Abstract
Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting both ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strips [SS] and microcapillary tubes [MCT]) have significant drawbacks. Here we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs). First, we optimized SCL protein sampling in vitro, then performed in vivo studies in 6 human subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60±31 μg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed the majority of proteins were sampled by all methods. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, SCLs had reduced levels of reflex tear protein zymogen granule protein 16 homolog B (ZG16B) versus SS and MCT. These experiments demonstrate SCLs as an accessible tear sampling method which may minimize reflex tearing and potentially aid biomarker discovery.
Competing Interest Statement
Robert Roden reports equipment, drugs, or supplies was provided by Alpine Vision Center. Robert Roden reports a relationship with Alpine Vision Center that includes: employment.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Brigham Young University College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Brigham Young University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
robkroden{at}gmail.com
natezu93{at}gmail.com
wright.c.josh{at}gmail.com
davidhparkinson{at}gmail.com
leena2411{at}gmail.com
fangfangjiang123{at}gmail.com
burlett.rebecca{at}gmail.com
joshuarogersbyu{at}gmail.com
jarettpittman5{at}gmail.com
connor.roper98{at}gmail.com
kenlvirgin{at}gmail.com
canoowidow{at}yahoo.com
jcprice{at}chem.byu.edu
kenc{at}chem.byu.edu
Data Availability
All data produced are available online on the Mendeley data repository.
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/f4vggkmcdn/draft?a=82975819-b7d7-486a-9db2-76919a7a7cfb