Abstract
Classic psychedelics, lysergic acid diethylamide, psilocybin, mescaline and N,N-dimethyltryptamine, are potent psychoactive substances that have been studied for their physiological and psychological effects. However, our understanding of the potential interactions and outcomes when these substances are used in combination with other psychoactive drugs is limited.
This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current research on drug-drug interactions between classic psychedelics and other psychoactive drugs in humans. We conducted a thorough literature search using multiple databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and other sources to supplement our search for relevant studies. A total of 8,487 records published before April 20, 2023, were screened, and studies involving human data describing potential interactions (as well as the lack thereof) between classic psychedelics and other psychoactive drugs were included.
In total, we identified 50 studies from 34 reports, encompassing 31 studies on LSD, 11 on psilocybin, 4 on mescaline, 3 on DMT and 1 on ayahuasca. These studies provide insights into the interactions between classic psychedelics and a range of drugs, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilisers, recreational drugs and others.
The findings reveal various effects when psychedelics are combined with other drugs, including both attenuated and potentiated effects, as well as instances where no changes were observed. With the exception of a few case reports, no significant adverse drug reactions were discovered in the studies included. In-depth discussions of the results are presented, along with an exploration of potential molecular pathways that underlie the observed effects.
Introduction
Classic psychedelics, including lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), psilocybin (psilocin as an active agent), mescaline and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), can be structurally divided into two classes: tryptamines (psilocybin/psilocin, DMT and LSD) and phenethylamines (mescaline) (Johnson et al., 2008). While LSD was first synthesised in 1938, mescaline, psilocybin and DMT are all naturally occurring substances that have been used by humans for centuries (Schlag et al., 2022).
LSD served as an experimental tool during the 1950s-1970s for studying psychotic-like states and modelling psychosis (Bercel et al., 1956), as well as being used in psycholytic psychotherapy (Grieco & Bloom, 1981). The potential therapeutic applications of LSD were also explored, including its use in treating alcoholism (Smart et al., 1966), addiction (Savage & McCabe, 1973) and terminal cancer (Grof et al., 1973). However, the widespread unregulated use of LSD led to a cessation of clinical research in the early 1970s due to political pressure (Liechti, 2017). Despite this, LSD research, along with other classic psychedelics, is picking up speed and emerging again as a powerful tool for treating psychiatric disorders (Carhart-Harris et al., 2021; Davis et al., 2021; Gasser et al., 2015; Holze et al., 2023; Schindler et al., 2021; von Rotz et al., 2023).
The average dose of LSD is 50-200 µg (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019) and the effects of a moderate dose (100 µg) last on average for around 8 hours (Ley et al., 2023). The subjective effects typically involve visual hallucinations, positive experiences of derealization and depersonalization, audiovisual synaesthesia, as well as potential increases in feelings of well-being, happiness, closeness to others, openness and trust (Schmid et al., 2015). Physically, it can increase blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, pupil dilation, plasma cortisol, prolactin, oxytocin and epinephrine (Schmid et al., 2015). However, LSD, as well as other psychedelics, can also have adverse effects and users may experience "bad trips" characterised by anxiety, paranoia, fear and dysphoria (Johnson et al., 2008). In rare cases, the use of LSD can trigger the onset of prolonged psychosis or cause hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (Johnson et al., 2008). LSD has high affinity to several serotonin (5-HT) receptors (such as 5-HT1A/B and 5-HT2A) and has affinity to dopaminergic D1-5 receptors (Halberstadt & Geyer, 2011). The affinity for 5-HT2A is important as the main mechanism behind the behavioural and psychological effects of LSD and other psychedelics is thought to be the activation of 5-HT2A receptors in cortical and subcortical structures (Vollenweider & Smallridge, 2022). LSD is metabolised by enzymes such as CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, with particular emphasis on the primary contribution of the former two (Wagmann et al., 2019).
While LSD is chemically synthesised, psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychedelic compound found in various genera of mushrooms, including Psilocybe, Panaeolus, Conocybe, Gymnopilus, Stropharia, Pluteus and Panaeolina (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019). These mushrooms are commonly referred to as "magic mushrooms’’ due to their psychedelic and hallucinogenic effects (Dinis-Oliveira, 2017). The average dose is 20-40 mg (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019) and a moderate dose of 20 mg typically results in effects lasting around 5 hours (Ley et al., 2023). Typically, the effects involve changes in perception, cognition, affect and mystical-type experiences (Griffiths et al., 2011), similar in nature to those experienced with LSD. Once ingested, the body metabolises psilocybin to psilocin, which is the primary psychoactive compound (Dinis-Oliveira, 2017). The metabolism of psilocybin involves several enzymes, including aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), monoamine oxidase (MAO), UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT1A6, UGT1A7 and UGT1A8 enzymes (Dinis-Oliveira, 2017). Similar to LSD, psilocin acts as an agonist at 5-HT2A receptors in the brain (Rickli et al., 2016), where it exerts its psychological effects (Vollenweider et al., 1998).
Mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine) is a psychedelic compound found in the North American peyote cactus (Lophophora williamsii), the South American San Pedro cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi), as well as other cacti such as the Peruvian torch cactus (Echinopsis peruviana), Bolivian torch cactus (Echinopsis lageniformis) and the leaf cactus (Pereskia aculeata) (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019). It has high affinity for 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A/C receptors, however, being less potent than LSD, psilocin and DMT (Rickli et al., 2016). Mescaline is metabolised in the liver and broken down into several inactive compounds, with oxidative deamination occurring via MAO or diamine oxidase (DAO) (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019). Mescaline is approximately 30 times less potent than psilocybin, and a moderate dose corresponds to 200-400 mg of mescaline sulphate (Ley et al., 2023). The effects of mescaline last longer than LSD, with an average duration of about 11 hours and peak effects occurring around 4 hours after administration (Ley et al., 2023). The subjective effects of mescaline are similar to those of other classic psychedelics and may include hallucinations (closed and open-eye visuals, synaesthesia), altered thinking processes, altered sense of time and spatial distortion (Dinis-Oliveira et al., 2019).
Finally, N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is a naturally occurring psychoactive compound found in several plants and is also endogenously produced in mammals, including humans (Jiménez & Bouso, 2022). Recreationally, DMT is consumed either in a pure form (mostly smoked) or as a key ingredient in an orally active brew called ayahuasca (Cakic et al., 2010). Ayahuasca is made by mixing a DMT-containing plant and a vine containing β-carboline alkaloids (Brito-da-Costa et al., 2020). Although the exact plant combinations can vary, a frequent mixture is made of Psychotria viridis (source of DMT) and Banisteriopsis caapi vine, which stem and bark contains β-carbolines harmine and harmaline (Brito-da-Costa et al., 2020).
DMT is a partial agonist primarily of the 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors (Carbonaro & Gatch, 2016). The effects of DMT can vary depending on the route of administration and dosage. When inhaled or injected, the onset of effects is rapid (Barker, 2022). After injection, the effects are peaking around 90-120 seconds and lasting up to 30 minutes, during which users may experience intense visual hallucinations, euphoria and anxiety (Strassman et al., 1994). Oral consumption of DMT does not produce psychotropic effects due to rapid metabolism by MAO enzymes (Riba et al., 2015). However, when consumed orally as part of the ayahuasca brew, DMT becomes bioavailable due to the MAO-A inhibiting effects of harmine and harmaline, which protect DMT from the deamination in the gut (Brito-da-Costa et al., 2020). In this case, the effects are typically felt within 30-60 minutes and last for around four hours (Barker, 2022). DMT itself has a short half-life of 9-12 minutes and is rapidly metabolised by MAO-A, while CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP2C19 are also involved in its metabolism (Good et al., 2022).
