Abstract
Background The number of clinical studies evaluating the benefit of cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy, an adoptive immunotherapy, for colorectal cancer (CRC) are increasing. In many of these trials CIK therapy was co-administered with conventional cancer therapy. The aim of this review is to systematically assess the available literature, in which the majority were only in Chinese, on CIK therapy for the management of CRC using meta-analysis, and to identify parameters associated with successful CIK therapy implementation.
Methods Prospective and retrospective clinical studies which compared CIK therapy to non-CIK therapy in CRC patients were searched for electronically on MEDLINE, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang Data databases. The clinical endpoints of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), OS and PFS rates, overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity were meta-analysed using hazard (HR) and relative ratios (RR), and subgroup analyses were performed using Chi-square (Chi2) test and I-square (I2) statistics for study design, disease stage, co-therapy type, and timing of administration.
Results In total, 70 studies involving 6,743 patients were analysed. CIK therapy was favoured over non-CIK therapy for OS (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.65), PFS (HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.47-0.63), and ORR (RR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.57-0.74) without increasing toxicity (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.16-2.25). Subgroup analyses on OS and PFS by study design (randomised versus non-randomised study design), disease stage (Stage I-III versus Stage IV), co-treatment with dendritic cells (CIK versus DC-CIK therapy), or timing of therapy administration (concurrent versus sequential with co-administered anti-cancer therapy) also showed that the clinical benefit of CIK therapy was robust in any subgroup analysis. Furthermore, co-treatment with dendritic cells did not improve clinical outcomes over CIK therapy alone.
Conclusions Compared with standard therapy, patients who received additional CIK cell therapy had favourable outcomes without increased toxicity, warranting further investigation into CIK therapy for the treatment of CRC.
What is already known on this topic Cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) therapy is an adoptive immunotherapy used to treat both solid and haematological cancers for over 20 years. It is predominantly used in China, with multiple studies reporting benefit in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Despite this, CIK therapy treatment regimens are not widely used, possibly due in part to the majority of the literature about CIK therapy in CRC being reported in Chinese. Further, CIK therapy is commonly combined with other therapies but it is currently not known if there is a specific combination or treatment regimen that is optimal for CRC.
What this study adds We report the most comprehensive systematic review to date of CIK therapy for CRC patients, combining both Chinese and English language reports. Patients with CRC who received additional CIK therapy had better survival outcomes than with standard therapy alone. We also showed that the addition of dendritic cells (DC) to CIK therapy, common for CRC treatment, did not provide any clinical benefit over CIK therapy alone, and that CIK therapy is effective whether given concurrently or sequentially to standard treatment regimens.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy Our systematic review of Chinese and English publications shows that CRC patients benefit from the addition of CIK therapy to standard treatment protocols and warrants further international studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a The Hospital Research Foundation (THRF)/Cancer Council SA Beat Cancer Hospital Research Package (GM) and a Tour de Cure Early Career Grant (KF). BD was supported by a Schlumberger Foundation Faculty For Future Fellowship and and KF was supported by a THRF Early Career Fellowship.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The data are derived from publicly available journal articles.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos