Analyzing the amplification of Auditory sensation in visually impaired individuals and comparison with normal individuals

Introduction

It is a proven age-old belief that out of all our senses, i.e. vision, touch, smell, taste and hearing, vision is the one most used by humans. (1) It almost overrides the other senses and has been the greatest tool in our survival and the path of evolution.

Loss of one of the basic senses results in a lot of difficulties for the person, but the toughest loss is that of vision (2) There is a high prevalence of blindness in the country, especially in children. (3) Many programs like Vision 2020 have been implemented by the WHO to reduce the burden of blindness in the world. (4)

It is commonly believed that if a person loses one of their basic senses like sight or hearing, other senses will be amplified to compensate the loss and restore as much functionality as possible. This fact is well documented and known to almost everyone, and yet, there is no proper documentation on how much do the other senses amplify when one sense is lost. (5) (6) (7)Many papers and individuals attribute this to an entity in neurology called “Cortical Plasticity” (8), which means that when one part of the brain responsible for a particular sense becomes less functional due to loss of that particular sense, it will convert itself to a new sense, thereby giving that new sense more neurons as compared to other individuals. This amplifies the sense. But, it is also believed that Cortical Plasticity of any neuron to convert and work for something else is only true for neurons in its vicinity. (9) (10)

This phenomenon of amplification is well documented for blindness i.e. loss of vision, that auditory senses amplify to a great extent so that functionality can be somewhat restored (11), but there are few documentations or studies which actually demonstrate HOW MUCH the amplification is and if the amplification is present, does it correlate to the amount of loss of vision present in the individual, or to the amount of time the individual has been visually impaired or both. (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)

It is important to understand the degree of amplification present to understand how much functionality is regained or to help the individual better. (17)It is also important to understand the amount of amplification, since based on the given hypothesis, Cortical Plasticity, the centers of hearing and vision must be close to each other, whereas in reality, the Center of Vision is in the occipital lobe (18)and the Center of Hearing is in the Temporal Lobe (19), which are not close by, but still amplification is observed.

Here, a new methodology is being used, to quantify sensitivity of auditory sense so that it can be compared with normal individual.

Methodology

A Cross Sectional Case-control Experimental Study was carried using a method which has been developed by the authors, where a pure tone sound at a specific intensity was brought inwards towards the subject from multiple directions and the distance was measured where the participant could hear the sound and was noted. The same experiment was carried out in Normal Individuals with normal 6/6 vision and these measurements were compared.

Results

Discussion

Total of 60 individuals were taken for this prototype study in which 15 were control group with 6/6 vision and the rest 45 were Visually impaired individuals with variable degree of blindness depicted in the certificate of disability awarded to them as seen in Table 1.

Table 2 gives a broad sense of the results. Averages in different groups with various amount of blindness can be appreciated. It can be also be noted that Totally Blind individuals have the highest amount of average distance from where they can appreciate the sound source, showing their high acuity for auditory stimulus. And compared to a normal individual, it seems to be higher in every direction. The results are similar to what has been documented before (15) (14) (17) (16)

It becomes pretty evident with the help of Figure 1 that almost in every direction as seen in Table 2, totally blind individuals can appreciate the sound at the highest average distance and is proof enough to state that they have a higher auditory acuity and sensitivity for sound impulses. Following the totally blind individuals, are individuals with high degree of blindness. It can be also seen that one eye blind and low degree blind individuals are almost similar yet higher than normal individuals with 6/6 vision. Table 3 also shows a positive correlation (r=0.28) between the time spent with the disability and the amount of amplification in sharpness which provides further proof that auditory acuity and the sensitivity to identify and appreciate a sound source is amplified and increased in visually impaired individuals in comparison with normal individuals and out of many factors that might be responsible for it, the amount of time spent with the disability is of maximum significance. (17)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:-

Average Distance to hear the sound for individuals from different groups in different directions

With the help of figure 2, it becomes clearer that the average distance for normal individuals is lower in all directions in compared to all and any type of blindness and a pattern emerges. Figure 1 and figure 2 with the help of table 2 shows pretty clearly that the highest amount of distance to appreciate the sound in any individual is when the nose is at 0°, meaning that surface if helix and antihelix of pinna of both ears is pointing towards the direction of sound source, which is followed by 45° and 315° where the wars are facing the direction of the sound but are not perfectly aligned. Then comes direction of nose at 90° in respect to the sound source meaning that the external auditory canal was directly in line with the sound source followed by 270° when External auditory canal of left ear was in line with the sound source direction. In the end comes nose direction of 135° and 215° where the back part of pinna is facing the direction of sound but the lines are aligned followed by 180° where the imaginary line of direction of incoming sound source will hit the occiput of the subject first.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:-

Normal vs Any and all types of blind individuals

Figure 3 is sufficient to demonstrate distance when the sound is appreciated in all and any type of blindness is higher than normal individuals and the sensitivity according to different directions is pretty evident here. A 10% increase can be denoted from Normal individuals in categories of one eye visually impaired and low degree of visual impairment. A 20% increase can be seen in individuals with total visual impairment.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:-

Normal vs Any and all types of blind individuals

It is logical to think that totally blind individuals will have higher amount of sensitivity and hence the distance when they appreciate the demo sound would be higher which should be followed by high degree of blindness. Figure 4 demonstrates that and it also shows that the distance in low degree of blindness and one eye blindness is almost similar and very near to high degree of blindness but it nowhere near to the results of totally blind. It could be that to heighten one sense drastically, complete isolation or loss of one sense might be necessary.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4:-

Distance for individuals with different types of blindness

Conclusion

This results are enough to suffice that in visually impaired individuals a quantifiable difference in amplification in their sensitivity for a sound source and auditory acuity is present which is higher than the sensitivity any normal individual possesses and that sound identification and discrimination is better. Although statistically insignificant, the results are clinically significant and a visible difference is present.

This methodology can be refined and with proper resources, proper funding, and a larger sample size, a more accurate estimation of this amplification can be done.