Effectiveness of Ferritin-guided Donation Intervals in Blood Donors: Results of the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized FIND’EM Trial

Amber Meulenbeld, Steven Ramondt, Maike G. Sweegers, Franke A. Quee, Femmeke J. Prinsze, Emiel O. Hoogendijk, Dorine W. Swinkels, Katja van den Hurk
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284933

Abstract

Importance Blood donors are at increased risk for iron deficiency. Current hemoglobin (Hb) monitoring policies are inadequate and iron management strategies are warranted.

Objective To determine the effects of ferritin-guided donation intervals for whole blood donors on Hb and ferritin levels, Hb deferral, iron deficiency (ferritin < 15 ng/mL) prevalence, donor return, iron deficiency-related symptoms, and the blood supply.

Design, setting and participants Between November 2017 and November 2019 a ferritin-guided donation interval policy was implemented and evaluated through a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial in all blood collection centers in the Netherlands. During the study period, 412,888 donors visited the blood bank.

Interventions Ferritin was measured in new donors and at every 5th whole blood donation. Subsequent donation intervals were extended to six months if ferritin is 15 ≤ 30 ng/mL and to twelve months if ferritin is <15 ng/mL.

Main outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes are ferritin and Hb levels, iron deficiency, Hb deferral, and donor return. Secondary outcomes are self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms. Yearly donor and donation statistics were used to assess the impact on the blood supply.

Results We measured 36,099 donors, median age 43 years and 52% female, making 37,621 donations during the study period. Ferritin-guided donation intervals were associated with increased log-transformed ferritin levels at all time points in the trial, up to 0.24 log10 ng/mL as compared to baseline (95% CI 0.22 – 0.27, p <0.001). Hb increased as well, up to 0.37 g/dL (95% CI 0.31 – 0.43, p <0.001). Decreased odds of 85% (95% CI OR 0.10 – 0.21, p <0.001) for iron deficiency and 77% (95% CI OR 0.11 – 0.41, p <0.001) for Hb deferral were reported compared to baseline. Odds of donor return decreased over the course of the trial, with as much as 40% (95% CI OR 0. 51 – 0.67, p <0.001). We found no evidence for improved self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms after implementation of the new policy. More invitations had to be sent to donors to obtain one donation and the average donation frequency per year decreased.

Conclusion and Relevance Ferritin-guided donation intervals were significantly associated with increasing overall Hb and ferritin levels, thereby decreasing the prevalence of iron deficiency and Hb deferrals in whole blood donors. Ferritin-guided donation intervals seem beneficial for Hb levels and iron maintenance, but additional efforts are required to retain donors and to remedy self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms.

Trial Registration This trial has been registered in the Dutch trial registry (NTR6738) on September 29th, 2017 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6738).

Question Are ferritin-guided donation intervals effective in diminishing iron deficiency and low hemoglobin in whole blood donors?

Findings In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with 412,888 donors and 1,643,700 donations, ferritin-guided donation intervals were associated with a significant improvement in hemoglobin and ferritin levels and decreased donor return rates. Data did not suggest improved self-reported health outcomes.

Meaning Ferritin-guided donation intervals, in addition to hemoglobin monitoring, as part of the donor iron management strategy of blood establishments effectively reduce the prevalence of iron deficiency and anemia in whole blood donors, but additional efforts to retain donors are required.

Introduction

Annually, more than 100 million whole blood donations are made worldwide to provide life-saving treatment for patients requiring transfusion.1 Whole blood donors that donate repeatedly are at risk of developing iron deficiency and subsequent anemia.2 Male donors lose approximately 8% of their total iron stores with each whole blood donation, whereas menstruating women lose on average 81% of their total iron stores.3–5 Iron stores can be monitored through measuring ferritin. Iron deficiency, ferritin levels <15 ng/ml, presents in approximately 15.0% of female and 9.4% of male Dutch repeat donors.6

There is no consensus on iron management strategies for donor health, but key approaches include extended donation intervals and iron supplementation.7–9 Concerns about negative perceptions, side effects, and low compliance may favor extended donation intervals. 9,10 In previous studies, extended donation intervals were associated with lower risk of Hb deferrals.11,12 The INTERVAL trial showed that longer donation intervals led to significantly higher Hb and ferritin levels.12 Most blood establishments monitor Hb to protect donor health, prevent anemia and ensure sufficient Hb content in the product, deferring blood donors with Hb levels below 13.5 g/dL (males) or 12.5 g/dL (females).7–9,13–15 However, iron deficiency can present without anemia, especially in repeat donors. As Hb levels do not reflect iron stores, the current standard is insufficient to maintain proper iron reserves. The World Health Organization (WHO) advises additional monitoring of ferritin to detect iron deficiency and monitor donor health.16

