Abstract
Brain-fingerprinting is a neuroimaging approach that is expanding the neuroscientific perspective on inter-individual diversity in health and disease. In the present study, we used brain-fingerprinting to advance the neurophysiological characterization of Parkinson’s disease (PD). We derived the brain-fingerprints of patients with PD and age-matched healthy controls from the rhythmic and arhythmic spectral features of brief and task-free magnetoencephalography recordings. Using this approach, the individual differentiation of patients against healthy controls is 81% accurate, with the differentiability of patients scaling with the severity of their cognitive and motor symptoms. We show that between-patient differentiation is more challenging (77% accurate) than between healthy controls (90%) because the neurophysiological spectral features of patients with PD are less stable over time. The most distinctive features for differentiating healthy controls map to higher-order regions in the brain functional hierarchy. In contrast, the most distinctive features for patient differentiation map to the somatosensori-motor cortex. We also report that patient brain-fingerprints coincide with the cortical topography of the neurotransmitter systems affected in PD. We conclude that Parkinson’s disease affects the spectral brain-fingerprint of patients with remarkable heterogeneity between individuals, and increased variability over short periods of time, compared to age-matched healthy controls. Our study demonstrates the relevance of neurophysiological fingerprinting to clinical neuroscience, and highlights its potential in terms of patient stratification, disease modeling, and the development and evaluation of personalized interventions.
Lay summary Brain fingerprinting is a novel approach that advances the neuroscientific understanding of differences between individuals. Recent work has shown that brief recordings of our brain activity differentiate us from each other, just like the fingerprints of our hand. The present study investigates how brain-fingerprints can help evaluate patients affected by a chronic neurological disorder like Parkinson’s disease and advance the understanding of the physiology of the disease. The authors discovered that the brain regions involved in the sense of touch and motor functions, whose functions are impaired by the disease, are the most prominent for differentiating between patients. In contrast, regions that support abstract thoughts are more typical of the healthy brain fingerprint. They also found that the more severe the motor symptoms, the more distinctive the patient’s brain-fingerprint. However, they also report that in Parkinson’s disease, brain activity tends to be more variable over short periods of times, which makes patients’ brain-fingerprints more elusive to differentiate. Nevertheless, the study shows that the brain-fingerprint of patients is related to the cortical topography of the neurotransmitter systems affected by Parkinson’s disease. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of brain-fingerprinting as a tool to advance clinical neuroscience towards improved understanding and future interventions against neurological disorders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Data collection and sharing for this project was provided by the Quebec Parkinson Network (QPN), the Pre-symptomatic Evaluation of Novel or Experimental Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease (PREVENT-AD; release 6.0) program, and the Open MEG Archives (OMEGA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The QPN is funded by a grant from Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS). PREVENT-AD was launched in 2011 as a $13.5 million, 7-year public-private partnership using funds provided by McGill University, the FRQS, an unrestricted research grant from Pfizer Canada, the Levesque Foundation, the Douglas Hospital Research Centre and Foundation, the Government of Canada, and the Canada Fund for Innovation. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Development Office of the McGill University Faculty of Medicine and by the Douglas Hospital Research Centre Foundation (http://www.douglas.qc.ca/). OMEGA and the Brainstorm app are supported by funding to SB from the NIH (R01-EB026299), a Discovery grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (436355-13), the CIHR Canada research Chair in Neural Dynamics of Brain Systems, the Brain Canada Foundation with support from Health Canada, and the Innovative Ideas program from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund, awarded to McGill University for the HBHL initiative. This work was supported by a grant F32-NS119375 (AIW) from the National Institutes of Health and a doctoral fellowship from NSERC (JDSC, JYH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: The data are available through the Clinical Biospecimen Imaging and Genetic (C-BIG) repository (https://www.mcgill.ca/neuro/open-science/c-big-repository), the PREVENT-AD open resource (https://openpreventad.loris.ca/ and https://registeredpreventad.loris.ca), and the OMEGA repository (https://www.mcgill.ca/bic/resources/omega). Normative neurotransmitter density data are available from neuromaps (https://github.com/netneurolab/neuromaps).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵‡ Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Pre-symptomatic Evaluation of Novel or Experimental Treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease (PREVENT-AD) program (https://douglas.research.mcgill.ca/stop-ad-centre), data release 6.0. A complete listing of PREVENT-AD Research Group can be found in the PREVENT-AD database: https://preventad.loris.ca/acknowledgements/acknowledgements.php?date=[2022-02-01]. The investigators of the PREVENT-AD program contributed to the design and implementation of PREVENT-AD and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos