Abstract
Importance Pregnant women are at increased risk of severe COVID-19, but the contribution of viral RNA load, the presence of infectious virus, and mucosal antibody responses remain understudied.
Objective To evaluate the association of COVID-19 outcomes following confirmed infection with vaccination status, mucosal antibody responses, infectious virus recovery and viral RNA levels in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women.
Design A retrospective observational cohort study of remnant clinical specimens from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients between October 2020-May 2022.
Setting Five acute care hospitals within the Johns Hopkins Health System (JHHS) in the Baltimore, MD-Washington, DC area.
Participants Participants included confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women and matched non-pregnant women (matching criteria included age, race/ethnicity, and vaccination status).
Exposure SARS-CoV-2 infection, with documentation of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.
Main Outcome(s) The primary dependent measures were clinical COVID-19 outcomes, infectious virus recovery, viral RNA levels, and mucosal anti-spike (S) IgG titers from upper respiratory tract samples. Clinical outcomes were compared using odds ratios (OR), and measures of virus and antibody were compared using either Fisher’s exact test, two-way ANOVA, or regression analyses. Results were stratified according to pregnancy, vaccination status, maternal age, trimester of pregnancy, and infecting SARS-CoV-2 variant.
Results(s) A total of 452 individuals (117 pregnant and 335 non-pregnant) were included in the study, with both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals represented. Pregnant women were at increased risk of hospitalization (OR = 4.2; CI = 2.0-8.6), ICU admittance, (OR = 4.5; CI = 1.2-14.2), and of being placed on supplemental oxygen therapy (OR = 3.1; CI =1.3-6.9). An age-associated decrease in anti-S IgG titer and corresponding increase in viral RNA levels (P< 0.001) was observed in vaccinated pregnant, but not non-pregnant, women. Individuals in their 3rd trimester had higher anti-S IgG titers and lower viral RNA levels (P< 0.05) than those in their 1st or 2nd trimesters. Pregnant individuals experiencing breakthrough infections due to the omicron variant had reduced anti-S IgG compared to non-pregnant women (P< 0.05).
Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, vaccination status, maternal age, trimester of pregnancy, and infecting SARS-CoV-2 variant were each identified as drivers of differences in mucosal anti-S IgG responses in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. Observed increased severity of COVID-19 and reduced mucosal antibody responses particularly among pregnant participants infected with the Omicron variant suggest that maintaining high levels of SARS-CoV-2 immunity may be important for protection of this at-risk population.
Question Is greater COVID-19 disease severity during pregnancy associated with either reduced mucosal antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 or increased viral RNA levels?
Finding In a retrospective cohort of pregnant and non-pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we observed that (1) disease severity, including ICU admission, was greater among pregnant than non-pregnant women; (2) vaccination was associated with reduced recovery of infectious virus in non-pregnant women but not in pregnant women; (3) increased nasopharyngeal viral RNA levels were associated with reduced mucosal IgG antibody responses in pregnant women; and (4) greater maternal age was associated with reduced mucosal IgG responses and increased viral RNA levels, especially among women infected with the Omicron variant.
Meaning The findings of this study provide novel evidence that, during pregnancy, lower mucosal antibody responses are associated with reduced control of SARS-CoV-2, including variants of concern, and greater disease severity, especially with increasing maternal age. Reduced mucosal antibody responses among vaccinated pregnant women highlight the need for bivalent booster doses during pregnancy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was supported by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award [Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation grant to Johns Hopkins University, U01FD005942, awarded to SLK] funded by the Office of Women's Health/FDA/HHS, with additional support provided by NIH/NCI U54CA260492 (SLK and ALC); NIH/NIAID N7593021C00045 (AP); 75D30121C11061 (HHM); U01CK000589 (EYK). The contents are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views, nor an endorsement, by the Office of Women's Health/FDA/HHS, or the U.S. Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Johns Hopkins University gave ethical approval for this work. (Study conducted under IRB protocols IRB00221396, IRB00288258, and IRB00289116)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* co-senior authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
