Abstract
Background The incidence of intertrochanteric femur fracture (IFF) in the elderly has increased with increased life expectancy globally. These fractures require surgeries at the earliest to bring them out of bed and minimize the complications of recumbency, like decubitus ulcers, decreased cardiopulmonary reserves, and thromboembolic events. Dynamic hip screws and Cephalomedullary nails (CMN) are both considered adequate for the internal fixation of the stable IFF with comparable stability and outcomes. However, CMNs are considered to have better results in unstable IFF fixation.
Objective To compare the outcomes of internal fixation of short CMN versus long CMN of IFF in the elderly by analyzing the evidence from the current literature.
Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A primary search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases will be conducted using a pre-defined search strategy. The studies of any design in the English language will be included, which have compared the outcomes of the internal fixation of short CMN versus long CMN of the IFF and reported at least one primary or secondary outcome of interest.
Studies that did not compare the outcomes of the internal fixation of short CMN versus long CMN of the IFF, conference abstracts, posters, case reports, book chapters, technical tips, review articles, biomechanical studies, cadaveric studies, and the articles not in the English language will be excluded.
Both qualitative and quantitative analyses will be performed. A qualitative analysis will be performed using appropriate tables and diagrams. Wherever feasible, quantitative analysis will be done with the appropriate software. The risk-of-bias assessment for non-randomized comparative studies will be done using the MINORS tool, and the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk-of-bias tool will be used for randomized control trials (RCT).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis in which we will use the data form the already published articles.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Amendments: None
Conflicts of Interest: None
Sources of Support/Funding: None
Data Availability
Yes
