Abstract
Background There is increasing interest in the concept of frailty in stroke, including both physical frailty and imaging-evidence of brain frailty. We aimed to 1)establish concurrent validity of a brain frailty measurement against traditional measures of physical and global frailty 2)establish prevalence of brain frailty in stroke survivors with and without pre-existing frailty 3)establish the predictive validity of measures of physical, global, and brain frailty against long-term cognitive outcomes.
Methods We included consecutively admitted stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) survivors from participating stroke centres. Baseline CT scans were used to identify leukoaraiosis, atrophy, or old infarcts; these were then combined to generate an overall brain frailty score for each participant on a scale ranging from 0-3 (3=higher brain frailty). Global frailty was measured using Rockwood frailty index, and physical frailty using a Fried frailty screening tool. Presence of major or minor neurocognitive disorder at 18-months following stroke was established via a multicomponent assessment. We assessed the concurrent validity of brain frailty and frailty scales via Spearman’s rank correlation. Prevalence of brain frailty was established based upon observed percentages within groups defined by frailty status (robust, pre-frail, frail). We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate association between brain, global, and physical frailty with 18-month cognitive impairment.
Results Three-hundred-forty-one stroke survivors participated. Brain frailty was weakly correlated with Rockwood frailty (Rho:0.336;p<0.001) and with Fried frailty (Rho:0.230;p<0.001). Three-quarters of people who were frail had moderate-severe brain frailty and prevalence increased according to frailty status. Brain frailty (OR:1.64,95%CI=1.17-2.32), Rockwood frailty (OR:1.05,95%CI=1.02-1.08) and Fried frailty (OR:1.93,95%CI=1.39-2.67) were each independently predictive of cognitive impairment at 18 months following stroke. Fried frailty was predictive independent of age, sex, stroke severity, education, baseline cognitive test performance, and brain frailty status (OR:1.49,95%CI=1.03-2.18)
Conclusions Physical and brain frailty are separate concepts, although they frequently co-exist. Both are associated with adverse cognitive outcomes and physical frailty remains important when assessing cognitive outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Scottish Neurological Research Fund seedcorn grant, the Stroek Association and The Chief Scientist Office Scotland
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was approved by the Scotland A Research Ethics committee and obtained for all participating sites (REC number:16/SS/0105).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All data is avaialable upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
