Abstract
The use of endpoint adjudication committees (EACs) has the potential to reduce subjectivity and potential bias in clinical research trials and contribute to a higher quality of research. In a recent randomized control trial (RCT), we used serial computed tomography (CT) imaging to visualize fracture healing of the scaphoid as a primary outcome. The scaphoid bone poses a challenge in the diagnosing of fractures and non-unions due to its complicated shape. An EAC was created to increase the quality of the data and the validity of our findings. While an adjudication process has long been proposed and described for X-rays, this study outlines a rational approach to CT scan adjudication for bone fracture healing. A total of 364 scans were acquired in the RCT and of these, 101 were adjudicated for a binary endpoint of union vs. non-union. The application of EACs such as described in this paper is a useful tool in orthopaedic research requiring the adjudication of fracture healing as a study outcome.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02383160
Funding Statement
The parent study SNAPU referenced in this manuscript received funding from Bioventus LLC, the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the University of Calgary Office of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, but the work done and presented in this manuscript is unfunded. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The work in this manuscript utilized images from a study involving human participants, the SNAPU Trial. The trial received approval from the University of Calgary, Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB) under REB13-0849.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
