Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulation method for treatment of various neurological disorders. It is often assumed that the primary inhibition or excitation effect of DBS occurs at the site of stimulation. However, recent work has shown that DBS can lead to robust evoked potentials (EP) not only at the stimulation site, representing the local effect, but also in distant brain regions, representing the effects on distant targets. While the significance of these EPs for therapeutic outcomes is not known, it appears that the electrical effects of DBS have a partial modulatory impact on downstream targets. Nonetheless, it remains unclear through what mechanism DBS pulses travel to the distant targets or what portion of the pulses travel along the normal pathways from the stimulation site. The possible scenarios include orthodromic or antidromic pathways, accessory pathways, normally inhibited pathways, and direct electromagnetic activation of distant sites. The ability to record signals from brain regions provides an opportunity to determine the mechanism of DBS signal transmission. We hypothesize that the pathways that transmit DBS pulses include the pathways that transmit intrinsic neural signals. To test this, we performed a transfer function analysis on deep brain recordings during DBS-off condition and compared its impulse response with the transmission of signals from electrical stimulation during DBS-on condition. Our results support our claim that the electrical pulses travel partly along intrinsic neural pathways by showing that the propagation of DBS signals can be partially predicted by observation of intrinsic neural activity and measurement of DBS-EPs.
New & noteworthy This study enhances the understanding of deep brain stimulation (DBS) mechanism by exploring how electrical stimulation travels along neural pathways. We utilized a computational method to explain the main routes through which DBS pulses travel. Our results suggest that DBS signals are likely to be transmitted along the normal pathways. This provides a basis to develop complex and nonlinear models of brain and relate the modulatory effect of stimulation to the brain connectome.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30018276/
Funding Statement
This study is funded by the Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation (PG02518), and CHOC Neurology.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Patients or parents of minor patients provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization for the research use of protected health information and written informed consent for surgical procedures conforming to standard hospital practice, and for research use of electrophysiological data before the procedure. The protocol, procedure and research use of data was approved by the institutional review board (#200330) of Children's Health Orange County (CHOC). The IRBNET ID is 1585019-4 and is funded by CHOC neurology. The title of the study is: intraoperative evoked potential recording for localization of deep brain stimulation electrodes.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version has been revised to provide more detailed literature review and discussion on the results.
4 Created with BioRender.com.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
