Abstract
Background Mendelian randomisation (MR) is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables. Mode-based estimators (MBE) are one of the most popular types of estimators used in univariable-MR studies. However, because there are no plurality valid regression estimators, there are no existent modal estimators for multivariable-MR.
Methods We use the residual method for multivariable-MR to introduce two multivariable modal estimators: multivariable-MBE, which uses IVW to create residuals fed into a traditional plurality valid estimator, and multivariable-CM which instead has the residuals fed into the contamination mixture method. We then use Monte-Carlo simulations to explore the performance of these estimators when compared to existing ones and re-analyse the data used by Grant and Burgess (2021) looking at the causal effect of intelligence, education, and household income on Alzheimer’s disease as an applied example.
Results In our simulation, we found that multivariable-MBE was generally too variable to be much use. Multivariable-CM produced more precise estimates on the other hand. Multivariable-CM performed better than MR-Egger in almost all settings, and Weighted Median under balanced pleiotropy. However, it underperformed Weighted Median when there was a moderate amount of directional pleiotropy. Our re-analysis supported the conclusion of Grant and Burgess (2021), that intelligence had a protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease, while education, and household income do not have a causal effect.
Conclusions Here we introduced two, non-regression-based, plurality valid estimators for multivariable MR. Of these, “multivariable-CM” which uses IVW to create residuals fed into a contamination-mixture model, performed the best. This method uses a plurality of variants valid assumption, and appears to provided precise and unbiased estimates in the presence of balanced pleiotropy and small amounts of directional pleiotropy. We developed the MVMRmode R package (available from https://github.com/bar-woolf/MVMRmode/wiki) to facilitate the use of this estimator. We hope this will further enable the future triangulation of univariable MR studies which have used plurality valid estimators with multivariable MR designs.
Competing Interest Statement
DG is employed part-time by Novo Nordisk. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Benjamin Woolf is funded by an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) South West Doctoral Training Partnership (SWDTP) 1+3 PhD Studentship Award (ES/P000630/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The R code used in this study is available from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8DZKU. We have also created an R package available from github (https://github.com/bar-woolf/MVMRmode/wiki) to facilitate the implementation of our proposed method. All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