In 2017, Sanquin Blood Bank in The Netherlands implemented a nationwide policy for iron monitoring of whole blood donors. In addition to the Hb measurement at the pre-donation screening, ferritin is measured at the first visit of new donors and after every fifth whole blood donation of repeat donors. If ferritin is between 15 and 30 or below 15 ng/mL, the subsequent donation interval is extended to six or twelve months, respectively. A stepped-wedge approach was used to evaluate the effects of this ferritin-guided donation interval policy for whole blood donors on (1) Hb and ferritin levels, (2) iron deficiency, (3) Hb deferral, (4) donor return rates, (5) self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms, and (6) the blood supply.

Methods

Design

Ferritin measurement IN Donors—Effectiveness of iron Monitoring (FIND’EM) is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, described in detail by Sweegers et al.17 We conducted cross-sectional ferritin measurements before, during, and after implementing a new policy for all donors visiting a blood collection center during pre-selected weeks. We measured ferritin in stored plasma samples from donors who consented to use their leftover donations for medical research. Additionally, optional questionnaires were offered to donors. The trial was powered on 4ng/mL change in the ferritin level outcome over six months, assuming a SD of 54 ng/mL, ICC of 0.10 and 150 visits per donation center.17 The policy and implementation strategy was approved by Sanquin’s Medical and Ethical Advisory Board. The trial was approved by Sanquin’s Board of Directors.

Randomization

The 138 fixed and mobile blood collection centers in the Netherlands are divided over 29 staffing clusters that we randomly assigned to four randomization groups. The stepped-wedge design involved random and sequential rollout of ferritin-guided donation intervals in all 29 clusters by randomization group from November 2017 to November 2019. The allocation was not concealed and the planned timing of the rollout was revealed before the study. Donors were notified of the new policy through letters upon implementation at their regular donation center.

Procedures

As part of routine procedures, donors undergo a health screening to assess their eligibility to donate by measuring Hb levels and blood pressure and assessing recent travel, sexual and medical history prior to every donation. In the Netherlands, donors also make a pre-donation screening visit prior to their first donation. In accordance with European legislation, Hb cut-offs for donor eligibility are >13.5 g/dL for males and >12.5 g/dL for females.18 Donors with low Hb (capillary measurement prior to donation with HemoCue 201, Angelholm, Sweden) are deferred for 3 months. If eligible, males can donate every 56 days up to five times a year, females every 122 days up to three times a year, independent of menopausal status.

The intervention entails extended donation intervals based on ferritin measurements. The cut-offs for extended intervals were based on definitions for iron deficiency (<15 ng/mL, 12 months deferral) and reduced iron levels (≤30 ng/mL, 6 months deferral) by Alvarez-Ossorio et al.9 The six month interval is based on the results from Schotten et al., suggesting intervals of at least 180 days are required to fully replete iron stores after donation.8 A twelve month interval is indicated for iron deficient donors to replete to higher levels than pre-donation. In whole blood donors, ferritin is measured at the pre-donation screening visit before the first donation and of each fifth whole blood donation. If ferritin levels are >30 ng/mL, donors are eligible to donate at regular donation intervals. If ferritin levels are ≤30 ng/mL but ≥15 ng/mL, repeat donors are deferred for six months; new donors are allowed to donate, but ferritin is measured again at this first donation, after which they follow the repeat donor policy. If ferritin levels are <15 ng/mL, new and repeat donors are deferred from donating for twelve months. Ferritin levels are measured again in the donation after this extended interval. Donor physicians may additionally advise donors to visit their general practitioner and/or donate at a lower frequency.17

