Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes during the global pandemic Covid-19 in indonesian tertiary referral hospital

Introduction

At the end of 2019, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected Wuhan, China, and spread to several countries worldwide. Furthermore, World Health Organization (WHO) declared a COVID-19 pandemic in March, 2020 (1). This virus first entered Indonesia on March 2, 2020, after two positive cases were discovered. On April 9, 2020, COVID-19 cases began to spread in 34 provinces in Indonesia, including East Java (2). Hospitals in East Java are experiencing problems with health services because they are constrained by the lack of infrastructure, the availability of isolation rooms, and personal protective equipment (PPE) (3). As one of the referral hospitals in East Java experienced a density of patients during the COVID-19 explosion. Because of the large number of health workers who have contracted the COVID-19 virus, the number of health workers available to provide services is very limited, causing services to run inefficiently (4). The referral system in Indonesia so far also cannot run during the COVID-19 pandemic. Coordination between facilities and efforts to prevent primary health care is not running optimally (5).More research is needed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on mothers and babies. According to a retrospective review from Wuhan, China, pregnant women’s clinical characteristics are the same as those of non-pregnant women. Intrauterine transmission has also not been demonstrated (6). According to a UK study, COVID-19 has no significant negative impact to pregnant women, and the need for respiratory support is minimal (7). COVID-19 does not worsen the women’s condition and is not proven to cause transmission to the baby (8). Several researchers in Indonesia are taking an interest in this case. Previously, research at a secondary referral hospital in Surabaya, East Java, found that clinical manifestations and laboratory test results were similar in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. However, this study demonstrates that the risk of death in COVID-19 patients is high (5). Another study conducted at a hospital in Surakarta, Central Java, found that pregnant women infected with COVID-19 did not exhibit severe signs and symptoms (9).

This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of intervention and pregnancy outcomes in obstetric (maternal) patients in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in one of Indonesian tertiary referral hospital.

Methods

Results

The study included 694 pregnant, labour and postpartum women in total (154 mothers with COVID-19 and 540 mothers without COVID-19).

Discussion

The tiered referral system for maternal health services cannot run optimally during pandemic COVID-19. As a tertiary hospital, this hospital should be a patient referral centre in East Java. However, this was not seen in pregnant, maternity and postpartum patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients from Surabaya and Sidoarjo dominate the treatment facilities at this hospital. In fact, 70.1% of COVID-19 patients came from Surabaya. Emergency installation referral became the dominant hospital admission procedure in both groups. The characteristics of the hospital admission procedure in the two groups were significantly different. One of the studies stated that most patients came to the obstetric emergency room for delivery purposes, so it will be challenging to find patients who have COVID-19 symptoms (11). COVID-19 patients without referral/inpatient are higher than non-COVID-19 patients. This condition can be an illustration that the referral system that Indonesia has implemented is not working well (12). The referral system during the COVID-19 pandemic is still showing a weak point. In reality, 76% of village health posts and 41% of home visits were closed. Primary health services cannot run optimally during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as family planning, immunization, and other routine maternal and child healthcare services. Impaired mobility due to travel restrictions is one of the factors for this. In addition to the fear of officers against transmission, primary and secondary health services do not run optimally (5,12).

