Abstract
Introduction The Government of Pakistan initiated the Community Midwifery program in 2006 to provide skilled birth attendance to women living in rural areas. However, the acceptability of midwives and what impact these community midwives have made on overall maternal morbidity and mortality remains an unanswered question. We explored the perceptions of health officials, midwifery students, midwives and community women about the factors that influence the acceptability of community midwives’ services in the rural district Thatta, Pakistan.
Materials and Methods A qualitative exploratory study was conducted in the rural district Thatta of Pakistan. In-depth interviews were conducted with health officials, midwifery students who were currently enrolled in the midwifery program of the district; community midwives providing services in district Thatta, and trained community midwives who are not practicing. Interviews were also conducted with community women. Data were analyzed using the qualitative thematic analysis approach and the deductive analysis method.
Results Two overarching themes were identified: (I) community acceptance and support; and (II) dynamics between CMWs and other health care providers. The major hindering factors to CMWs acceptance included their young age challenging social acceptability, patronizing behavior of doctors, high acceptance of traditional birth attendants working in rural areas, and the community’s reluctance towards referral services. The facilitating factors included clients’ privacy maintained at birth stations and the affordability of community midwives’ services.
Conclusion There are deep-rooted challenges related to the acceptability of midwifery services at the community level and with other competing healthcare providers which need advocacy to support and accept their services at the community level and by other professionals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The paper is from the first author’s thesis work. The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval to conduct the study was given by the Aga Khan University Ethical Review Committee (2020-3391-11138). Participants provided verbal consent to indicate their willingness to participate. Voluntary participation and the right to ask any questions and to decline participation at any time were emphasized during the data collection.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets were collected and analyzed and can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
