Abstract
Background Widespread misinformation in Web resources can lead to serious implications for individuals seeking health advice. Despite that, information retrieval models are often focused only on the query-document relevance dimension to rank results.
Objective We investigate a multi-dimensional information quality retrieval model based on deep learning to enhance the effectiveness of online healthcare information search results.
Methods In this study, we simulated online health information search scenarios with a topic set of 32 different health-related inquiries and a corpus containing one billion Web documents from the April 2019 snapshot of Common Crawl. Using state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we assessed the quality of the retrieved documents according to their usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility dimensions for a given search query on 6,030 human-annotated query-document pairs. We evaluated this approach using transfer learning and more specific domain adaptation techniques.
Results In the transfer learning setting, the usefulness model provided the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatible documents with a difference of +5.6%, leading to a majority of helpful documents in the top-10 retrieved. The supportiveness model achieved the best harm compatibility (+2.4%), while the combination of usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility models achieved the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatibility on helpful topics (+16.9%). In the domain adaptation setting, the linear combination of different models showed robust performance with help-harm compatibility above +4.4% for all dimensions and going as high as +6.8%.
Conclusions These results suggest that integrating automatic ranking models created for specific information quality dimensions can increase the effectiveness of health-related information retrieval. Thus, our approach could be used to enhance searches made by individuals seeking online health information.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Innosuisse project funding numbers 55441.1 IP-ICT and 101.466 IP-ICT.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email(s): boya.zhang{at}unige.ch (B. Zhang); nona.naderi{at}universite-paris-saclay.fr (N. Naderi); rahul.mishra{at}unige.ch (R. Mishra); douglas.teodoro{at}unige.ch (D. Teodoro)
All sections updated to improve the quality of the paper; author affliations updated;
Data Availability
The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during this study are available in the TREC Health Misinformation Track repository [75] and GitLab repository [67].
Abbreviations
- BERT
- Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
- BM25
- Okapi Best Match 25
- CSS
- cascading style sheets
- CLEF
- Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum
- C4
- Colossal, Cleaned Crawl Corpus
- NIST
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- NLP
- natural language processing
- RBO
- Rank Biased Overlap
- SMOG
- Simple Measure of Gobbledygook
- TREC
- Text REtrieval Conference