Outcome assessment

Before the trial, we established four measurement points: 1) one week before implementation (baseline), 2) midway through implementation, 3) one week after full implementation, and 4) one year after full implementation of ferritin-guided donation intervals. Primary outcomes included Hb and ferritin levels, Hb deferral, iron deficiency, and donor return rates, while secondary outcomes encompassed iron deficiency-related symptoms and the impact on the blood supply. Pseudonymized data on age, sex, Hb levels, and deferrals were extracted from the blood bank database (eProgesa software application; MAK-SYSTEM, Paris, France) for donors who visited a blood collection center during a measurement week and consented to their information and leftover materials being used for research. Donor return was defined as attempting a donation within six months after becoming eligible to donate again, accounting for minimum donation intervals and possible deferrals. We measured ferritin levels on the Architect i2000sr (Abbott Diagnostics) in plasma samples collected at donation in K3EDTA tubes (VACUETTE®, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) and stored at −30⁰C for three to 24 months.19

New and repeat donors in fixed blood collection centers during measurement week 2 and 3 that provided informed consent were asked to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires assess physical and mental wellbeing (SF-36), fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength), donation-related symptoms, restless legs syndrome (RLS) and pica, cognitive functioning (Cognitive Failure Questionnaire), and warm glow.12,17,20–23 Questionnaires were completed using Qualtrics XM® software (Provo, UT, USA) during or shortly after the donation.17

We aimed to assess the impact of the new policy on the blood supply by comparing operational data from the blood bank during and one year before and after the study period. We gathered data on whole blood donations, donors and donations invitations from the blood bank database (eProgesa software application; MAK-SYSTEM, Paris, France). Available donors were defined as not being deferred for medical (iron-related or other), travel or lifestyle factors; new donors as showing up for the pre-donation screening; and lapsed donors when they deregistered or did not respond to 5 subsequent invitations. Demands for each year were based on hospital requests and converted to blood units.

Data analyses

Descriptive statistics are provided for the donors measured during measurement week 1. Using donors measured during all four weeks, we conducted complete case analysis and used ordinary least squares regression in case of continuous outcomes and logistic regression for binary outcomes. After diagnostic tests of linearity and errors assumptions, a log base 10 transformation was applied to improve linearity of ferritin. We conducted robust regression to analyze cognitive functioning, physical health, mental health and fatigue, as the normality assumption for logistic regression was violated. Measurements after implementation were grouped in periods of 6 months and compared to the control condition. The control condition was defined as no implementation of the new policy or implementation less than 6 months ago. Analyses were adjusted for age, weight and height, and stratified by sex and menopausal status. Donor return analyses were adjusted for return being during a COVID-19 lockdown. Null hypotheses are that there are no associations between implementation of the new policy and the outcomes. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant and a Bonferroni correction is applied. Statistical analyses were conducted using the R language and environment for statistical computing (4.1.1) and the lme4 (1.1.33), car (3.1.2), lmtest (0.9.40), sandwich (3.0.2), olsrr (0.5.3), and robustbase (0.95.1) packages.24–30 HTML files of the scripts and results produced in Quarto are available on GitHub through https://github.com/Sanquin/FINDEM.31

Deviations from protocol

As the number of donors with low ferritin was higher than anticipated after implementation in the first group, further implementation was executed in smaller steps to mitigate the impact on the blood supply.17 Additional ferritin measurements were done on samples from all donations one year after the third measurement round (between November 23rd and 27th 2020). This fourth time point enables evaluation of long-term results. We furthermore deviated from the protocol by using ordinary least squares regression instead of linear mixed models. In the linear mixed models for analysis of the primary outcomes with random effects for the donation center clusters, the ICC ranged from 0.00 to 0.05; R2 did not improve with random effects; and residual variance exceeded the variance between clusters. This indicates that the random effects of the donation center clusters were of minimal importance and justifies the use of linear regression models. We conducted sensitivity analyses for donor return, stratifying by ferritin level, reason for deferral, and donation center type. Lastly, we added a sixth element (impact on the blood supply) to the research question and accordingly adjusted the methods.

Results

A total of 412,888 whole blood donors made 1,634,700 donations during the study period. We performed measurements in samples of 37,621 donations by 36,099 donors (Figure 1). Table 1 shows the characteristics of donors by sex and randomization group in measurement week 1, in Table S1 they are compared to measurements from week 4. Overall, across the randomization groups, donor characteristics were well balanced and comparable with the general donor population (Table 1).32 Characteristics of the 7,573 participants in the questionnaire in measurement week 2 are provided in Table S2.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design and timing of intervention rollout (n displayed represents donations)
View this table:
Table 1. Donor characteristics in measurement week 1, where group 1 had just implemented the new policy and groups 2, 3, and 4 were considered controls