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can be categorised as either pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur when one drug influences the absorption, distribution, metabolism or elimination of another drug. On the other hand, pharmacodynamic interactions involve the modification of the pharmacological effect of one drug by another. These interactions can exhibit synergistic, additive or antagonistic characteristics. Additivity refers to the overall effect of a drug combination being the sum of the effects of each individual drug. while synergy occurs when the combined effect of the drugs is greater than additive. Antagonism arises when the combined effect is less than additive (Niu et al., 2019).
One common mechanism of pharmacodynamic drug interaction is competition at the receptor level. When two drugs interact with the same receptor, they can compete for binding, leading to alterations in pharmacological effects (Lambert, 2004). For instance, blocking the receptors where LSD, psilocin, mescaline or DMT exert their effects, such as 5-HT2A, could impede their psychological effects.
An example of a pharmacokinetic DDI is the inhibition of drug-metabolising enzymes, such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) that are responsible for metabolising a broad range of drugs (Zhao et al., 2021). Inhibition of these enzymes by concomitant drugs or circulating metabolites can lead to altered drug metabolism and impact the drug’s effects and influence treatment outcomes (Zhao et al., 2021). Additionally, there is the potential for interaction with P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a membrane transporter that facilitates the efflux of various drugs and is present in kidneys, liver, gastrointestinal tract and blood-brain barrier (M. L. Amin, 2013). Similarly with CYP enzymes, reducing the activity of P-gp can increase the concentration of its substrates in the blood, while increasing its activity can decrease the concentration, leading to inadequate therapeutic effects (M. L. Amin, 2013).
For instance, CYP enzymes have a known role in LSD metabolism (Luethi et al., 2019), and therefore can affect LSD’s effects. DDIs can take place even when drugs are not taken concurrently, allowing for days or even weeks between their administration. Some drugs, like fluoxetine, have prolonged inhibitory effects on CYP-activity that may persist for several weeks following its discontinuation due to the extended half-life of fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine (Hemeryck & Belpaire, 2002).
Currently, there is limited literature available on the drug-drug interactions between classic psychedelics and other psychoactive drugs. While two review articles have been published on this subject, the first one was limited in scope (Wyatt et al., 1976) and the second one focused solely on MDMA and psilocybin interactions with psychiatric medications (Sarparast et al., 2022). To fill this gap, this systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on DDIs between classic psychedelics and any other psychoactive drugs. We conducted a thorough literature search and report on both physiological and subjective outcomes. This review offers valuable insights into the potential risks and benefits of combining classic psychedelics with other psychoactive drugs, thereby guiding researchers and clinicians in the field.
Methods
This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022336092) and followed the latest PRISMA (2020) guidelines (Page et al., 2021). A keyword search for articles pertaining to classical psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT and ayahuasca) was initially conducted on June 5, 2022, in three primary scientific databases: PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science (with no year restriction). These databases comprise a general journal articles database and a database specialised in biomedicine and psychology research. Search terms included keywords (including synonyms) related to classic psychedelics in the title, abstract, keywords, full text (where available) and MeSH terms, as well as keywords related to drug interactions, side-effects and adverse reactions. The search was not limited by time period in order to capture all relevant articles. A total of 2,151 articles were found during the first search. The search was repeated on April 20, 2023, to manually identify any additional articles published since the initial search. The full search terms for each database can be found in the Supplementary information.
Additionally, to ensure comprehensive coverage, a search was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) comprehensive online “Psychedelic Bibliography” database (https://bibliography.maps.org), which contains scientific but also non-scientific articles specifically about psychedelics, dating back to 1841. At the time of the search (20 Nov 2022), the database included a total of 13,237 records. All records were downloaded, followed by keyword search in all titles and abstracts (targeting “LSD”, “psilocybin”, “mescaline”, “DMT” and “ayahuasca”, including synonyms and variations), which resulted in a total of 6,336 records.
Furthermore, we manually conducted a search in a registry of clinical trials at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 20, 2023, to find any articles containing results from clinical trials that were missed in the database search and conducted reference lists checking of included studies to find additional missing articles.
Records were screened in two phases: firstly, the ones found via scientific database search and after the completion, the ones found in the MAPS bibliography database. In both cases, a systematic review application Catchii (Halman & Oshlack, 2023) was used. Duplicate removal was done by using Catchii’s duplicate detection and manually verifying the results before removal. Two researchers independently conducted title and abstract screening, both being blind to each other’s decisions. The inclusion criteria were: (A) any article on human participants, (B) any article describing usage of any classical psychedelics with another psychoactive drug, (C) studies describing subjective and/or psychological effects of classical psychedelics with another psychoactive drug (or the lack of), (D) studies that were either randomised controlled trials, observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional) or case reports/studies, (E) studies published in English. Disagreements between reviewers were discussed until a consensus decision was reached. Records that did not meet the population, intervention and outcome (PIO) criteria were excluded. A total of 8,487 records were screened in the first stage (title and abstract analysis) and 71 reports after assessing full-text in the second stage. The summary of results can be seen on the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1). Data from all eligible records was extracted by authors of this review, who corroborated each other’s findings. Outcome measures included physiological and subjective effects.
PRISMA flow diagram.
Results
The results of this systematic review include studies investigating drug-drug interactions between psychedelic drugs (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT and ayahuasca) and other psychoactive drugs. Regarding LSD, the review examined interactions with antipsychotics (chlorpromazine), mood stabilisers (lithium), various antidepressants including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and trazodone), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; imipramine, desipramine and clomipramine), as well as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs; phenelzine, isocarboxazid, nialamide and iproniazid) and other substances (azacyclonol). Recreational substances (alcohol), as well as other substances like ketanserin, reserpine, niacin, scopolamine and phenoxybenzamine, are also included.
In relation to psilocybin, the review contains reports about interactions with anxiolytics (buspirone), antipsychotics (chlorpromazine, haloperidol and risperidone), SSRI antidepressants (escitalopram) and recreational drugs (alcohol and cannabis). Other substances investigated include ketanserin and ergotamine. In the case of mescaline, the review examines interactions with antipsychotics (chlorpromazine and promazine), antidepressants (azacyclonol) and the compound 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-O). For DMT, the review explores interactions with MAOI antidepressants (iproniazid), as well as other substances like racemic pindolol and methysergide. Lastly, one report of the SSRI antidepressant fluoxetine was found for ayahuasca.
Separate tables are provided in this review for LSD (Table 1), psilocybin (Table 2), mescaline (Table 3) and DMT together with ayahuasca (Table 4), with results sorted by drug class. Additionally, a combined Table 5 summarises all results from Tables 1-4, along with the main molecular targets of each drug.
Summary of studies and case reports describing interactions (or the absence thereof) between LSD and other psychoactive drugs.
Summary of studies and case reports describing interactions (or the absence thereof) between psilocybin and other psychoactive drugs.
Summary of studies and case reports describing interactions (or the absence thereof) between mescaline and other psychoactive drugs.
Summary of studies and case reports describing interactions (or the absence thereof) between DMT/ayahuasca and other psychoactive drugs.
Summary table of all drug-drug interactions together with molecular targets.
LSD
A total of 22 studies and 9 case series/reports were identified, describing interactions with antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, various antidepressants, recreational drugs and other substances. Two studies reported no effects when concomitant drugs were used.
Antipsychotics: Chlorpromazine
A couple of studies have been done to investigate the effects of chlorpromazine pretreatment on LSD response. In a series of blocking experiments in which participants were administered 50-100 mg chlorpromazine followed by 40-60 μg of LSD ingestion, the LSD-induced subjective effects were reduced in all doses of chlorpromazine, including anxiety, changes in sensory perception and hallucination (Isbell & Logan, 1957). In the reverse experiment whereby LSD was ingested prior to oral administration of chlorpromazine, no significant difference to LSD effects were observed when compared to placebo control. However, intramuscularly-administered chlorpromazine did significantly reduce the intensity of LSD reaction (Isbell & Logan, 1957). Murphree (1962) reported contrasting results whereby pretreatment with 25 mg oral chlorpromazine just 30 minutes before was enough to block LSD-induced effects.
