Abstract
Introduction The review described in this protocol will be the first critical realist review of the literature reporting on the impact of mindfulness interventions in schools on the mental wellbeing of pupils. Mindfulness interventions are increasingly being introduced into schools to promote children’s (and teachers’) wellbeing. Findings from impact evaluations, including systematic reviews and metanalysis, suggest that school-based mindfulness interventions promote pupils’ wellbeing. However, there is a need for further evidence on how they work and for whom and under what circumstances.
Methods and analysis A critical realist review methodology will be used to provide a causal interdisciplinary understanding of how mindfulness interventions in schools promote the mental wellbeing of pupils. This will be done through a systematic literature review and extrapolating context, agency, intervention, mechanisms, and outcome configurations. This will enable us to understand how in certain contexts, pupils can use the resources offered by a mindfulness intervention to trigger mechanisms that promote their mental wellbeing and what mechanisms in the context support, restrict or prevent change. We will then use retrodiction and retroduction to develop the most plausible interdisciplinary middle-range theory to explain the findings.
Discussion The review findings will inform a critical realist evaluation of a mindfulness intervention in schools that we will be carrying out. The findings from the review will enable us to inform policymakers and other stakeholders about what conditions need to be in place for mindfulness interventions to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing and for which pupils. We will publish the findings from the review in academic and professional publications, policy briefs, workshops, conferences, and social media.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42023410484
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
PA, GN, LD The research is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB) (NIHR 133712) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Aberdeen Addis Ababa University University of Rwanda
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.
