1 Abstract
Despite the best intentions public health interventions (PHIs) can have adverse and other unintended consequences (AUCs). AUCs are rarely systematically examined when developing, evaluating or implementing PHIs. We used a structured, multi-pronged and evidence-based approach to develop a framework to support researchers and decision-makers in conceptualising and categorising AUCs of PHIs.
We employed the ‘best-fit’ framework synthesis approach. We designed the a-priori framework using elements of the WHO-INTEGRATE framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Next, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of theoretical and conceptual publications on the AUCs of PHIs in the databases Medline and Embase as well as through grey literature searches. Based on these findings, we iteratively revised and advanced the a-priori framework based on thematic analysis of the identified research. To validate and further refine the framework, we coded four systematic reviews on AUCs of distinct PHIs against it.
The CONSEQUENT framework includes two components: the first focuses on AUCs and serves to categorise them; the second component highlights the mechanisms through which AUCs may arise. The first component comprises eight domains of consequences – health, health system, human and fundamental rights, acceptability and adherence, equality and equity, social and institutional, economic and resource, and ecological.
The CONSEQUENT framework is intended to facilitate conceptualisation and categorising of AUCs of PHIs during their development, evaluation and implementation to support evidence-informed decision-making.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung; BMBF) for this project. Grant number (001001EL2032)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Minor Changes in Wording. Primarily regarding the wording anticipating and assessing vs. conceptualization and classification.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript as well as in the public domain.