On the other hand, Abramson et al. (1960) reported that oral ingestion of chlorpromazine enhanced the physiological and perceptual state, as well as the hallucinations and consciousness induced by LSD, regardless of whether chlorpromazine was ingested 1.5 hours before or after LSD administration. Similarly, in a cohort of schizophrenic patients, Schwarz (1967) reported that chlorpromazine administration after LSD enhanced the effects of LSD such that one patient had thought that he had been given another dose of LSD while another subject reported feeling worse and anxious. Notably, simultaneous ingestion of chlorpromazine with LSD did not alter any of the subjective or physical effects of LSD effects (Abramson et al., 1960; Murphree, 1962).
Mood stabilisers: Lithium
A study led by Bonson and Murphy (1996) examined the effects of lithium on LSD-effects. Three participants who had been chronically taking either lithium alone at 600 mg/day or 1000 mg/day; or in combination with the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine at 175 mg/day for 7-50 weeks stated they experienced overall enhanced effects of LSD. Additionally, there was an earlier onset of the effects along with potentiated hallucinatory and psychological effects of LSD. Each of the three participants who were interviewed reported experiencing hallucinations that were more visually vivid or intense than with the normal hallucinogenic effects of LSD which had been expected (Bonson & Murphy, 1996).
Antidepressants (SSRI and SARI): Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and trazodone
Strassman (1992) reported a case of one adult male receiving fluoxetine to treat dysthymia. The subject had markedly decreased sensitivity to LSD whereby the usual dose that was capable of eliciting a full hallucinogenic effect was only ½ or ⅓ as effective in producing the desired effects after pretreatment with fluoxetine (Strassman, 1992). In 1996, a cohort study was conducted by Bonson et al. (1996) to investigate the effects of various SSRIs including fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine and serotonin receptor antagonists and reuptake inhibitors (SARI) trazodone, on the LSD response. In general, pretreatment of at least 2 weeks with SSRIs or SARI attenuated the overall response to LSD such as decreased physical, hallucinogenic and psychological effects of LSD regardless of dose or duration of pretreatment with the SSRI. Notably, one subject who had been on fluoxetine for 1 week reported attenuated effects of LSD and after a month of fluoxetine discontinuation, the normal responses to LSD returned (Bonson et al., 1996).
Antidepressants (TCA): Imipramine, desipramine and clomipramine
The effects of multiple tricyclic antidepressants including imipramine, desipramine and clomipramine on LSD response were investigated by Bonson and Murphy (1996). Participants were treated with 125 mg to 200 mg/day tricyclic antidepressants for at least 8 weeks prior to administration of LSD at a minimum dose of 80 μg. The pretreatment of the TCAS led to an earlier onset of LSD effects as well as increased the physical, hallucinatory and psychological effects of LSD. Notably, one patient who had stopped desipramine treatment for 12 weeks still experienced the potentiated effects of LSD in terms of psychological and hallucinatory response but not at 20 weeks after. Conversely, another patient who had stopped clomipramine treatment for 12 weeks no longer felt the enhanced effects of LSD (Bonson & Murphy, 1996).
Antidepressants (MAOI): Isocarboxazid, phenelzine, nialamide and iproniazid
Three independent studies have investigated the effects of MAOI on LSD response. Resnick et al. (1964) were amongst the first to investigate the effects of MAOI isocarboxazid (brand name Marplan). Pretreatment of participants with 30 mg/day isocarboxazid for 5 days or 2 weeks prior to oral administration of 40 μg LSD attenuated autonomic and psychological responses of LSD (Resnick et al., 1964). Similarly, Bonson and Murphy (1996) reported that pretreatment of participants with 60-75 mg/day phenelzine for 12 weeks followed by 150 μg of LSD dose nearly abolished subjective responses to LSD (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). Pretreatment with nialamide, a different MAOI, daily for 3 weeks to reach a total dose of 3500 mg also blocked the effects of LSD and patients tolerated very high doses of LSD at 500 μg without any clinical or psychotic symptoms (Grof & Dytrych, 1965). In contrast, iproniazid at 100 mg, when taken together with varying doses of LSD, did not alter any physical or subjective effects of LSD (DeMaar et al., 1960).
Recreational drugs: Alcohol
There are very limited studies on the effects of alcohol on LSD response. A retrospective self-report study conducted by Barrett et al. (2000) aimed to explore the effects of alcohol and LSD on each other when consumed together. A total of 13 out of 15 participants (86.7%) reported complete blockage of subjective alcohol effects while under the influence of LSD and the remainder reported diminished effect of alcohol. These participants reported that higher doses of alcohol were required to become intoxicated when under the influence of LSD. One of them also noticed that none of the alcohol effects could be felt until the effects of LSD had worn off and if LSD was taken after feeling intoxicated, the alcohol effects would dissipate after LSD intake. In regards to the effects of alcohol on LSD however, none of the participants observed any consequence by alcohol on the subjective effects of LSD (Barrett et al., 2000).
Other: Reserpine
Reserpine was found to enhance some aspects of LSD-effects in a few studies (Freedman, 1963; Isbell & Logan, 1957; Resnick et al., 1965), with a dose-dependent effect observed in one study. Isbell and Logan (1957) first investigated the effects of reserpine in twelve non-psychotic adults in a series of experiments with varying concentrations of reserpine and administration route. Participants pretreated with either a single dose of 1 mg oral reserpine 2 hours prior to 60 μg LSD; 5 mg oral reserpine divided over 2 doses at 10 and 2 hours prior to 60 μg LSD treatment did not experience any blocking effects from reserpine. However, participants treated with 7.5 mg oral reserpine divided over three doses at 22, 10 and 2 hours prior to LSD treatment experienced worsened effects (Isbell & Logan, 1957).
Leaving aside the expected reserpine side-effects such as nasal stuffiness, nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, lethargy, weakness and dizziness, individuals also had increased nervousness and confusion when used LSD together with reserpine. Over half of the patients who received 6 mg of reserpine intramuscular with 60 μg/kg of LSD had gross tremors at rest. Such tremors did not occur when the same dose of LSD was taken alone in these patients (Isbell & Logan, 1957).
When participants were pretreated with a lower dose of 6 mg reserpine in total divided over three doses in the same interval via intramuscular injection prior to 60 μg LSD, they experienced increased irritability and mood depression as well as enhanced neurological changes (Isbell & Logan, 1957). Interestingly, the combination of LSD and reserpine was reported to cause a specific type of hallucination called "jets" or "jet propulsion." This hallucination is characterised by a hissing sound starting from the back of the head and culminating in a flash of light, along with a sensation of flying or being hurled through the air. This hallucination has not been observed when LSD or reserpine is taken alone. Notably, participants that had the same dose of reserpine via intramuscular injection against a lower dose of LSD at 0.5 μg/kg experienced more positive subjective effects, as reflected in the increased number of LSD-related positive answers and clinical grade, without gross tremors (Isbell & Logan, 1957).
Freedman (1963) conducted a study of 14 adult schizophrenic women where the participants were given a single dose of 10 mg reserpine, 2 days prior to 120 μg LSD on test day. All of the participants described that the effects lasted longer and were overall more unpleasant than the control situation without reserpine pretreatment. The experimenters also observed that most of the participants experienced extended periods of tremor and akathisia and in one case, suffered an oculogyric crisis (Freedman, 1963).
Finally, Resnick et al. (1965) examined the effects in three healthy adult males who were treated with 0.5 mg/day of reserpine for two weeks before ingesting 75 μg of LSD. They found that pretreatment with reserpine markedly enhanced the effects of LSD on autonomic and neurologic responses as well as psychological reaction to LSD. Autonomic responses such as blood pressure, heart rate and pupillary size were enhanced and neurologic functions such as cerebellar functions and deep tendon and periosteal reflexes were affected. The psychological reaction to LSD was also enhanced, as indicated by interview, behavioural observation and a symptom rating scale (Resnick et al., 1965).