More than half of COVID-19 patients (53.9%) gave birth by caesarean delivery method. Previous research also stated that there was no significant difference in the mode of delivery in -19 patients who had symptoms or not (11). Other referral hospitals also showed the same trend, that caesarean delivery dominated in COVID-19 patients (3). At the beginning of the pandemic, several referral hospitals in Indonesia did recommend caesarean delivery for COVID-19 patients, aiming to reduce the risk of transmission to health workers early in the pandemic (3,11). Some hypotheses suggest that the increase in caesarean delivery is due to regulatory changes to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic (13). The National Obstetrics Gynaecology Association (POGI) recommends caesarean deliveries to COVID-19 patients (14). Vaginal delivery is considered to increase contact between patients and health workers because it requires longer observation, besides vaginal delivery contributes droplets to health workers when entering the 2nd stage of labour (3,15). Indeed, several countries have also made COVID-19 a medical indication for caesarean delivery interventions so that this method of delivery dominates (15). Several meta-analyses and systematic reviews also state that more than half of COVID-19 patients give birth by caesarean method (8,16). Overall, caesarean delivery did dominate during the COVID-19 pandemic, 52.7% of deliveries to mothers were caesarean. When viewed from the study results, caesarean delivery also dominated non-COVID-19 maternity mothers (52.4%). China is a country that has the same trend, caesarean delivery is the dominant medical intervention for women who are in lockdown (17). Although this action is medically justified, the relationship between caesarean delivery and neonatal maternal mortality is only 20% (18). The World Health Organization (WHO) also recommends that the limit of caesarean delivery does not exceed 15-20% (19).

COVID-19 patients tend to have significantly longer LOS when compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Most patients with COVID-19 had LOS for 10-12 days (31.2%), while 36.9% of non-COVID-19 patients had LOS for 0-3 days. In fact, prolonged length of stay occurs if the duration of treatment is three days after birth. So it can be concluded that COVID-19 patients tend to experience a prolonged length of stay compared to non-COVID-19 patients (20). Some countries show different phenomena, LOS during the pandemic decreased compared to before the pandemic, and LOS for COVID-19 patients tended to be short (20,21). However, it should be considered that the clinical degree of a disease can also indicate a prolonged LOS (22). Moreover, if the patient comes to the hospital in an already severe condition. Considering the data states that the entry procedure for COVID-19 patients is dominated by emergencies.

There was no significant difference in the incidence of maternal mortality in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. However, some diagnoses were found to be significantly higher in COVID-19 patients. First, maternal infectious and parasitic diseases classifiable elsewhere but complicating pregnancy (1.3% vs 0.0%), tuberculosis is a specific complication of this diagnosis. Pregnant women who have a history of tuberculosis have a greater risk of suffering from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the output obtained will be more labour intensive when compared to women who do not have this history (23). However, we did not get information on how tuberculosis travels in COVID-19 patients, so we cannot provide an analysis of whether tuberculosis appeared before they were diagnosed with COVID-19 or after. Furthermore, abnormalities of forces of labour in COVID-19 patients are also higher than in non-COVID-19 patients (12.3% vs 9.6%). In the ICD category, these complications are related to labour progress. Some complications such as inadequate contraction, uterine inertia, and hypertonic are categorized in this diagnosis. The high number of complications that affect labour progress can be a medical indication for cesarean delivery. Looking back at the recommendations made by POGI, obstacles in the progress of labour can be an indication for a cesarean delivery so that contact between health workers and patients can be minimized (14). Lastly, the diagnosis of complications of the puerperium, not elsewhere classified (0.6% vs 0.0%) was found only in patients with COVID-19. More specifically, disruption of caesarean section wound is a complication that occurs in this diagnosis. Certainly, this also correlates with the high percentage of cesarean deliveries in COVID-19 patients, so the possibility of complications due to this procedure is also higher.

Conclusion

This study illustrates no significant difference in the percentage of maternal deaths in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. However, several other output indicators show different things. The LOS of COVID-19 patients has been shown to be longer than that of non-COVID-19 patients, and the ARDS complications that can aggravate the mother’s condition are also relatively high. Another thing that needs to be a concern is the high rate of caesarean delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, both for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. Also, the referral process is not running properly, so there is a risk of accumulating patients in the ER because emergency referrals dominate.

The health service system in Indonesia should be prepared for a crisis such as a pandemic. The government must intensify health service innovation, such as remote technology-based services, to improve this. Likewise, health workers, such as midwives, should already have breakthroughs and capabilities related to health service innovation. This, of course, will affect the quality of services provided.