Figure 2 shows that the prevalence of iron deficiency and Hb deferral decreased after implementation of the policy. Ferritin-guided donation intervals are associated with significantly higher ferritin and Hb levels and less iron deficiency and Hb deferrals (Figure 3a). Compared to pre-implementation, the intervention was associated with up to 0.24 ng/mL higher log10 ferritin and 0.37 g/dL higher Hb at 36 months after implementation in males (Figure 3a). In premenopausal and postmenopausal females, we also observe positive, but smaller, associations with an increasing trend over time. Moreover, the odds ratio of 0.19 indicates that males are 81% less likely to be iron deficient at 36 months after implementation than before the intervention (Figure 3a). In postmenopausal females, odds ratios also decrease over the course of the trial, with iron deficiency being 87% less likely at 36 months after implementation compared to pre-implementation (Figure 3a). Hb deferral in males was up to 77% less likely as time since implementation increased, compared to pre-implementation. Similarly, in premenopausal females, Hb deferral is up to 44% less likely at 30-35 months after implementation than at pre-implementation (Figure 3a). In postmenopausal females, Hb deferral is up to 51% less likely at 36 months after implementation than at pre-implementation.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Percentage of low Hb and ferritin deferral per sex in controls and at six timepoints post-intervention
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Results of regression analyses for iron-related outcomes, donor return and iron-deficiency related symptoms. Corresponding coefficients, confidence intervals and p-values are displayed in Table S3

After adjustment for return being during a COVID-19 lockdown, odds for donor return within six months are lower at each time point after implementation compared to pre-implementation (Figure 3a). Generally, the negative association with donor return was stronger in males. At 36 months after implementation, males were 42% less likely to return for donation (Figure 3a). For premenopausal and postmenopausal females, we do not observe a consistent decrease in odds over time (Figure 3a). Tables S4-6 show that the differences in odds between groups of ferritin levels, reasons for deferral and donation center types are mostly not statistically significant.

There were no consistent significant patterns for pica, fatigue, cognitive functioning, the SF-36, and warm glow after implementation of the new policy (Figure 3b). However, males and premenopausal and postmenopausal females were 49%, 127%, and 127% more likely to report RLS at 24 months after implementation than before implementation.

Table 2 shows that during the implementation of the policy, the donation target and number of donations decreased, but the number of invitations needed to obtain one donation increased. The average donation frequency of donors decreased over the years and subsequently the number of donors that donated increased. The number of available donors increased and the proportion that donated fluctuated between 80 and 90% over the years. The number of simultaneously unavailable donors stabilized at around 40,000 donors per year. While the percentage of low ferritin deferrals increased as a result of the implemented policy, the percentage of low-Hb deferrals decreased. The number of new donors at the blood bank was higher in 2019 and 2020 than in other years, while the number of lapsed donors in 2019 was exceptionally low.

View this table:
Table 2. Blood bank statistics to describe impact of new policy on blood supply in the Netherlands. Ferritin-guided donation intervals were implemented in a step-wise manner from November 2017 onwards. Hence, there is no data on prolonged intervals due to low ferritin in 2016. In November 2019 implementation was completed and in November 2020 the study was completed. All statistics

Discussion

This stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in whole blood donors shows that ferritin and Hb levels are significantly higher and iron deficiency and Hb deferral significantly lower after the implementation of ferritin-guided donation intervals compared to the prior standard of Hb monitoring only. Conversely, we found that the odds of donor return within six months decreased substantially with this policy. Most iron deficiency-related symptoms remained unaffected, except for an increase in reports of RLS. The continuity of the blood supply was maintained, but additional efforts were required to account for the decreased donor availability.

Ferritin-guided donation intervals were associated with significantly less iron deficiency and higher ferritin and Hb levels compared to pre-implementation, consistent with findings from donor population simulations assessing ferritin testing’s impact.33 The weaker effects observed in premenopausal females could be due to their already less frequent donations before the policy, driven by longer donation intervals and more frequent low-Hb deferrals, providing more recovery time.34,35 Additionally, because of more stable iron stores due to the healthy donor effect, combined with lower donation frequency and ferritin levels in this group, may result in less pronounced improvements compared to other groups.36,37

Our finding that the new policy is associated with significantly lower odds of donor return supports previous findings on decreased return rates after deferral, but may additionally be explained by the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donation intentions, as donors measured after full implementation were slated to return during COVID-19 lockdowns.35,38–40 The weaker negative association with donor return in premenopausal compared to other groups may again be explained by their exposure to more frequent deferral through the old Hb monitoring policy.

