Higher Family Income and Clinical Dental Outcomes of Minority Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

Study Design and Setting

The present study was designed as an analytical, observational, cross-sectional model, which examined secondary data from the 2017 NSCH. The collected data related to the physical and mental health of American children from birth to 17 years old in the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. The study analyzed weighted, nationally representative data utilizing the U.S. Census Bureau racial/ethnic group classifications of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White, Black, Asian, and Multi-race.¹⁷

Study Size, Participants, and Data Sources

A total of 59,135 sample households in the 50 states plus the District of Columbia were initially screened to find eligible children based on age. From all the inclusion-eligible children, the caregivers of 21,599 children completed the topical questionnaire about their children’s physical and mental health with language availability in English and Spanish.¹⁷ Details of the NSCH subject recruitment process and inclusion criteria were accessed from the NSCH Codebooks.¹⁷

Variables and Data Measurement

The current study’s outcomes of interest were defined as dichotomous variables indicating an answer of “yes” or “no” to the questions: 1) parental-reported dental caries (DC) measured with a “yes” response to the question, ‘Does this child have cavities or tooth decay?; and”, 2) parental-reported multiple oral health problems (MOHP) measured with a ‘yes’ response to the question, ‘Does this child have one or more oral health problems?’ (i.e., toothaches, bleeding gums, decayed teeth, or cavities)”.

Additional variables extracted from the NSCH data set included the following parameters: 1) child age as a continuous variable, 2) child sex as a binary variable of Male or Female, 3) child race and ethnicity defined by non-migrant Hispanic (Hispanic), non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), non-Hispanic Asian (Asian), and non-Hispanic Multi-race/ethnicity (Multi-race) families, 4) parental education defined by “Less than high school,” “High school degree or General Education Diploma (GED),” “Some college or technical school,” and “College degree or higher” as an ordinal variable, and 5) income-to-needs ratio, a proxy for SES based on ordinal variables calculated as a continuous variable of the “family poverty ratio” from the NSCH data. The family poverty ratio was calculated as a percentage of the ratio of total family income and the family poverty threshold, based upon family size. Note that income-to-”needs” ratio does not imply “dental needs” and instead reflects adequacy of family income compared to family size.

Statistical Methods and Quantitative Variables

For descriptive statistics, continuous variables were reported with mean and standard deviations and categorical variables were summarized with frequencies and percentages. The descriptive statistics were reported overall in the pooled data. The distributions of variables were compared across different race/ethnicity groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. The missing data were excluded in the analysis given their low frequency and the observed data with sampling weights.

The logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the effects of race/ethnicity on each outcome, with adjustments for child sex, parental education, child age, and income-to-needs ratio. For each outcome, this study considered two logistic models: Model 1) only outcomes and Model 2) outcomes with the interaction between race/ethnicity and income-to-needs ratio. To investigate the effects of each variable on outcomes within the race/ethnicity group, the analysis additionally conducted the logistic regression analysis, stratified by race/ethnicity.

All statistical tests were two-sided, with Wald type confidence intervals provided, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed in R version 4.0.3 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).¹⁸ Note that the NSCH data set utilized sampling weights for data analysis in the study to attain population-based estimates. To account for the NSCH weights, ‘survey’ R package was used for the analyses.

Ethics

The NYU Grossman School of Medicine Institutional Review Board reviewed and determined this study (Protocol number 20-01537) did not qualify as human-subjects research.

Findings and Hypothesis

The results of the current study, using 2017 NSCH data, failed to reject the null hypothesis and there is insufficient evidence to indicate a statistically significant difference between the racial/ethnic groups, with increased SES, and their clinical outcomes for dental caries and multiple oral health problems. This finding demonstrates that either 1) MDR theory is not applicable in the health outcomes of dental caries and multiple oral health problems for minority children, when comparing higher SES parity between White and minority populations or 2) the biological pathology of dental caries and multiple oral health problems have greater effect compared to the health gains from increased SES.

This present study’s findings showed no disparities between White and minority children for parental-reported DC and MOHP, even when all children gain higher SES.

Comparison to Literature

The literature demonstrates strong support for MDR theory with evidence from a large number of studies focused on clinical conditions such as attention deficit hyperactive disorder, asthma, nutrition, smoking, drinking, obesity, impulse control, depression, anxiety, mental well-being, self-rated health, health care access, chronic diseases, mortality, and children’s dental access to and utilization of dental care.^16,19 A New York Times published article, “Childbirth Is Deadlier for Black Families Even When They’re Rich, Expansive Study Finds,” which was based upon a study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The study found in the United States, the richest mothers and their newborns were the most likely to survive the year after childbirth, except when the family is Black. This groundbreaking study of two million California births supports MDR theory and showed the richest Black mothers and their babies were twice as likely to die as the richest White mothers and their babies.²⁰

Hence, the finding that there is no difference in clinical outcomes between levels of family income is more likely because biologic effects causing dental caries may outweigh the protective factors of higher family income/SES. As described at a 2009 symposium sponsored by the American Dental Association, early childhood caries should be described as a “different” disease and instead be identified as a “pediatric infectious disease with dental manifestations, rather than simply a dental disease” due to the role of cariogenic bacteria, especially Streptococcus mutans (S. Mutans).²¹

