Abstract
Lower limb loss is a significant insult to the body’s nervous and musculoskeletal systems. Despite technological advances in prosthesis design, artificial limbs are not yet integrated into the body’s physiological systems. Therefore, lower limb amputees (LLAs) experience lower balance confidence, higher fear of falls, and impaired gait mechanics compared to their able-bodied peers (ABs). Restoring sensations perceived as originating directly from the missing limb via implanted neural interfaces were shown to improve balance and performance in certain ambulatory tasks; however, the effects of such evoked sensations on neural circuitries involved in the locomotor activity are not well understood. In this work, we investigated the effects of plantar sensation elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation delivered by multi-contact nerve cuff electrodes on gait symmetry and stability, speed perception, and motor adaptation during walking. We found that restored plantar sensation increased stance time and propulsive force on the prosthetic side, improved gait symmetry, and yielded an enhanced perception of prosthetic limb movement. Most importantly, our results show the locomotor adaptation among LLAs with plantar sensation became similar to ABs. These findings suggest that our peripheral nerve-based approach to elicit plantar sensation directly affects central nervous pathways involved in locomotion and motor adaptation during walking. Our neuroprosthesis provided a unique model to investigate the role of somatosensation in the lower limb during walking and its effects on perceptual recalibration following a locomotor adaptation task. Furthermore, we demonstrated how plantar sensation in LLAs could effectively increase mobility, improve walking dynamics, and possibly reduce fall risks.
One-Sentence Summary Neuroprosthesis stabilizes gait and improves speed perception and locomotor adaptation in individuals with lower limb loss.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03409133
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by the Department of Defense under Awards No. W81XWH-18-1-0321 and W81XWH-20-1-0802. In addition, this material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved all experimental procedures. Portions of this study involving the SNP were conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration (IDE G110043).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Materials.
