Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to validate Hospital at Home as an appropriate care option for patients of certain diagnostic-related groups and acuity levels.
Patients and methods We compared outcomes for patients in a Hospital at Home program at Virtua Health in 2022 (N = 272) to traditional inpatients at Virtua hospitals during the same year who did not participate in the Hospital at Home program (N = 13879). We defined outcomes as recommendations for subacute rehabilitation (SAR) and final disposition upon inpatient discharge. Specifically, we searched electronic medical records for terms related to recommendation for SAR and discharge to SAR using text mining algorithms and a natural language processing (NLP) model to confirm these recommendations.
Results We observed that the proportion of patients in the Hospital at Home program that were recommended for SAR (0.147) was significantly different from the proportion of patients who remained in the hospital (0.361). Further, of those patients who received a recommendation, only 1 patient in the Hospital at Home group was discharged to SAR, while nearly half of those in the control group (proportion = 0.499) were transferred to SAR.
Conclusion The Hospital at Home program is a promising alternative to traditional inpatient care for patients with certain diagnoses and who meet certain clinical criteria.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are employed by a healthcare system.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Virtua Health gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are not available in order to comply with agreements made with the ethics committee (IRB).
