Abstract
Merging genetic risk, neurological phenotypes, and clinical presentation is a primary goal for psychiatry. Pursuing this goal, we tested association between phenotypes and overall and pathway-specific polygenic risk in patients with early-stage psychosis. Subjects included 206 demographically diverse cases with a psychotic disorder and 115 matched controls with comprehensive psychiatric and neurological phenotyping. DNA was extracted from blood and genotyped. We calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) using Psychiatric Genomics Consortium GWAS summary statistics. To dissect convergent mechanisms of symptoms, we calculated pathway PGSs (pPGSs) for SZ risk affecting each of four major neurotransmitter systems: glutamate, GABA, dopamine, and serotonin. Psychosis subjects had elevated SZ and BP PGS versus controls; cases with SZ or BP diagnoses had stronger SZ or BP risk, respectively. There was no significant association between individual symptom measures and overall PGS. However, neurotransmitter-specific pPGSs were significantly associated with specific symptoms; most notably, increased glutamatergic pPGS was associated with deficits in cognitive control and altered cortical activation during cognitive control task-based fMRI. Finally, unbiased symptom-driven clustering identified three diagnostically mixed case groups with distinct symptom profiles that separated on primary deficits of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, global functioning, and cognitive control. These clusters had specific genetic risk profiles and differential response to treatment, and outperformed diagnosis in predicting glutamate and GABA pPGS. Our findings suggest pathway-based PGS analysis may be a powerful path forward for identifying convergent mechanisms driving psychotic disorders and linking genetic risk with endophenotypes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIMH grant R01MH059883, the UC Davis-HKU Collaboration Grant, the UC Davis LaMP T32 (NIMH T32MH112507), and the NIMH NRSA F31MH129135.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of UC Davis gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.