Abstract
Introduction Pharmaceutical innovation can contribute to reducing the burden of disease in human populations. This research considers whether products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2010–2019 and policies for expedited review of products for serious disease were aligned with the US or global burden of disease.
Methods Cross-sectional study of products approved 2010–2019, their first approved indications, designations for expedited review, the burden of disease (DALYs), years of life lost (YLL), and years of life lived with disability (YLD) for 122 WHO Global Health Estimates (GHE) conditions. Statistical analyses of associations between drug approvals, disease burden of conditions comprising first approved indications, and designations for expedited review.
Results The FDA approved 387 drugs 2010–2019 with lead indications for 59/122 GHE conditions. Conditions with at least one new drug had greater US DALYs (U=1193, p=0.001), US YLL (U=1144, p<0.001), global DALYs (U=1436, p=0.030), and global YLL (U=1304, p=0.004) but not US YLD (U=1583, p=0.158) or global YLD (U=1777, p=0.676). Most approvals were for conditions in the top quartiles of US DALYs or YLL, but <27% were for conditions in the top quartile of global DALYs or YLL. The likelihood of a drug having one or more expedited review designations was negatively associated (odds ratio <1) with US DALYs, US YLD, and global YLD. There was a weak negative association with global DALYs and a weak positive association (odds ratio >1) with US and global YLL.
Conclusions Drug approvals 2010–2019 were more strongly aligned with US than global disease burden and more strongly associated with YLL than YLD. Expedited review pathways were not aligned with the US or global burdens of disease and prioritize YLL over YLD. These results may inform policies to incentivize pharmaceutical innovation better aligned with global burden of disease.
What is already known on this topic Pharmaceutical innovation is strongly influenced by (US) market opportunities and poorly aligned with the global burden of disease. Previous studies have suggested that regulatory policies designed to expedite development of products for serious disease could promote better alignment between pharmaceutical innovation and global disease burdens.
What this study adds Drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration 2010–2019 were more strongly associated with the US than global burden of disease and were disproportionately focused on disorders contributing to premature death as opposed to disability. The odds of a product being designated for expedited review was negatively associated with the burden of disease and measures of disability but positively associated with years of life lost to disease.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy This work demonstrates a persistent failure of drug development for conditions that contribute the most to the global burden of disease and disabilities that is not addressed with policies for expedited review. This analysis may inform new policy explicitly designed to promote innovation for indications associated with the greatest disease burden and, specifically, the burden associated with disabilities.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Ledley has received from National Biomedical Research Foundation and the Institute for New Economic Thinking for this work. Dr. Ledley has also received funding for unrelated work from National Pharmaceutical Council. Both Dr. Ledley and Dr. Vaughan have received funding for unrelated work from West Health Policy Center.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Biomedical Research Foundation and the Institute for New Economic Thinking for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All databases used in writing this article are publicly available and cited in the text. All extracted data is provided in supplemental table 1 or supplemental table 2. Results from statistical outputs are provided in supplemental table 4-6.
