lacked symptom correlations and showed poor accuracy for patient-level classification, explaining EGG’s limited clinical utility. BSGM demonstrated substantial performance improvements across all domains.
Competing Interest Statement
A.A.G., C.N.A., and G.O. hold grants and intellectual property in the field of GI electrophysiology and are members of the University of Auckland spin-out companies: The Insides Company (G.O.), and Alimetry (G.S., S.C., C.D., C.N.A., G.O., and A.A.G.) C.V., W.X., W.J.W., and V.H. have no relevant conflicts to declare.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the NZ Health Research Council Programme
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the University of Auckland gave ethical approval for this work Ethics committee of the University of Calgary gave ethical approval for this work IRB of the University of Louisville gave ethical approval for this work Ethics Committee of the Western Sydney University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon reasonable request. Requests should be made to the corresponding author, Armen Gharibans.
