ABSTRACT
Background Evidence on the effectiveness of kangaroo mother care (KMC) is available and guidelines have been formulated. However, little is known about the programmatic implementation of KMC at national and subnational levels.
Methods A structured search of grey literature was conducted to identify reports of national or subnational level implementation of KMC to understand the population-based coverage of KMC, availability of KMC services at national and subnational levels, programmatic approaches to scale, and health systems actions that may influence KMC scale-up. The search strategy included two rounds of screening using a variety of grey literature search engines, portals, repositories, and targeted websites, as well as snowball sampling. Data from 212 documents were extracted and transferred into a database with an extensive topic list. These documents were then classified as “for in-depth analysis”, “possible nuggets”, and “not important”. Further analysis of 42 information-rich documents was conducted with NVivo software to identify recurring themes.
Findings We found information on KMC implementation on a national or subnational scale for 18 countries. Estimates for national- or subnational-level population-based coverage of KMC were available from only six countries (Colombia 63%, the Philippines 53%, Malawi 22%, Bangladesh 22%, India 13%, Viet Nam 8%). Information on the availability of KMC services was scant and fragmented, with no information on their quality. Programmatic KMC implementation is characterised by leadership from a variety of implementation partners and by different implementation trajectories. Countries for which information on KMC implementation was available shared common health system actions such as the inclusion of KMC in national policy, recognition of KMC as a priority newborn health intervention and strong advocacy by champions at all levels, dedicated investment in KMC and in some cases insurance cover for KMC, capacity building and motivation among health workers, dedicated space for KMC with equipment and supplies, support for KMC practice, and data collection and use.
Conclusion Programmatic implementation of KMC requires action in multiple health system building blocks with a focus on monitoring and evaluation of availability and quality of services, along with coverage.
Competing Interest Statement
SG is a staff member of the World Health Organization and SR a consultant. AM-B declares no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The review work was supported by a small grant to the University of Pretoria, South Africa, by the World Health Organization.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the World Health Organization or the University of Pretoria.
Funding: The review work was supported by a small grant to the University of Pretoria, South Africa, by the World Health Organization.
Authorship contributions: A-MB and SR conceptualised the review; A-MB conducted the review; SG provided intellectual support throughout the review; A-MB drafted the first manuscript and SG and SR reviewed and modified the draft in an iterative process until all authors had approved the final manuscript submitted for publication.
Competing interests: SG is a staff member of the World Health Organization and SR a consultant. AM-B declares no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval. Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials. Materials are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Additional material: Six online supplementary files.
Data Availability
Materials are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.