Abstract
Background Psychiatric hospital admissions in the Western Cape are increasing, driven by poverty and substance use.
Aim To assess the trend of psychiatric admissions from 2015-2022 and factors associated with repeat psychiatric admissions and linkage to ambulatory services post-discharge.
Setting Public hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa
Methods Using electronic data from the Provincial Health Data Centre, a consolidated routine service database, all psychiatric hospital admissions in the Western Cape were analyzed, stratified by hospital level. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with successful linkage to ambulatory services within 30 days following hospital discharge, and repeat psychiatric admission within 30 and 90 days.
Results Psychiatric hospital admissions, particularly at the district/acute level, were increasing prior to 2020 and an increasing proportion were substance related. 40% of admissions at the district level had not been seen at a primary health care facility in the year prior to admission. Males and those with substance use disorders were less likely to be successfully linked to outpatient services post-discharge. Successful linkage was most protective against readmission within 90 days with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.76 (95%CI 0.73-0.79) and 0.45 (95%CI 0.42-0.49) at district/acute and specialized hospitals respectively.
Conclusion Improving linkage to ambulatory services for mental health patients post-discharge is likely to avert hospital readmissions.
Contribution This research highlights how often mental health patients requiring admissions are not seen at the primary health care level and quantifies the risk for readmission of not following up psychiatric admissions post-discharge.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness, as well as by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (193381) and from the National Institutes of Health for the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS Southern Africa Collaboration (IeDEA-SA) (U01 AI069924).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the University of Cape Town Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC 058 /2023).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author contributions
HH conceptualized the research, performed the formal analysis and visualization, and wrote the original draft
TM & AH were responsible for data curation
CD, LH, MR, GP assisted with the conceptualization of the research
QC, LK, WC, VL, DP and AB assisted with reviewing and editing
KS and HM assisted with reviewing and editing, as well as supervision
This version of the manuscript has been updated to reflect the correct funding information and edited down for word count.
Data Availability
The underlying data are routinely collected patient records that have been de-identified and pseudo-anonymised. The patients have not consented to these data being part of publicly accessible repositories considering the inherent risks of re-identification.The Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness evaluates research proposals for all research in the public health sector in the province, subject to standard research ethics, government approval and data governance prescripts. This includes those that draw on routine datasets like the current study. For more information email Health.Research{at}westerncape.gov.za.