Other: Azacyclonol and scopolamine
Fabing (1955) conducted a number of experiments to investigate the effect of azacyclonol (brand name Frenquel) on LSD-induced responses. Participants were pretreated with 10-30 mg/day of oral azacyclonol for 1 week and observed that the hallucinatory, conscious and mood-altering effects of LSD were blocked but some small physiological effects such as muscle twitching and nausea remained. They followed up and reported that similar blocking effects were also observed when the participants were pretreated with four doses of 50 mg azacyclonol from 50 hours before the test (Fabing, 1955). They then sought to determine whether the blocking effects of azacyclonol persist after treatment had stopped. The two participants in that experiment reported normal LSD-experiences. One of the participants was administered 40 mg azacyclonol intravenously at the fifth hour post-LSD ingestion and felt less anxious while he realised that he was ‘back in the real world’ again and was able to follow conversations more easily (Fabing, 1955). An independent study by Isbell and Logan (1957) reported no changes in LSD-induced effects were observed in participants treated with 20 mg of azacyclonol 3 times a day for 1 week. A reversal experiment whereby intravenous administration of azacyclonol of 100 mg in divided doses after LSD did not alter the intensity of LSD-reactions (Isbell & Logan, 1957). Similarly, Clark (1956) did not observe any blocking of LSD-effects when the participants were pretreated with Frequel varying from 10 to 40 mg, four times daily for 2 to 5 days. Azacyclonol, when administered intravenously at the height of LSD reaction, did not alter the experience or the duration of effects (Clark, 1956).
The effects of another antidepressant scopolamine were also investigated whereby various doses of scopolamine were subcutaneously administered simultaneously with 1 μg/kg LSD (Isbell et al., 1959). The side effects of scopolamine including pupil dilation, dry mouth and blurred vision increased in a dose-dependent manner and some were more prominent in combination with LSD than LSD alone. Assessment of the mental effects of scopolamine was more complicated. Even though there were an increased number of positive answers after the combination of LSD and scopolamine when compared to LSD alone, the specific responses linked to the positive answers, such as sleepiness and vision blurring, were attributed to scopolamine use alone. The frequency of LSD-specific reactions such as visual perception distortion and optical hallucination were no different in LSD and scopolamine combination when compared to LSD alone (Isbell et al., 1959).
Other: Ketanserin
Few recent studies have investigated the effects of serotonin receptor antagonist ketanserin on the autonomic nervous system following LSD administration. Preller et al. (2018) conducted a study in 24 healthy participants, whereby participants were pretreated with 40 mg oral ketanserin at three different doses two weeks apart with the final dose 60 minutes before treatment with LSD. Neuroimaging scans performed at 75 and 300 minutes after treatment administration showed that ketanserin blocked the global brain connectivity induced by LSD. Notably, the global brain connectivity in somatomotor network is correlated with subjective effects of LSD (Preller et al., 2018). In a double-blind placebo controlled trial, ketanserin pretreatment followed by LSD administration led to a significant shift towards the parasympathetic activity when compared to placebo only or placebo-LSD controls (Olbrich et al., 2021). The shift in autonomic nervous system was also associated with less intense subjective experience of LSD measured by the Five Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) scale (Olbrich et al., 2021). Another independent study by Holze et al. (2021) reported that ketanserin pretreatment blocked the subjective effects of a high dose of 200 μg LSD to levels similar to 25 μg of LSD. The scores for “Anxious Ego-Dissolution” and “Oceanic Boundlessness” as well as any subjective “good” and “bad” drug effects at 200 μg LSD + Ketanserin were similar to 25 μg of LSD. They also observed that the combination significantly lowered the blood pressure, body temperature and heart rate of the participants to similar levels as in placebo controls (Holze et al., 2021). The blocking effects of ketanserin on LSD were also corroborated by Becker et al. (2023) who observed that the participants pretreated with 40 mg ketanserin followed by 100 μg of LSD one hour later, experienced less LSD-induced auditory and visual alterations as well as ego-dissolution and emotional excitement. However, ketanserin pretreatment did not significantly alter overall mystical experiences or plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels induced by LSD. Ketanserin-pretreated participants also experienced shortened duration of LSD-effects from 8.5 to 3.5 hours without any change in pharmacokinetics of LSD (Becker et al., 2023).
Other: Niacin
Agnew and Hoffer (1955) examined the effects of niacin (vitamin B3) on the effects of LSD. Ten healthy adults were administered 200 mg niacin intravenously post LSD administration. Attenuation of LSD effects were observed in all participants and niacin injection markedly diminished the proprioceptive, perceptual and cognitive effects of LSD. However, when participants were pretreated with 3 grams of oral niacin daily for 3 days followed by 100 μg of LSD on test day, the onset of LSD effects was delayed and participants still experienced feelings of unreality and depersonalisation, but without LSD-induced perceptual changes (Agnew & Hoffer, 1955).
Other: Phenoxybenzamine
Isbell et al. (1959) examined the blocking effects of varying doses of phenoxybenzamine pretreatment at 0.5 mg, 1 mg and 1.0 mg/kg that were administered 2 hours prior to 1 μg/kg LSD. None of the doses of phenoxybenzamine significantly altered LSD-induced effects including pupil dilation, pulse rate, blood pressure, knee reflex or subjective positive feelings (Isbell et al., 1959).
Additional case reports
Additionally, there is a report about a 16 year old individual who consumed two doses of LSD while being on fluoxetine (20 mg/day) treatment and developed marked stupor hours after LSD ingestion, followed by focal seizure that progressed to a grand mal convulsion (Picker et al., 1992). However, this report is omitted from our results as the person previously ingested LSD 30 times during fluoxetine treatment without such adverse effects and it is unclear whether the person had any previous experiences with the same batch of LSD.
Psilocybin
A total of 10 studies and 1 case report were identified, describing interactions with anxiolytics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, recreational drugs and other substances.
Anxiolytics: Buspirone
A study conducted by Pokorny et al. (2016) pretreated 19 healthy participants with 20 mg buspirone one hour before the oral ingestion of 0.17 mg/kg psilocybin. Buspirone pretreatment markedly reduced the psilocybin-induced visual hallucinations and to a lesser extent, facilitated imagination but did not affect audio-visual synaesthesia. Additionally, it attenuated the psilocybin-induced loosening of ego-boundaries, changes in sense of time and euphoria (Pokorny et al., 2016).
Antipsychotics: Chlorpromazine
In one study by Keeler (1967), eight healthy volunteers were given either 50 mg of chlorpromazine or placebo two hours before oral administration of 0.2 mg/kg psilocybin. They reported that the participants pretreatment with chlorpromazine experienced significantly decreased psilocybin-induced pupil dilation, visual perception distortion and after-image response (Keeler, 1967).
Antipsychotics: Risperidone and haloperidol
In a randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted by Vollenweider et al. (1998), it was reported that both risperidone and haloperidol reduced the effects of psilocybin. Risperidone affected psilocybin in a dose-dependent manner, with 0.5 mg blocking the effects of psilocybin by 69-78% and 1 mg completely abolishing psilocybin-induced psychosis (98-99%). Haloperidol pretreatment diminished the feelings of oceanic boundlessness and derealization, without affecting visual perception distortions or hallucinations. However, participants who underwent haloperidol treatment experienced increased anxiety and dread of ego-dissolution (Vollenweider et al., 1998).
Antidepressant: Escitalopram
Becker et al. (2022) conducted a randomised placebo-controlled trial involving 23 healthy participants with two experimental test sessions to examine the interaction effects between the antidepressant escitalopram and psilocybin. Briefly, participants were pretreated with 10 mg escitalopram daily for 7 days, followed by 20 mg/day for another 7 days including test day which was ingested 2 hours before 25 mg psilocybin administration. They observed that pretreatment with escitalopram significantly reduced psilocybin-induced ego disintegration and anxiety, but had no effect on depersonalisation, oceanic boundlessness, or euphoria. There were also no significant differences between the groups in overall mystical experiences induced by psilocybin although it was able to reduce acute adverse effects on blood pressure. Notably, escitalopram did not normalise psilocybin-induced increase in plasma BDNF (Becker et al., 2022).
Other: Ketanserin
In a separate experiment, Vollenweider et al. (1998) pretreated 25 healthy volunteers with 20 mg of oral ketanserin or 40 mg of placebo, followed by 0.25 mg/kg psilocybin 75 minutes later. It was reported that ketanserin blocked psilocybin-induced psychosis in a dose-dependent manner. Pretreatment with 20 mg of ketanserin reduced the altered state of consciousness induced by psilocybin by 50-70%, while 40 mg of ketanserin completely prevented the effects of psilocybin in 4 out of 5 participants. In the remaining participant, the effects of psilocybin were markedly reduced by 75-87% (Vollenweider et al., 1998). Similarly, Carter et al. (2005) pretreated 8 healthy participants with 50 mg oral ketanserin 90 minutes prior to 0.215 mg/kg psilocybin and examined the effects on attentional tracking ability and spatial working memory as well as subjective effects. Ketanserin significantly blocked the subjective effects of psilocybin including “Oceanic Boundlessness” (depersonalisation, euphoria), “Anxious Ego Dissolution” (ego-disintegration, anxiety) and “Visual Restructuralization” (hallucinations, synaesthesia) but not “Auditory alterations” or “Reduction of Vigilance” which measures acoustic hallucinations and reduced alertness respectively. However, ketanserin pretreatment did not rescue the psilocybin-induced decrease on attentional tracking ability, whereby participants were to track specific coloured disk on the monitor along with other coloured disks, the disks were then all coloured the same during the prompt and the user has to select the correct disk of a target colour (Carter et al., 2005). They followed up with another experiment (Carter et al., 2007) with the same experimental design but examined the effects on binocular rivalry whereby participants were presented with two incongruent images which typically results in perceptual alternation between the two images. Pretreatment with ketanserin did not alter the psilocybin-induced slowing of binocular rivalry. However, ketanserin pretreatment has consistently lowered the psilocybin-induced effects on Oceanic Boundlessness, Anxious Ego Dissolution and Visual Restructuralization scores without affecting the “Reduction of Vigilance” score as well as the arousal score which is a new addition to a more recent version of 5D-ASC (Carter et al., 2007).
Other: Ergotamine
Pokorny et al. (2016) conducted a study whereby 17 participants were pretreated with 3 mg ergotamine 100 minutes before the oral administration of 0.17 mg/kg. They observed that ergotamine pretreatment did not significantly alter any of the psilocybin-induced effects including sense of euphoria, alteration to sense of time, anxious ego disintegration, or visual hallucinations based on the 5D-ASC score (Pokorny et al., 2016).
Recreational drugs: Alcohol and cannabis
Barrett et al. (2000) conducted a retrospective self-report study to examine the effects of non-intoxicating levels of alcohol on psilocybin when consumed either before or after psychedelic ingestion. Fifteen participants underwent structured interviews consisting of a series of standardised open-ended questions: “Have you ever used alcohol while under the influence of psychedelic or psychedelic while under the influence of alcohol?”, “Did you notice any difference in the effect of either the alcohol or psychedelic when you used the two together?”,“What was the nature of the difference?”. The answers were rated on a five-point Likert scale by the investigators. The subjective effects of alcohol are partially antagonised by psilocybin whereby users reported diminished response to alcohol but none of the users reported complete blocking of alcohol effects. However, 80% of the participants did not experience any difference in effects of psilocybin when consumed together with alcohol (Barrett et al., 2000).
Espiard et al. (2005) reported a case of an 18-year old student who was hospitalised for chronic perceptual impairments and dysphoric mood lasting for 8 months. Further questioning revealed that the perceptual distortions initially appeared after ingestion of infusion made of 40 Psilocybe semilanceata mushrooms, which appeared again the next day during a cannabis consumption. The symptoms faded after the discontinuation of cannabis use but then increased again 6 months later. The subject was then diagnosed with hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD). The authors concluded that psilocybin consumption led to the hallucinatory experience in the chronic cannabis smoker and continuation of cannabis consumption could potentially stimulate the reappearance of the symptoms (Espiard et al., 2005).
Mescaline
A total of 1 study and 3 case series/reports were identified, describing interactions with antipsychotics, antidepressants and other compounds.
Antipsychotics: Chlorpromazine
In one study, 25 schizophrenic patients received either mescaline by intravenous injection or oral LSD, followed by chlorpromazine or promazine intravenous injection (Lesse, 1958). The authors noted that the anxiety caused by mescaline and LSD administration was abolished in 68% (17 out of 25) of the participants by chlorpromazine or promazine. No details were given on the number of patients who received mescaline or LSD or on the doses and timing of administration.
Antidepressants: Azacyclonol
Another study investigated azacyclonol (Frenquel) as a blocking agent for mescaline effects (Fabing, 1955). They used four healthy patients, two of whom received pretreatment with 50 mg azacyclonol at 50, 38, 26 and 2 hours before ingesting 400 mg of mescaline sulphate, while the other two received placebo pretreatment and 100 mg intravenous injections of azacyclonol at 4.5 and 5 hours, respectively. The patients who received azacyclonol as pretreatment developed nausea and minor subjective effects (such as feeling tension in leg muscles and disruptions in thought continuity), but did not experience hallucinations or other psychic accompaniments. One of the other two patients experienced euphoria and sensations of levitation with brightened colours, while the other two developed somatic hallucinations and extreme coldness (vomited at the 4th hour). After receiving a 100 mg intravenous treatment of azacyclonol, the effects of mescaline were blocked, and both patients returned to “normal” within an hour.
Case reports
A self-experiment was conducted by Clark (1956), who took azacyclonol four times a day for three days before ingesting 200 mg and 400 mg of mescaline sulphate. He reported that the intoxications were identical in all respects to those he previously experienced after taking the same doses without azacyclonol pretreatment, and did not experience any blocking effect of azacyclonol (Clark, 1956).
Another self-experiment conducted by Dittrich (1971), who used mescaline in combination with 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-O). He designed a blind experiment in which he first ingested 300 mg of 2C-O, then 100 mg and 200 mg of 2C-O with mescaline, and finally 250 mg of mescaline alone. He did not experience any subjective effects while taking 2C-O alone. In regards to the experiment with pretreatment, he observed differences in two tests. Mescaline was shown to decrease performance in a test measuring concentration on optical details, while pretreatment with 2C-O resulted in even greater deterioration of performance than mescaline alone. The time to complete a test (semantic differential) was measured and increased under mescaline compared to placebo and even further after pretreatment with 2C-O (Dittrich, 1971).
DMT and ayahuasca
A total of 3 studies were identified for DMT, describing interactions with antidepressants as well as other substances. One case report was found for ayahuasca.
Antidepressants (MAOI)
In an experimental study by Sai Halasz (1963), seven volunteers (four males and three females aged between 21-36 years) were pre-treated with the MAOI iproniazid for four days, followed by a two-day washout period to eliminate the direct effect of iproniazid while preserving its MAOI activity. On the fifth day, two individuals received a reduced dose of DMT (0.35-0.55 mg/kg), while the other five received a dose of 0.65-0.83 mg/kg.
The individuals who received the reduced dose of DMT reported no significant changes in their perception of time, space, or sensory experiences. However, they reported an "odd" or "strange" feeling, which they found difficult to describe. The five volunteers who received the higher DMT dose experienced two distinct phases of effects. The first phase lasted 14-24 minutes and was similar to the effects of DMT, albeit less pronounced. They reported seeing a few hallucinations, which lacked vivid colours and only occurred with their eyes closed. In the second phase, the hallucinations disappeared and their perception of time and space returned to baseline levels. However, the feeling of oddness remained and even intensified (Sai Halasz, 1963).
