Abstract
Introduction There is no unequivocal opinion concerning the influence of decreased liver attenuation on the COVID-19 severity, but its widespread occurrence among these patients has been shown. There has been no evaluation of the liver status both before and after COVID-19.
Study objective To assess the prognostic value of liver attenuation on CT scan in patients with COVID-19.
Material and methods A retrospective cohort study. Data of COVID-19 outpatients were analyzed. Inclusion criteria: two chest CT scans, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in blood, and polymerase chain reaction results to verify SARS-CoV-2. Subjects were categorized into four comparison groups depending on the severity of lung involvement. Liver attenuation was analyzed by automatic segmentation, where the values less than 40 HU were considered pathological.
Results Data from 499 subjects were included. The groups differed in age and the level of liver attenuation on both CT scans. No correlation between ALT, AST and changes in liver attenuation was found. On follow-up CT, low liver attenuation was observed in males (odds ratio (OR) 2.79 (95% CI 1.42–5.47), p-value = 0.003) and in patients with a baseline reduced liver density (OR 60.59 (95% CI 30.51–120.33), p-value < 0.001). Age over 60 years was associated with the development of lung lesions (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.02–1.06) for extent of lung injury < 25%, OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.05–1.11) for 25–50%, OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.06–1.15) for 25– 50%, p-value < 0.001). Low liver attenuation on the baseline CT scan increased the odds of severe lung injury (OR 6.9 (95% CI 2.06–23.07), p-value = 0.002).
Conclusion In COVID-19, patients with low liver attenuation are more likely to develop severe lung damage.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of an independent ethics committee of the Russian Radiology Society, Moscow branch, gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