The increased reporting of RLS seems surprising, but may simply be a result of increased awareness through information provided to donors upon implementation in their donation center. Further investigation shows no statistically significant correlation between RLS and ferritin levels. The lack of improvement we found in self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms may partially be due to the small number of questionnaire participants before implementation. However, our findings align with previous randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating iron repletion and self-reported donor health.41–43 Moreover, the benevolence and warm glow that drive donors may overshadow negative health consequences.23 More functional and objective measures of iron deficiency-related symptoms like fatigue are thus needed. Positive effects of the steady reduction in iron deficiency and Hb deferral on self-reported iron deficiency-related symptoms may be delayed and require longer follow-up in future studies.

Given the results of this trial regarding donor health and the continued fulfillment of the donation target during and after the implementation of ferritin-guided donation intervals, Sanquin decided to keep the policy in place. Our findings do, however, raise some important policy and practical considerations. First, it provides policymakers with a monitoring option that requires no effort from blood donors, may be more effective in protecting iron status than standard Hb monitoring practices, and does not impose a risk of side effects compared to iron supplementation.10 However, the decreasing donor availability due to decreasing odds of donor return and increased numbers of deferred donors stress the need for intensified donor recruitment and retention efforts.34 This is reflected in the blood bank practice, as more invitations are needed to obtain one donation. Moreover, as donation frequencies decreased after implementation of the policy, more donors were needed to reach donation demands. To increase donor availability, iron supplementation can be considered as an alternative or additional strategy.33,44

To our knowledge, this is the first randomized study that goes beyond the limitations of Hb monitoring by evaluating the effectiveness of ferritin-guided donation intervals in improving Hb and ferritin levels, donor return rates and decreasing iron deficiency, Hb deferrals, iron deficiency-related symptoms. One of the major strengths is the stepped-wedge cluster randomized approach as it allows simultaneous implementation and evaluation of a new policy. However, there are also limitations to this study. The nature of the intervention poses a risk of overestimating the positive effect of ferritin-guided donation intervals. Donors whose donation intervals are extended, may not return frequently, potentially resulting in selection bias. The risk of overestimation is to some extent minimized as the duration of the trial exceeds the length of extended donation intervals. There may even be underestimation of the effect on iron deficiency, as cut-offs for iron deficiency used in this study are lower than suggested in literature.45,46 There may also be undetected delayed effects in this trial, because ferritin levels are measured at every fifth donation, and thus individual donors may not be confronted with the policy immediately upon implementation in their donation center.

The FIND’EM study provides substantial evidence that ferritin-guided donation intervals increase Hb and ferritin levels and thereby effectively prevent iron deficiency and Hb deferral, while efforts are needed to mitigate effects on the blood supply. Future studies may investigate long-term effects on donor health outcomes. Our results may help blood services worldwide to improve their donor iron management policies in order to protect donors from developing iron deficiency.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Sanquin’s Ethical Advisory Board has reviewed and approved the FIND’EM protocol. Only data from donors who gave consent for their information and left-over material to be used for research purposes at the health check were included in the study. Donors who completed questionnaires provided informed consent for their questionnaire data to be matched with data from the donor database.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

The current project is supported by the ‘Product and Process Development Cellular Products Grant’ (PPOC18-15) granted to K. van den Hurk by the Research Programming Committee, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Authors’ contributions

KvdH designed the study. KvdH, MS, FP and FQ set up and coordinated data collection. AM, and SR wrote the analysis plan and drafted the manuscript. AM, SR and FP conducted the analyses with support from EH. The manuscript was critically reviewed and approved by all co-authors.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge all blood bank staff for their commitment to the implementation of the policy and their efforts in collecting data for our study. We are thankful to all donors for their contribution to the study and the blood supply.

Footnotes

  • a.meulenbeld{at}sanquin.nl, s.ramondt{at}vu.nl, m.sweegers{at}nki.nl, f.quee{at}sanquin.nl, f.prinsze{at}sanquin.nl, e.hoogendijk{at}amsterdamumc.nl, dorine.swinkels{at}radboudumc.nl, k.vandenhurk{at}sanquin.nl

  • Broadened the scope by adding an additional outcome and adjusted methods, results and discussion accordingly. As a result, replaced Table 2 with new outcomes. Updated figure 3 and the supplemental tables.