Other: racemic pindolol and methysergide
In a four-cell double-blind randomised study by Strassman (1996), twelve volunteers received a sub-hallucinogenic dose (0.1 mg/kg) of intravenous DMT or saline placebo, in combination with either 30 mg of oral racemic pindolol or placebo-pindolol. The results of the study showed that pindolol (a potent 5-HT1A antagonist) pre-treatment enhanced DMT effects by two to three times, which was substantiated by scores on the hallucinogen rating scale. Four to six clinical clusters (affect, volition, somatic effects, perception, cognition and intensity) demonstrated a significant enhancement by pindolol. Heart rate responses were blunted, probably due to pindolol’s anti-sympathetic effects, while mean arterial blood pressure effects were enhanced. Prolactin responses were reduced, while those of adrenocorticotropin were unaffected (Strassman, 1996).
In a quasi-experimental study by Sai-Halasz (1962), 40 patients (20 males and 20 females aged between 18-44 years) received a DMT dose of 0.76-1.03 mg/kg. Two to three months later, 15 of those individuals participated in the second experiment. Seven of them were administered the same dose as the first time (0.81-0.89 mg/kg DMT), while eight patients had their dose reduced to 50-80% of their first dose. In the second experiment, the participants were pre-treated with methysergide (1-methyllysergic acid butanolamide), a compound structurally similar to LSD and a serotonergic antagonist but without psychic effects. Methysergide was administered perorally (1-2 mg) 30-40 min before DMT or intramuscularly (0.5 mg) 10 min before DMT. Out of the seven patients who received the same DMT dose as the first time, five individuals reported very intense aggravation of DMT subjective effects, such as more intense hallucinations, more brilliant colours, deeper loss of time and perception and lost all relation with the world, unlike the first time. The other two individuals reported heightened subjective effects of DMT, but not to such a marked degree. Four individuals who took 65-80% less DMT than their first time experienced similar effects as their first experience. The four individuals who took 50-60% of their first-time dose did not experience a more pronounced hallucinatory state than their first experience. In one case, the effects were even less pronounced (Sai-Halasz, 1962).
Case reports
There was one case report by Callaway and Grob (1998) of a 36-year-old male individual who was receiving fluoxetine treatment (20 mg/day) and who participated in a ceremonial ayahuasca session. Approximately one hour after ingesting about 100 ml of ayahuasca, the patient developed sweating, shivering, tremors and confusion, which gradually progressed and led to severe nausea, vomiting and disorientation. The patient did not receive any treatment and the symptoms subsided after four hours following the ingestion of ayahuasca (Callaway & Grob, 1998).
Additionally, another case report by Bakim et al. (2012) involved a 42 year old male who received a combination of quetiapine at a daily dose of 1000 mg and fluoxetine at a daily dose of 40 mg. While the individual did not consume ayahuasca and therefore not included in the main results, he did ingest a spoonful of harmal (Peganum harmala) to treat his haemorrhoids, a plant used in ayahuasca brew. Two hours after ingestion of harmal the individual developed symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, sweating, tremors, followed by confusion with visual hallucinations, agitation and loss of orientation and was diagnosed with serotonin syndrome. Symptoms resolved within 24 hours after starting the treatment with cyproheptadine, chlorpromazine and diazepam (Bakim et al., 2012).
Discussion
In this systematic review, a total of 8,487 records were screened and 34 reports of 50 studies were included, providing information about the potential drug-drug interactions (or the lack of) of classic psychedelics in the scientific literature. The results of this review provide insights into the potential for DDIs with classic psychedelics and highlight the need for further research in this area. In light of the scarcity of studies addressing DDIs involving classic psychedelics, case reports were included to provide more insights into DDIs. Although anecdotal in nature, these case reports highlight potential DDIs and present promising areas for future research.
Classic psychedelics are known to bind to 5-HT2A receptors where their hallucinogenic properties are thought to be mediated with (Vollenweider & Smallridge, 2022). Results of multiple studies on drugs that are 5-HT2A receptor antagonists, such as ketanserin, trazodone, risperidone and chlorpromazine, indicated that they were all effective in attenuating the effects of LSD and psilocybin. Specifically, ketanserin, a 5-HT2A antagonist (strong affinity) was found in all studies to either fully block or reduce the effects of LSD (Becker et al., 2023; Holze et al., 2021; Olbrich et al., 2021; Preller et al., 2018) and psilocybin (Carter et al., 2005, 2007; Vollenweider et al., 1998). Interestingly, while it has been shown that 5-HT2A blocking with ketanserin diminished the hallucinogenic, depersonalization and derealization effects of LSD, it did not affect the mystical experiences, suggesting these effects could be modulated by other mechanisms (Becker et al., 2023). Furthermore, risperidone, which is a 5-HT2A and also D2 antagonist was found to attenuate similar effects of psilocybin in a dose-dependent manner (Vollenweider et al., 1998). Trazodone, another 5-HT2A antagonist (Balsara et al., 2005), was shown to reduce the psychological and hallucinogenic effects of LSD in one case report (Bonson et al., 1996).
The effects of chlorpromazine, which similarly is a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist but also has affinity for D2 and adrenoceptor α1A and α1B subtypes (Boyd-Kimball et al., 2019; Gillman, 1999), are inconsistent across different studies. While two studies (Isbell & Logan, 1957; Murphree, 1962) found that chlorpromazine reduced the intensity of LSD-induced effects as well as anxiety, another two independent studies (Abramson et al., 1960; Schwarz, 1967) reported the opposite. Similarly, while Isbell & Logan (1957) reported that oral pre-administration of chlorpromazine blocked LSDs effects and not post-administration, then Abramson, et al. (1960) observed enhanced effects despite whether it was administered before or after LSD intake. However, the inconsistent findings regarding the effects of chlorpromazine on LSD response may be due to differences in study design, dosing regimens and individual variability. Moreover, chlorpromazine was reported to have blocking action also for psilocybin and mescaline, where its pretreatment significantly decreased psilocybin-induced visual perception distortion (Keeler, 1967) and abolished the increased anxiety observed in schizophrenic patients following mescaline ingestion (Lesse, 1958).
Pretreatment with buspirone, which is a 5-HT1A partial agonist, markedly reduced the psilocybin-induced visual hallucinations (Pokorny et al., 2016). On the contrary, agonism of 5-HT1A with ergotamine did not affect any of the psilocybin effects (Pokorny et al., 2016). However, given that ergotamine has lower efficacy at receptor signal transduction when compared to buspirone and its general low bioavailability, it was suggested that the administered dose may not have been high enough to compete with psilocybin at those receptor site (Pokorny et al., 2016). Those findings indicate that 5-HT1A receptors may be also involved in the manifestation of psilocybin-induced effects such as visual hallucinations, affective alterations, derealization and depersonalization. The mechanism of action by which buspirone reduces hallucinations may involve direct stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors, or alternatively, interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors on pyramidal cells due to co-expression of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in cortical and visual areas (Pokorny et al., 2016). Despite both psilocin and buspirone being partial agonists at 5-HT1A receptors, the blocking effect of buspirone may be due to a more effective inhibitory impact on pyramidal neurons compared to psilocin (Pokorny et al., 2016).
