Abstract
The myoelectric manifestation of fatigue (MMF) is predominantly assessed using median frequency and amplitude of electromyographic (EMG) signals. However, EMG has complex features so that fractals, correlation, entropy, and chaos MMF indicators were introduced to detect alteration of EMG features caused by muscle fatigue that may not be detected by linear indicators. The aim of this study was to determine the best MMF indicators. Twenty-four participants were equipped with EMG sensors on 9 shoulder muscles and performed a repetitive pointing task. They reported their rate of perceived exertion every 30 seconds and were stopped when they reached 8 or higher on the CR10 Borg scale. Partial least square regression was used to predict perceived exertion through 15 MMF indicators. In addition, the proportion of participants with a significant change between task initiation and termination was determined for each MMF indicator and muscle. The PLSR model explained 73% of the perceived exertion variance. Median frequency, mobility, spectral entropy, fuzzy entropy, and Higuchi fractal dimension had the greatest importance to predict perceived exertion and changed for 83.5% participants on average between task initiation and termination for the anterior and medial deltoids. The amplitude, activity, approximate, sample, and multiscale entropy, degree of multifractality, percent determinism and recurrent, correlation dimension, and largest Lyapunov exponent analysis MMF indicators were not efficient to assess MMF. Mobility, spectral entropy, fuzzy entropy, and Higuchi fractal dimension should be further considered to assess muscle fatigue and their combination with median frequency may further improve the assessment of muscle fatigue.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauve en sante securite au travail
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The experimental protocol was approved by the Université de Montréal’s Ethics Committee (#CERC-19-086-D).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