References

  1. 1.↵
  2. 2.↵
    Prinsze FJ, de Groot R, Timmer TC, Zalpuri S, van den Hurk K. Donation-induced iron depletion is significantly associated with low hemoglobin at subsequent donations. Transfusion. 2021;61(12):3344–3352. doi:10.1111/trf.16688
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Boulton F. Evidence-based criteria for the care and selection of blood donors, with some comments on the relationship to blood supply, and emphasis on the management of donation-induced iron depletion. Transfus Med. 2008;18(1):13–27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00818.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Newman B. Iron depletion by whole-blood donation harms menstruating females: the current whole-blood-collection paradigm needs to be changed. Transfusion. 2006;46(10):1667–1681. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00969.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Brittenham GM. Iron balance in the red blood cell donor. Dev Biol (Basel). 2005;120:77–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Vinkenoog M, van den Hurk K, van Kraaij M, van Leeuwen M, Janssen MP. First results of a ferritin-based blood donor deferral policy in the Netherlands. Transfusion. 60(8):1785–1792. doi:10.1111/trf.15906
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Boulton F. Managing donors and iron deficiency. Vox Sang. 2004;87 Suppl 2:22-24. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00448.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Schotten N, Pasker-de Jong PC, Moretti D, et al. The donation interval of 56 days requires extension to 180 days for whole blood donors to recover from changes in iron metabolism. Blood. 2016;128(17):2185–2188. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-04-709451
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Alvarez-Ossorio, Kirchner, Klüter, Schlenke. Low ferritin levels indicate the need for iron supplementation: strategy to minimize iron-depletion in regular blood donors. Transfusion Medicine. 2000;10(2):107–112. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3148.2000.00239.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Smith GA, Fisher SA, Doree C, Di Angelantonio E, Roberts DJ. Oral or parenteral iron supplementation to reduce deferral, iron deficiency and/or anaemia in blood donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD009532. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009532.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Baart AM, van den Hurk K, de Kort WL. Minimum donation intervals should be reconsidered to decrease low hemoglobin deferral in whole blood donors: an observational study. Transfusion. 2015;55(11):2641–2644. doi:10.1111/trf.13195
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Di Angelantonio E, Thompson SG, Kaptoge S, et al. Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2360–2371. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31928-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Spencer B. Blood donor iron status: are we bleeding them dry? Curr Opin Hematol. 2013;20(6):533–539. doi:10.1097/MOH.0b013e32836589f2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.
    Simon TL, Garry PJ, Hooper EM. Iron stores in blood donors. Jama. 1981;245(20):2038–2043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Cable RG, Brambilla D, Glynn SA, et al. Effect of iron supplementation on iron stores and total body iron after whole blood donation. Transfusion. 2016;56(8):2005–2012. doi:10.1111/trf.13659
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    WHO. Guidelines on Assessing Donor Suitability for Blood Donation. In: Blood Donor Selection. ; 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23700651
  17. 17.↵
    Sweegers MG, Zalpuri S, Quee FA, et al. Ferritin measurement IN Donors—Effectiveness of iron Monitoring to diminish iron deficiency and low haemoglobin in whole blood donors (FIND’EM): study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):823. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04648-w
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    European Committee (Partial Agreement) on Blood Transfusion (CD-P-TS). Guide to the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare; 2017.
  19. 19.↵
    Moazzen S, Sweegers MG, Janssen M, Hogema BM, Hoekstra T, Van Den Hurk K. Ferritin Trajectories over Repeated Whole Blood Donations: Results from the FIND+ Study. JCM. 2022;11(13):3581. doi:10.3390/jcm11133581
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Ware Jr. JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.
    Vercoulen JHMM; SCMA; FJFM; GJMD; van der MJWM; BG. de Checklist Individual Strength (CIS). Gedragstherapie. 1999;32:131–136.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    Van den Hurk K, Peffer K, Habets K, et al. Blood donors’ physical characteristics are associated with pre- and post-donation symptoms - Donor InSight. Blood Transfus. 2017;15(5):405–412. doi:10.2450/2016.0023-16
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Ferguson E, Atsma F, de Kort W, Veldhuizen I. Exploring the pattern of blood donor beliefs in first-time, novice, and experienced donors: differentiating reluctant altruism, pure altruism, impure altruism, and warm glow. Transfusion. 2012;52(2):343–355. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03279.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Published online 2020.
  25. 25.
    Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Soft. 2015;67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Third edition. SAGE; 2019.
  27. 27.
    Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Diagnostic Checking in Regression Relationships. R News. 2002;2(3):7–10.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.
    Zeileis A. Object-Oriented Computation of Sandwich Estimators. Journal of Statistical Software . 2006;16(9):1–16. doi:10.18637/jss.v016.i09
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.
    Hebbali A. Olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=olsrr
  30. 30.↵
    Todorov V, Filzmoser P. An Object-Oriented Framework for Robust Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2009;32(3):1–47.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Allaire JJ, Teague C, Scheidegger C, Xie Y, Dervieux C. Quarto. Published online January 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5960048
  32. 32.↵
    Timmer TC, de Groot R, Habets K, et al. Donor InSight: characteristics and representativeness of a Dutch cohort study on blood and plasma donors. Vox Sang . 2019;114(2):117–128. doi:10.1111/vox.12731
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    Richard P, Fillet A, Malard L, et al. Impact of donor ferritin testing on iron deficiency prevention and blood availability in France: A cohort simulation study. Vox Sanguinis. 2023;118(1):24–32. doi:10.1111/vox.13377
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    Spekman MLC, Ramondt S, Sweegers MG. Whole blood donor behavior and availability after deferral: Consequences of a new ferritin monitoring policy. Transfusion. 2021;61(4):1112–1121. doi:10.1111/trf.16235
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    Spekman MLC, Tilburg TG, Merz E. Do deferred donors continue their donations? A large-scale register study on whole blood donor return in the Netherlands. Transfusion. 2019;59(12):3657–3665. doi:10.1111/trf.15551
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    Moazzen S, sweegers M, Hogema B, Hoekstra T, van den Hurk K. Ferritin trajectories over repeated whole blood donations: results from the FIND+ study. medRxiv. Published online 2021:2021.12.13.21267744. doi:10.1101/2021.12.13.21267744
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Atsma F, Veldhuizen I, Verbeek A, de Kort W, de Vegt F. Healthy donor effect: its magnitude in health research among blood donors. Transfusion. 2011;51(8):1820–1828. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03055.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Custer B, Chinn A, Hirschler NV, Busch MP, Murphy EL. The consequences of temporary deferral on future whole blood donation. Transfusion. 2007;47(8):1514–1523. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01292.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.
    Custer B, Schlumpf KS, Wright D, et al. Donor return after temporary deferral. Transfusion. 2011;51(6):1188–1196. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02989.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Veseli B, Sandner S, Studte S, Clement M. The impact of COVID-19 on blood donations. Dickert S, ed. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265171. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265171
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    Hod EA, Brittenham GM, Bitan ZC, et al. A randomized trial of blood donor iron repletion on red cell quality for transfusion and donor cognition and well-being. Blood. 2022;140(25):2730–2739. doi:10.1182/blood.2022017288
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.
    Waldvogel S, Pedrazzini B, Vaucher P, et al. Clinical evaluation of iron treatment efficiency among non-anemic but iron-deficient female blood donors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2012;10:8. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Keller P, von Känel R, Hincapié CA, et al. The effects of intravenous iron supplementation on fatigue and general health in non-anemic blood donors with iron deficiency: a randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14219. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71048-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Karregat J, Sweegers MG, Quee FA, et al. Ferritin-guided iron supplementation in whole blood donors: optimal dosage, donor response, return and efficacy (FORTE)-a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e056316–e056316. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056316
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Galetti V, Stoffel NU, Sieber C, Zeder C, Moretti D, Zimmermann MB. Threshold ferritin and hepcidin concentrations indicating early iron deficiency in young women based on upregulation of iron absorption. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;39:101052. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101052
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    Tarancon-Diez L, Genebat M, Roman-Enry M, et al. Threshold Ferritin Concentrations Reflecting Early Iron Deficiency Based on Hepcidin and Soluble Transferrin Receptor Serum Levels in Patients with Absolute Iron Deficiency. Nutrients. 2022;14(22):4739. doi:10.3390/nu14224739
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted September 19, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Effectiveness of Ferritin-guided Donation Intervals in Blood Donors: Results of the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized FIND’EM Trial
Amber Meulenbeld, Steven Ramondt, Maike G. Sweegers, Franke A. Quee, Femmeke J. Prinsze, Emiel O. Hoogendijk, Dorine W. Swinkels, Katja van den Hurk
medRxiv 2023.01.24.23284933; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284933
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area