Buspirone is also an antagonist for dopamine D2 receptors (low affinity) and has shown weak affinity to the 5-HT2 receptors (Loane & Politis, 2012), which could have a role in modulating the effects of psilocybin as well. However, while LSD is known to have an effect on the dopaminergic system (important on perceived selfhood and cognition) (Lawn et al., 2022) and it has high affinity for both D1 and D2 receptors (Halberstadt & Geyer, 2011), then psilocin does not bind to dopamine receptors (Halberstadt & Geyer, 2011). Moreover, D2 antagonism alone by haloperidol did not have an effect on psilocybin-induced hallucinations (Vollenweider et al., 1998). Haloperidol did, however, diminish the feelings of oceanic boundlessness and derealization and also increased anxiety (Vollenweider et al., 1998). In particular, psilocybin may exert an indirect impact on dopaminergic systems, which is subsequently counteracted by haloperidol (Vollenweider et al., 1998). It has been also shown in rats that psilocybin administration can increase extracellular dopamine levels in frontal cortex (Wojtas et al., 2022) and psilocin administration has also increased dopamine levels in nucleus accumbens (Sakashita et al., 2015).
Interestingly, blocking of serotonin reuptake transporters with SSRIs, such as fluoxetine, sertraline and paroxetine, reduced the effects of LSD as reported in one study (Bonson et al., 1996). Moreover, fluoxetine also delayed onset of LSD effects in nearly half of the participants in the same study (Bonson et al., 1996) and was shown to markedly decrease sensitivity to LSD in one individual (Strassman, 1992). Trazodone, which was previously described to reduce LSD effects as it is a 5-HT2A antagonist, is also a serotonin receptor antagonist and reuptake inhibitor (SARI) (Fagiolini et al., 2012) that might contribute to the observed LSD effects. Potentially, SSRIs and SARIs are increasing extracellular serotonin by inhibiting its uptake, which can then attenuate effects of psychedelics via receptor competition with the endogenous serotonin. In addition, it is known that repeated administration of SSRIs desensitises 5-HT2A receptors which may reduce the cell’s response to psychedelics on binding those receptors (Gray & Roth, 2001). Chronic SSRI use can desensitise 5-HT1A raphe autoreceptors resulting in more serotonin release (Artigas et al., 2001).
However, one SSRI, escitalopram, did not have an effect on psilocybin-induced positive mood or mind-altering effects and also reduced the adverse effects such as anxiety (Becker et al., 2022). The authors hypothesise that while LSD does not affect the serotonin transporter, psilocin has a weak inhibitory effect on it (Rickli et al., 2016). This distinction in pharmacology could lead to different interactions between antidepressants and LSD compared to psilocybin (Becker et al., 2022). Although this study offers important insights into the safety of administering psilocybin to patients taking escitalopram, it’s crucial to bear in mind that the study’s treatment phase was 14 days. Longer treatment periods with escitalopram that may often last for years could lead to distinct outcomes due to molecular changes that occur over extended periods (Faure et al., 2006).
SSRIs can also result in DDI on pharmacokinetic level as some of them, such as fluoxetine, are potent inhibitors of CYP2D6 enzymes (Brøsen, 1998), which can modulate the effects of psychedelics that are being metabolised by such enzymes. For example, CYP2D6 enzymatic activity is already known to affect LSD’s effects (Vizeli et al., 2021). However, in case of a reduced CYP2D6 activity, a stronger and longer response would have been expected for LSD, which was not seen for fluoxetine, sertraline and paroxetine. Ultimately, it can be an interplay between different molecular actions, including interactions with enzymes, receptor availability and other molecular factors.
Results from another antidepressant class, MAOIs, showed a similar outcome to SSRIs. In particular, phenelzine, isocarboxazid, nialamide and iproniazid are all non-specific MAO inhibitors, therefore inhibiting both MAO-A and MAO-B. The first three listed antidepressants attenuated or blocked the effects of LSD (Bonson & Murphy, 1996; Grof & Dytrych, 1965; Resnick et al., 1964). In contrast, the latter, iproniazid, did not alter the subjective or physical effects of LSD (DeMaar et al., 1960). However, iproniazid was also used in the experiments with DMT where it was showed to reduce the effects of DMT as well (Sai Halasz, 1963). This particular finding is interesting as iproniazid is an irreversible MAOI (Entzeroth & Ratty, 2017) and inhibits the enzyme that rapidly metabolises DMT (Barker et al., 1980). Moreover, studies in rats have shown that iproniazid pretreatment increases levels of DMT in the brain, as well as in the liver, kidney and blood (Sitaram et al., 1987). However, the reduced DMT effect could be due to increased serotonin levels after blocking MAO and it is hypothesised that higher doses of DMT are needed when serotonin levels are elevated (Sai Halasz, 1963). It is suggested that ayahuasca’s effect is mediated by MAO inhibition in the digestive system or bloodstream, which protects DMT from metabolism during its journey to the brain, where MAO inhibitors can then attenuate DMT’s effects due to elevated brain serotonin (Ott, 1996). This hypothesis can also explain the similar outcome observed in LSD studies.
Besides metabolising DMT, MAOIs are also important in the breakdown of serotonin as they are blocking MAO enzymes involved in its metabolism (Foong et al., 2018). This creates a potential situation of excessive serotonin in the brain. In particular, when combining MAOIs with each other or with SSRI or SNRI, it carries the greatest risk of serotonin toxicity (Foong et al., 2018). In one case report, symptoms resembling serotonin toxicity were reported after an individual administered ayahuasca while being on a fluoxetine treatment (Callaway & Grob, 1998). However, the patient also recovered rapidly in four hours after administration of ayahuasca without any treatment. Moreover, another case study that was not included in the review, documented an instance of serotonin toxicity in an individual who had been undergoing fluoxetine and quetiapine treatment while consuming pure harmal extracted from Peganum harmala, which is a component of ayahuasca (Bakim et al., 2012).
Ayahuasca brew is usually made from a plant containing DMT, and another plant that contains β-carbolines which mostly inhibit MAO-A and therefore, making DMT orally active (McKenna, 2004). Tetrahydroharmine, one of the β-carbolines present in the brew, can also act as a weak serotonin uptake inhibitor and increase brain serotonin levels (Airaksinen et al., 1980). Fluoxetine strongly inhibits the CYP2D6 enzyme that metabolises many drugs, including serotonin. The simultaneous inhibition of serotonin uptake and serotonin-metabolising enzymes such as CYP2D6 and MAO can lead to excessive serotonin concentration in the brain and low clearance, resulting in life-threatening serotonin toxicity (Dunkley et al., 2003), which could explain the described case reports.
One study that reported blocking action on LSD effects was using a high dose of niacin (vitamin B3). Pretreatment with niacin resulted in delayed onset of LSD-effects and prevented most of the perceptual changes from occurring, and administration post-LSD ingestion attenuated all effects of LSD within 5 minutes (Agnew & Hoffer, 1955). The blocking mechanism of niacin is not clear, but might be due to increased serotonin levels. In particular, niacin has been shown to induce serotonin release from human platelets within a few minutes and to increase rat plasma serotonin levels (Papaliodis et al., 2008). Secondly, blocking 5-HT2A receptors with ketanserin inhibits niacin-induced temperature increase (Papaliodis et al., 2008), which indicates serotonin involvement in niacin’s effects. Finally, high-dose treatment with niacin has caused manic-like psychotic episodes that are thought to be via stimulating serotonin and dopamine production (Loebl & Raskin, 2013).
There were several studies that reported potentiated effects of LSD. In one, desipramine, imipramine and clomipramine, which are all tricyclic antidepressants, were shown to increase psychological effects (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). Desipramine is a potent inhibitor of noradrenaline reuptake, while imipramine and clomipramine exhibit a lower degree of noradrenaline as well as serotonin reuptake inhibition. Furthermore, clomipramine also functions as a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist and also imipramine has affinity for this receptor subtype (Gillman, 2007).
