Abstract
In the study of epilepsy, it is of crucial importance to understand the transition from interictal into ictal activities (ictogenesis). Different mechanisms have been suggested for the generation of ictal activity; yet, it remains unclear whether different physiological mechanisms underly different seizure onset patterns. Herein, by implementing a computational model that takes into account some of the most relevant physiological events (e.g., depolarization block, collapse, and recovery of inhibitory activities) and different scenarios of imbalanced excitatory-inhibitory activities, we explored if seizures with different onset patterns stem from different underlying mechanisms. Our model revealed that depending on the excitation level, seizures could be generated due to both enhancement and collapse of inhibition for specific range of parameters. Successfully reproducing some of the commonly observed seizure onset patterns, our findings indicated that different onset patterns can arise from different underlying mechanisms.
Significance Statement Various seizure onset patterns have been reported; however, it yet remains unknown whether seizures with distinct onset patterns originate from different underlying mechanisms. The common belief on seizure generation focuses on the imbalance between synaptic excitation and inhibition which has led to the identification of distinct and, in some cases, even contradictory mechanisms for seizure initiation. In this study, by incorporating some of these various physiological mechanisms in a unified framework, we reproduced some commonly observed seizure onset patterns. Our results suggest the existence of different mechanisms responsible for the generation of seizures with distinct onset patterns which can enhance our understanding of seizure generation mechanisms with significant implications on developing therapeutic measures in seizure control.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by CIHR project grant (390044); Canada Research Chair Program (DKN).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study only uses a computational modeling framework to simulate seizure onset patterns. In the figures, simulations are presented along with the seizure onset patterns of human iEEG recordings with a protocol the same as our previous publication which was approved by the Centre Hospitalier de Universite de Montreal (CHUM) Ethics Committee): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121121001923?via%3Dihub
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
