ABSTRACT
Objective Reading difficulties frequently co-occur with other neurodevelopmental/behavioral conditions. It is difficult to assess reading routinely in Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics (DBP) clinical practice due to time/resource constraints. Rapid Online Assessment of Reading (ROAR) is a gamified assessment that children take in a web-browser without adult supervision. This study’s purpose was to evaluate ROAR as a screening tool for reading difficulties in a DBP clinic.
Method Patients, ages 6-14 years, attending a DBP clinic, were invited to participate. Children took ROAR and completed the Woodcock-Johnson Letter-Word Identification (LWID) and Word Attack (WA). Basic Reading Skills (BRS), a standardized aggregate score of LWID and WA, was used as the gold standard assessment. The strength of association between age-adjusted standard score on ROAR and BRS was calculated. BRS scores < 90 (bottom quartile of sample) were deemed poor reader. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the quality of ROAR as a screening test.
Results A total of 41 children, 78% boys, mean age 9.5 years (SD 2.0 years), completed the study. The correlation of ROAR standard score with BRS was r = 0.66, p<0.001. ROC curve classification analysis with ROAR scores accurately classified poor readers with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90.
Conclusion ROAR is a useful screening tool for children to take before attending a DBP clinic to identify children at high risk for reading difficulties. Assessment of the tool during a busy clinic was challenging and a larger replication is warranted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
During the past 12 months none of the authors, their spouses or partners had a personal, commercial, political, academic or financial interest or relationship that might potentially bias and/or impact content of the research presented here.
Jason Yeatman, PHD hs received funding through the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Neuroscience: Translate, NIH NICHD R01HD095861
Dr. Elizabeth Barrington is an Elizabeth and Russell Siegelman Postdoctoral Fellow of the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute. She is also a trainee supported through Health Resources and Services Administration T77 MC09796
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Stanford University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: During the past 12 months none of the authors, their spouses or partners had a personal, commercial, political, academic or financial interest or relationship that might potentially bias and/or impact content of the research presented here.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
