Abstract
There is limited evidence around the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent violence against children in low- and middle-income countries. We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 1) a community outreach intervention to link eligible households to anti-poverty cash grants, and 2) a group-based parenting support intervention, and 3) a group-based parenting support ‘plus’ linkage of eligible households to anti-poverty cash grants intervention for preventing adolescent violence victimisation in Mpumalanga province, South Africa.
The target population was families with an adolescent living below the national food poverty line. Modelled violence outcomes were emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. Intervention effectiveness was conditional on interventions’ effect on two evidence-based protective factors for adolescent violence: food security and caregiver supervision. Cost-effectiveness ratios were expressed per DALY averted and evaluated against a South Africa-specific willingness-to-pay threshold. We varied model parameters to consider routine service delivery versus trial-based costing, and population-average versus high prevalence of violence.
For routine service delivery costing, both community grant outreach and parenting support interventions were cost-effective at population-average prevalence (ACER=USD2,650, and ACER=USD2,830 per DALYs averted, respectively), and high prevalence of violence (ACER=USD1,330 and ACER=USD2,305 per DALYs averted, respectively). The incremental cost-effectiveness of adding grant linkage to parenting support was USD271 and USD177 at population-average and high prevalence of violence, respectively. For trial-based costing, none of the interventions were cost-effective at population-average prevalence of violence, and only community grant outreach was cost-effective at high prevalence of violence (ACER=USD2400 per DALY averted). Cost-effectiveness estimates are expected to be conservative based on our only modelling intervention effects on three violence outcomes via two protective factors.
Findings indicate that investments in community grant outreach, and parenting support interventions are likely to be cost-effective for preventing adolescent violence. Adding a grant linkage component to parenting support would enhance this approaches cost-effectiveness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) Accelerate Hub [ES/S008101/1], the Oak Foundation [OFIL-20-057] Wellspring Philanthropic Fund [Grant no. 16204] Oak Foundation/GCRF "Accelerating Violence Prevention in Africa" [R46194/AA001], and the Wellspring Philanthropic Fund [Grant no. 16204]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used secondary data published in the public domain throughout the analysis. Hence, ethical approval was not sought.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.
