Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I) on new-onset hip fractures.
Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including type-2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with either SGLT2I or DPP4I between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2020 in Hong Kong. The primary outcome was new-onset hip fracture and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) using the nearest neighbour search was performed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were applied to identify significant predictors. Competing risks models and multiple approaches using the propensity score were performed.
Results This cohort included 56393 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (median age: 62.1 years old [interquantile range, IQR]: 54.2-71.1; 57.45% males), of which 20432 patients ([incidence rate, IR]: 36.23%) used SGLT2I and 35961 patients (IR: 63.77%) used DPP4I. After the 1:1 propensity score matching, 449 (IR: 1.09%) patients had hip fractures, and 2012 patients (IR: 4.92%) died. SGLT2I was associated with significantly lower risks of hip fractures after adjusting for the demographics, past comorbidities, non-SGLT2I/DPP4I medications and laboratory results (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.89; P=0.0036). The results were consistent in the competing risk models and the different propensity matching approaches.
Conclusions SGLT2I was associated with lower risks of new-onset hip fractures after propensity score matching and adjustments.
Summary This study compared the risks of hip fractures in between users of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type-2 diabetes mellitus. After propensity score matching, SGLT2I was associated with lower risks of hip fractures adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.89; P=0.0036).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong/New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authors
declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