Although there are many studies which associate higher caries prevalence with lower SES, ^22-28 they do not specifically address the expected gain in health benefit from higher SES level from MDR theory. Hence, the findings from these studies imply that SES and education levels do not influence the rate of dental caries in children as much as other factors such as dietary habits and oral environment, such as the amount of S. mutans and biofilm, when trying to determine the relationship between caries prevalence and SES in a pediatric population.²⁹

A body of epidemiologic studies supports biologic factors superseding MDR effects. Numerous epidemiologic studies provide evidence for the opposite effect with the association of higher SES levels with higher caries experience. One study by Psoter showed that family income levels were positively associated with any and maxillary incisor caries experience in pre-school children.³⁰ Goodarzi reported that living in higher income households contributed as one of the factors contributing to higher DMFT scores in 12-year-old students in Tehran, Iran.³¹ Another study evaluating DMFT scores of children in Rome, Italy also highlights a positive relationship between DMFT scores and SES.³² More critically, a 2019 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed, from 1999-2004 and 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data cycles, the difference in primary/PERMANENT decayed and filled teeth (dft/DFT) between families with Federal Poverty Level (FPL) less than 100% and 100%-199%, regardless of race/ethnicity, was 1) zero percent for children aged two to eight years old; 2) an increase of five percent for children aged six to eleven years old; and 3) a small decrease of two percent for adolescents aged 12 to 19 years old.^25-28 These data demonstrate that with increased family income, total lifetime tooth decay experience changed very little, if at all.

Clinical studies have also demonstrated strong evidence that biologic factors may influence the insidious nature of the dental caries process in all children. A 2019 study concluded that dental caries severity in the primary dentition was potentially related to individual genotypes and the level of oral S. mutans infectivity.³³ In 2017 another study showed some children with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) possessed a significantly different plaque microbiome comparted to caries-free children, with the S-ECC children experiencing higher levels of S. mutans.³⁴ An interesting study demonstrated that the exponential expansion of S. mutans population of the oral cavity began approximately 10,000 years ago and coincided with the onset of human agriculture. This colonization pattern was associated with metabolic processes which contributed to the successful adaptation of S. mutans to its new niche, the human mouth, and with the dietary adaptations that coincided with the origin of agriculture.³⁵ Hence, it may that humans are wedded to S. mutans and the resultant biologic effect of dental caries due to our dietary dependency on agriculture.

In sum, these epidemiological and clinical reports provide strong evidence that biologic factors influence the insidious nature of the dental caries process in all children and supersedes the effect of health gains from higher SES.

Strengths and Limitations

A strength of this study is it is the first to apply MDR theory between multiple racial/ethnic groups for the outcomes of parental-reported DC and MOHP. In addition, the results of this study are generalizable with its large and diverse sample, high level of statistical power, and U.S. government data source which was nationally representative for children’s health.

However, the interpretation of this study must be carefully considered with appropriate limitations. This research study does not determine the cause-and-effect relationship between any variables used throughout the process of research. As well, the majority responders of the NSCH program were parents, and their interpretations of their children’s health might not be fully accurate. Since the entire data were extracted from a questionnaire-based survey, the question structures and word choices might affect the judgment of the responders which might also depend upon their family cultures and social experiences. Finally, the data were collected in 2017 and thus should be used with caution when applying the findings to current economic and health outcome conditions.

Significance and Implications

It is important that dentists and policymakers realize that dental caries is an intractable disease that supersedes increased SES, and that clinical practice and government policies need to be made in the field of oral health education and prevention of caries to decrease the rate of childhood dental caries and oral health problems. Studies show that there is efficacy with implementing community fluoridated drinking water with a range of 30-60 percent less caries in fluoridated communities.³⁶ Other studies show that the caries disease process becomes more prevalent when the oral environment’s pH decreases or when S mutans levels increase in the biofilm; caries prevalence may decrease with the addition of practices of increasing pH levels and decreasing biofilm and S. mutans levels practices (such as by rinsing the mouth with baking soda or chewing xylitol gum after eating) to one’s daily oral hygiene maintenance.²⁸ Future policies regarding pediatric oral health care should address the above-noted factors contributing to increased rates of dental caries and oral health problems through increasing oral health literacy for both parents and their kids, emphasizing the importance of and offering incentives for regular, periodic dental visits for maintenance of oral health. More nutritional counseling and proper oral hygiene care education should be provided by dental practitioners. More policies should be enacted that contribute to prevention of dental caries such as subsidizing the cost of promoting the use of xylitol as a sweetener and providing fluoridated water in every community. More mandatory continuing education courses on the topic of caries prevention and oral hygiene education can be provided to dentists to remind and teach their patients at every visit. Oral health clinicians should also be aware that although MDR theory was not directly applicable to pediatric caries rates, minority groups of children still endure oral disparities through systemic and structural racism prevalent in society and solving those issues will help with increase in access and utilization of dental care to be able to then treat caries in the pediatric population.

Future Studies

To strengthen the evidence for MDR theory, future studies might be designed with prospective and longitudinal constructs which generate predictive statistical analyses. This study’s findings, generated by the 2017 NSCH data, indicated MDR theory cannot be applied to childhood caries rates. Hence, future studies might also explore more recent NSCH data sets to learn what types of policies enacted may help decrease the rate of childhood caries.