Abstract
India formulated an anti-tobacco and anti-smoking law in 2003 in response to its resolutions in the United Nations’ bodies. This law has been detailed subsequently to make it focussed on educational institutions, which are supposed to perform on-ground action. The first is to put up signboards prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and tobacco products within 100 yards, the second is prohibiting smoking within the campus, and the third is implementing the law and collecting fines from the offenders. The focus of this paper is on India’s premier educational institutions called the ‘Institutions of National Importance’ by the Indian legislature. These are India’s public institutions which have a focus of the government in making them high quality. The paper checked for the compliance of the Indian anti-smoking and anti-tobacco laws in 79 of these institutions. The Right to Information Act, 2005, India’s transparency law, was used to file applications for information, and certified information from the institutions was collected and reported. The results show an overall weak compliance with the law. India’s health regulators and educational watchdogs must implement anti-smoking and anti-tobacco laws strictly in Indian educational institutions.
What is already known on this topic
What is already known on this topic There is noncompliance of India’s anti-smoking /anti-tobacco legislation, esp. signboards.
What this study adds
What this study adds This study adds pan India based compliance at higher educational institutions with a study on fine collection and signboard compliance.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
How this study might affect research, practice or policy This study is a wakeup call for Indian educational institutions as India has decentralised implementation of the anti-smoking law to educational institutions and they must perform this duty well.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding was received on this study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: dr.rajasingh{at}proton.me
Data Availability
Data available on reasonable request
