Abstract
Background Sexual orientation has been measured in a wide variety of ways which reflect both theoretical and practical considerations. However, choice of sexual orientation measure and recoding strategy can impact analytic sample, as well as demographic and health profiles, in analyses of sexual minority populations. We aimed to examine how choice of sexual orientation dimension and recoding decisions impact estimates in the sexual minority population in two population-based studies in the UK.
Methods We used data collected at age 17 (2018) in the UK Millennium Cohort Study and at wave six (2012-13) and eight (2017-18) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the impact of choice of sexual orientation dimension (i.e. identity, attraction and experience) and recoding decisions on achieved analytic sample and composition by selected demographic and health measures within and between datasets.
Results Dimension choice and recoding decisions resulted in variation in analytic sample. For example, more respondents reported some same-sex sexual attraction than reported a non-heterosexual identity (adolescents: 20.77% vs 8.97%, older adults: 4.77% vs 1.04%). Demographic distributions varied, but not substantially by dimension choice or recoding strategy. Overall, in both datasets sexual minority respondents were more likely to be White and in the highest quintiles for income and education than heterosexual respondents. Health status did not vary substantially by dimension choice or recoding strategy, however sexual minority respondents reported worse health than their heterosexual peers.
Conclusions This study explores a range of practical and theoretical considerations when analysing sexual minority respondents using survey data. We highlight the impact recoding decisions may have on the numbers of sexual minority respondents identified within a dataset and demographic and health distributions in this understudied population. We also demonstrate the benefits of including multiple dimensions for capturing mechanisms of interest in elucidating ambiguous responses and exploring sexual diversity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ET is funded by the ESRC-BBSRC Soc-B Centre for Doctoral Training (ES/P000347/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
ELSA data collection was approved by the London Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC/01/2/91), and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethics approval for the MCS study was obtained from the National Research Ethics Service Committee London Central (reference 13/LO/1786). All parents gave consent for their children to participate, and young people also provided verbal consent. Ethics approval for this analysis was received from the Institute of Education, UCL.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Overall content unchanged however structure and detail updated to improve clarity and readability. Figures also updated for clarity and readability.
Data Availability
MCS and ELSA data are available to all researchers, free of cost from the UK Data Service (https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk).