Since TCAs were reported to enhance the effects of LSD despite some of them inhibiting serotonin uptake and are even 5-HT2A receptor antagonists (similar to SSRIs which decreased the effects of LSD), it is suggested another mechanism can contribute. For instance, chronic administration of TCAs like desipramine can increase the sensitivity of certain neurons to LSD, suggesting that these medications may sensitise postsynaptic serotonin receptors in the brain and therefore be more responsive to LSD (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). Alternatively, the effects can be enhanced through a dopaminergic system (Bonson & Murphy, 1996) as chronic use of desipramine has been demonstrated to result in an elevated behavioural response to amphetamine, whereas chronic use of fluoxetine did not have the same effect (Spyraki & Fibiger, 1981). Therefore, it is possible that the observed effects are due to a modification in the sensitivity of dopamine receptors. It is shown that chronic administration of imipramine increases the affinity of D2 receptors for agonists and clomipramine is a potent inhibitor of dopamine reuptake (Bonson & Murphy, 1996; Randrup & Braestrup, 1977).
Additionally, from the same study, it was reported that chronic lithium use potentiated LSD effects and brought the onset earlier (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). It is suggested that while acute administration of lithium increases serotonin levels in the brain, chronic administration on the other hand reduces serotonin concentrations (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). This may explain why long-term lithium use enhances LSD effects, as LSD acts as an agonist in the absence of endogenous serotonin resulting in the observed behavioural effects (Bonson & Murphy, 1996). It is important to note that those findings and some anecdotal reports that can be found on internet forums suggesting a similar outcome, there are also several reports of lithium causing seizures when used concurrently with LSD or psilocybin (Nayak et al., 2021).
Intensified and prolonged (negative) effects of LSD were also reported in individuals being pretreated with reserpine, an antihypertensive drug, in three separate studies (Freedman, 1963; Isbell & Logan, 1957; Resnick et al., 1965). Freedman (1963) and Isbell & Logan (1957) both reported tremors that were present after LSD and reserpine combination. Tremors were not observed during LSD use alone (Isbell & Logan, 1957), and when combined with reserpine, the experience was reported to be less pleasant and lasted longer than LSD use alone (Freedman, 1963). Furthermore, specific types of hallucinations were reported with reserpine treatment that were not observed during LSD use alone. Overall, individuals were reporting unpleasant experiences when combining LSD with reserpine.
Reserpine has the ability to bind to storage vesicles of certain neurotransmitters, including dopamine and norepinephrine. This binding inhibits the catecholamine pumps and blocks the uptake of serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine into presynaptic storage vesicles. Ultimately, this leads to a depletion of these neurotransmitters by cytoplasmic MAO at both central and peripheral synapses (Cheung & Parmar, 2023). Lower serotonin levels can enhance LSD effects, which was noted for lithium as well. In contrast to reserpine effects, when LSD was used chronically with lithium, it had positive effects and resulted in more vivid hallucinations without any noted increase in negative psychological or physical side effects. Reserpine treatment has been known to cause several neurological side effects (Cheung & Parmar, 2023) and studies have shown that it can lead to the development or exacerbation of anxiety in patients with anxiety (Peterfy et al., 1976; Sarwer-Foner & Ogle, 1956). Since LSD can also increase anxiety as a side effect (Strassman, 1984), it is possible that reserpine treatment could enhance this effect (or vice versa) meanwhile LSD modulates the noted hallucinogenic effects due to depleted serotonin levels.
Moreover, reserpine is also a potent inhibitor of both CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 enzymes (Englund et al., 2014), which are involved in the initial metabolic steps of LSD (Wagmann et al., 2019). This inhibition may account for the reported prolonged effects of LSD when it was used with reserpine (Freedman, 1963) as it could potentially decrease the metabolism of LSD. Finally, reserpine acts as an inhibitor of P-gp as well (Englund et al., 2014), which can lead to increased concentrations of P-gp substrates. However, no research has been conducted to investigate the impact of P-gp activity on LSD pharmacokinetics and its effects, making it difficult to assess the potential contribution of inhibited P-gp.
A 5-HT1 receptor antagonist, racemic pindolol was reported to intensify the effects of DMT (Strassman, 1996). Pindolol is a β-adrenoceptor and 5-HT1A antagonist (high affinity) (Artigas et al., 2001). Authors suggested a buffering effect of 5-HT1A that was blocking the 5-HT2 mediated psychedelic effects (Strassman, 1996). However, pindolol has been shown to accelerate, and in some cases, enhance antidepressant effects of SSRIs. This can be via antagonising 5-HT1A autoreceptors in midbrain raphe and, as a result, prevent the inhibition of serotonin release (Artigas et al., 2001). DMT is a full agonist at 5-HT1A receptors and has higher affinity for it than it has for 5-HT2A receptors where it is weak partial agonist (Kozell et al., 2023). Hypothetically, a similar effect as for SSRIs has been described, can modulate the effects of DMT as well, which can have enhanced effects via activating postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors while 5-HT1A autoreceptors are blocked.
A 5-HT1 receptor agonist and 5-HT2 receptor antagonist methysergide was similarly shown to potentiate DMT’s effects (Sai-Halasz, 1962). This finding adds more weight on the 5-HT1A receptor contribution to the DMT’s effects, especially considering the methysergide also an antagonist at 5-HT2A receptors.
With regards to mescaline use and potentiated effects, one case report involved the use of 2C-O, a structural isomer to mescaline that did not appear to have psychedelic properties on its own (Dittrich, 1971). However, when used together with mescaline, a synergistic effect may have occurred that potentiated mescaline’s effects described in the case report.
Azacyclonol, once investigated as potential antidepressants, was experimented on individuals taking LSD and mescaline. Two studies showed no effect of blocking LSD’s actions (Clark, 1956; Isbell & Logan, 1957) and one case report describes the same for mescaline (Clark, 1956). Those results are in contrast to another study that reported attenuated (pretreatment) or blocked (acute) effects of mescaline after azacyclonol treatment (Fabing, 1955). The mechanism of action of azacyclonol is not well understood, and the mixed results from studies make it difficult to draw firm conclusions and hypotheses.
Finally, two studies reported the effects of recreational drugs, such as alcohol and cannabis consumption on LSD or psilocybin. In one case report, cannabis induced hallucinogen= persisting perception disorder (Espiard et al., 2005). The second study, which investigated the effects of alcohol, found that LSD and psilocybin (to a lesser extent) acted as antagonists to the subjective effects of alcohol, while their own psychedelic effects were mainly not affected (Barrett et al., 2000). It is suggested that LSD may block the subjective effects of alcohol by interacting with 5HT1B and 5HT1C receptors, which are implicated in the formation of the ethanol cue. Evidence shows that agonists of these receptors produce responses similar to alcohol, while blockade of these receptors interferes with alcohol’s discriminative stimulus properties (Barrett et al., 2000).
Limitations
One of the limitations of this study is the inclusion of a number of old research articles, particularly those published between the 1950s and 1970s, where many of them provided limited information about the outcomes and/or methods used. Additionally, the limited number of total studies included in this review led to the inclusion of case reports, which may be subject to bias and provide limited generalizability to larger populations. This review may have also missed some relevant studies that were published only in non-English languages, which were more common in the early days of research.
Conclusions
Psychedelic substances like LSD and psilocybin have been found to impact multiple serotonin receptors in the brain, with the 5-HT2A receptor being the most studied in relation to their hallucinogenic effects. However, limited research suggests that other serotonin receptors, such as 5-HT1A/B and dopamine receptors, along with altered serotonin levels, may also modulate the effects of psychedelics. Additionally, a small number of studies indicate a potentially important role of the 5-HT1 receptor subtype in modulating DMT’s effects. It is noteworthy that while different psychedelics can have similar effects, their pharmacological properties are different and therefore can produce varying responses to the same drug.
In this systematic review, we observed a range of effects between classic psychedelics and psychoactive drugs, whereby psychedelic effects were either altered or remained unchanged. Overall, further research is needed to enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in psychedelic modulation and to gather more evidence regarding potential serious adverse drug reactions that may arise from the combination of psychedelics with other drugs, beyond what has been published thus far.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
Declarations
Competing interests
JS and DP are directors of a not-for-profit research institute which has in the past received commercial funding to undertake psychedelic medicines research.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Eleanor White for her contribution to an earlier version of the introduction.
References
